TransAlta Corporation

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CGNWF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CGNWF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CGNWF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CGNWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CGNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CGNWF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNPRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while UNPRF trades at $39.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas UNPRF's P/E ratio is -165.71. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to UNPRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to UNPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check UNPRF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HGKGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while HGKGF trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas HGKGF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HGKGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to HGKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check HGKGF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HGKGY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while HGKGY trades at $6.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas HGKGY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HGKGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and HGKGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGKGY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HUNGF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while HUNGF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas HUNGF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HUNGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and HUNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUNGF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRPJY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CRPJY trades at $37.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CRPJY's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CRPJY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CRPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CRPJY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRPJF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CRPJF trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CRPJF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CRPJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CRPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CRPJF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CPYYY has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CPYYY trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CPYYY's P/E ratio is -34.92. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CPYYY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CPYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CPYYY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CPYYF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CPYYF trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CPYYF's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CPYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CPYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CPYYF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DIPGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while DIPGF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas DIPGF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DIPGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to DIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check DIPGF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CPWPF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CPWPF trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CPWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CPWPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CPWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CPWPF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CPRHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CPRHF trades at $19.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CPRHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CPRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and CPRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPRHF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EDRVY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while EDRVY trades at $24.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas EDRVY's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EDRVY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to EDRVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check EDRVY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CPXWF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CPXWF trades at $40.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CPXWF's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CPXWF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CPXWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CPXWF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TLNE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while TLNE trades at $125.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas TLNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TLNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and TLNE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLNE's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KYSEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while KYSEF trades at $9.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas KYSEF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KYSEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to KYSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check KYSEF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGLXY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while AGLXY trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas AGLXY's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and AGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGLXY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CTPTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CTPTY trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CTPTY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CTPTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and CTPTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTPTY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGLNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while AGLNF trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas AGLNF's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AGLNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and AGLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGLNF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CTPZY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CTPZY trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CTPZY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CTPZY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to CTPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check CTPZY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KYSEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while KYSEY trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas KYSEY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KYSEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and KYSEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KYSEY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TSLTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while TSLTF trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas TSLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TSLTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to TSLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check TSLTF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EYUBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while EYUBY trades at $22.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas EYUBY's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EYUBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to EYUBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check EYUBY's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ACPIF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while ACPIF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas ACPIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACPIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to ACPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check ACPIF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EYGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while EYGPF trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas EYGPF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EYGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and EYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EYGPF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CGEGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while CGEGF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas CGEGF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CGEGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and CGEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGEGF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RJIFF has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while RJIFF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas RJIFF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RJIFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to RJIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check RJIFF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SRGRF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while SRGRF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas SRGRF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SRGRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and SRGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRGRF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MXGFF has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while MXGFF trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas MXGFF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MXGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to MXGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check MXGFF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EWCLF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while EWCLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas EWCLF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EWCLF's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and EWCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EWCLF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GDYMF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while GDYMF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas GDYMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GDYMF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to GDYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check GDYMF's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GEFI has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while GEFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas GEFI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GEFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and GEFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEFI's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SOPV has a market cap of 608. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while SOPV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas SOPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SOPV's ROE of +57.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to SOPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check SOPV's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BLSP has a market cap of 105. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while BLSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas BLSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BLSP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF is less volatile compared to BLSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNSSF.Check BLSP's competition here

TNSSF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TNSSF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPIWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNSSF is priced at $9.51, while NPIWF trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TNSSF currently has a P/E ratio of -9.26, whereas NPIWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNSSF's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NPIWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNSSF and NPIWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPIWF's competition here