CGN Power Co., Ltd. (CGNWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGNWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGNWF | $0.36 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 11.83 | $0.03 | +3.54% |
| UNPRF | $55.20 | +0.00% | 23B | 12.03 | $4.59 | +1.51% |
| HUNGF | $0.90 | -5.40% | 18.3B | 8.18 | $0.11 | +4.19% |
| HGKGF | $8.57 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 23.16 | $0.37 | +4.21% |
| CRPJY | $44.61 | +26.05% | 15.4B | 8.32 | $5.36 | +5.27% |
| HGKGY | $7.14 | -0.83% | 15.1B | 19.14 | $0.37 | +5.13% |
| CRPJF | $2.33 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 6.13 | $0.38 | +5.74% |
| CPYYY | $10.23 | -1.06% | 11.6B | -128.26 | -$0.08 | +2.86% |
| CPYYF | $2.37 | -5.95% | 10.7B | -118.37 | -$0.02 | +3.13% |
| DIPGF | $0.27 | +0.00% | 8.8B | 6.75 | $0.04 | +6.11% |
Stock Comparison
CGNWF vs UNPRF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, UNPRF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while UNPRF trades at $55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas UNPRF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNPRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to UNPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check UNPRF's competition here
CGNWF vs HUNGF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, HUNGF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while HUNGF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas HUNGF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUNGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to HUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check HUNGF's competition here
CGNWF vs HGKGF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, HGKGF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while HGKGF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas HGKGF's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGKGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to HGKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check HGKGF's competition here
CGNWF vs CRPJY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CRPJY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CRPJY trades at $44.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CRPJY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CRPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CRPJY's competition here
CGNWF vs HGKGY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, HGKGY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while HGKGY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas HGKGY's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGKGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to HGKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check HGKGY's competition here
CGNWF vs CRPJF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CRPJF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CRPJF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CRPJF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRPJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CRPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CRPJF's competition here
CGNWF vs CPYYY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CPYYY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPYYY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPYYY's P/E ratio is -128.26. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPYYY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPYYY's competition here
CGNWF vs CPYYF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CPYYF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPYYF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPYYF's P/E ratio is -118.37. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPYYF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPYYF's competition here
CGNWF vs DIPGF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, DIPGF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while DIPGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas DIPGF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIPGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to DIPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check DIPGF's competition here
CGNWF vs CPXWF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CPXWF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPXWF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPXWF's P/E ratio is -637.50. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPXWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPXWF's competition here
CGNWF vs TLNE Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, TLNE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while TLNE trades at $125.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas TLNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to TLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check TLNE's competition here
CGNWF vs KYSEY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, KYSEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while KYSEY trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas KYSEY's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KYSEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to KYSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check KYSEY's competition here
CGNWF vs KYSEF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, KYSEF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while KYSEF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas KYSEF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KYSEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to KYSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check KYSEF's competition here
CGNWF vs AGLNF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, AGLNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while AGLNF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas AGLNF's P/E ratio is -59.55. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGLNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to AGLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check AGLNF's competition here
CGNWF vs TSLTF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, TSLTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while TSLTF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas TSLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSLTF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to TSLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check TSLTF's competition here
CGNWF vs CTPTY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CTPTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CTPTY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CTPTY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTPTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CTPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CTPTY's competition here
CGNWF vs AGLXY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, AGLXY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while AGLXY trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas AGLXY's P/E ratio is -56.27. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGLXY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to AGLXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check AGLXY's competition here
CGNWF vs CTPZY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CTPZY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CTPZY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CTPZY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTPZY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CTPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CTPZY's competition here
CGNWF vs TNSSF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, TNSSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while TNSSF trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas TNSSF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNSSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to TNSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check TNSSF's competition here
CGNWF vs CPRHF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CPRHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPRHF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPRHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPRHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPRHF's competition here
CGNWF vs EYUBY Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, EYUBY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EYUBY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EYUBY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EYUBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to EYUBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EYUBY's competition here
CGNWF vs CPWPF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CPWPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPWPF trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPWPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPWPF's competition here
CGNWF vs EYGPF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, EYGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EYGPF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EYGPF's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EYGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to EYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EYGPF's competition here
CGNWF vs CGEGF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CGEGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CGEGF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CGEGF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGEGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CGEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CGEGF's competition here
CGNWF vs ACPIF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, ACPIF has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while ACPIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas ACPIF's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACPIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to ACPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check ACPIF's competition here
CGNWF vs RJIFF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, RJIFF has a market cap of 302.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while RJIFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas RJIFF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RJIFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to RJIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check RJIFF's competition here
CGNWF vs SRGRF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, SRGRF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while SRGRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas SRGRF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRGRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to SRGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check SRGRF's competition here
CGNWF vs MXGFF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, MXGFF has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while MXGFF trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas MXGFF's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MXGFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to MXGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check MXGFF's competition here
CGNWF vs EWCLF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, EWCLF has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EWCLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EWCLF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EWCLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to EWCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EWCLF's competition here
CGNWF vs GDYMF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, GDYMF has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while GDYMF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas GDYMF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to GDYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check GDYMF's competition here
CGNWF vs BLSP Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, BLSP has a market cap of 31.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while BLSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas BLSP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLSP's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to BLSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check BLSP's competition here
CGNWF vs SOPV Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, SOPV has a market cap of 608. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while SOPV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas SOPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOPV's ROE of +57.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to SOPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check SOPV's competition here
CGNWF vs GEFI Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, GEFI has a market cap of 39. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while GEFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas GEFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to GEFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check GEFI's competition here
CGNWF vs NRGSP Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NRGSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while NRGSP trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas NRGSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRGSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to NRGSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check NRGSP's competition here
CGNWF vs NPIWF Comparison June 2026
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NPIWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while NPIWF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas NPIWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPIWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to NPIWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check NPIWF's competition here