Tennant Minerals Limited
Tennant Minerals Limited TMS.AX Peers
See (TMS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMS.AX | $0.01 | N/A | 5.32M | -0.70 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | $38.63 | -0.05% | 196.04B | 11.13 | $3.47 | +4.92% |
| RIO.AX | $118.88 | -0.57% | 163.48B | 10.77 | $11.04 | +5.18% |
| FMG.AX | $15.89 | -1.49% | 48.85B | 8.11 | $1.96 | +13.64% |
| S32.AX | $3.09 | +0.32% | 13.88B | -38.62 | -$0.08 | +2.07% |
| LYC.AX | $8.13 | +6.97% | 7.61B | 162.60 | $0.05 | N/A |
| AKE.AX | $9.83 | -5.57% | 6.30B | 9.54 | $1.03 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | $1.00 | N/A | 5.83B | 14.21 | $0.07 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | $23.70 | +0.81% | 4.63B | -3.81 | -$6.22 | N/A |
| PLS.AX | $1.36 | -0.73% | 4.36B | -135.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMS.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 196.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while BHP.AX trades at $38.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 163.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while RIO.AX trades at $118.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 48.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while FMG.AX trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs S32.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 13.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while S32.AX trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is -38.62. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 7.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LYC.AX trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 162.60. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AKE.AX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ATM.AX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 4.63B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MIN.AX trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PLS.AX trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -135.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while IGO.AX trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NIC.AX trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AVZ.AX trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while DRR.AX trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ADT.AX trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AZS.AX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ILU.AX trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LTR.AX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while BOE.AX trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -50.71. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PRN.AX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while IPX.AX trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while A4N.AX trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while DVP.AX trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is -126.33. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 902.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while VUL.AX trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 851.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while BCI.AX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AII.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 786.29M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AII.AX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MCR.AX trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while KLL.AX trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of +74.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LLL.AX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 591.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MAH.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 574.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while FFM.AX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs G6M.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 548.01M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while G6M.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 524.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AMI.AX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LRS.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 469.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MLX.AX trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 442.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MAU.AX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 435.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CHN.AX trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 429.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MAUCA.AX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 423.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SVM.AX trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 406.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ARU.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 402.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LOT.AX trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 384.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SYR.AX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while RXM.AX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LPI.AX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 362.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while JMS.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 361.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PMT.AX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 355.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CAY.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 342.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while KP2.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 323.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MMI.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298.03M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while BSE.AX trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs INR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 294.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while INR.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 253.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while RHK.AX trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SO4.AX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 252.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while OMH.AX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 245.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MEI.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 229.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while FEX.AX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 225.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NTU.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of +54.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 219.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while GRR.AX trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 217.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while TVN.AX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 215.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while RHI.AX trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 204.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PLL.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 191.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CTM.AX trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 186.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CXO.AX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AUT.AX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 178.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while TLG.AX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 173.15M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while SYA.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 172.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while RNU.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 167.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while QGL.AX trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -24.25. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while VIA.AX trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 166.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NWC.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 165.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while EGR.AX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 154.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AIS.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs CII.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while CII.AX trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs TZN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, TZN.AX has a market cap of 148.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while TZN.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TZN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TZN.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to TZN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NCZ.AX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 141.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ZEO.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs STA.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while STA.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 138.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while LIN.AX trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs NMR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, NMR.AX has a market cap of 136.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NMR.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NMR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NMR.AX's ROE of +20.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to NMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ESS.AX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 126.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ARR.AX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 125.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MRL.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 119.65M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PEK.AX trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 119.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while WA8.AX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 117.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ENR.AX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 113.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while FHE.AX trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 110.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AUE.AX trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ZER.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ZER.AX has a market cap of 108.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ZER.AX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ZER.AX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZER.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ZER.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 108.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while NVA.AX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 106.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ATR.AX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs A11.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 106.28M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while A11.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PAN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PAN.AX has a market cap of 103.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PAN.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PAN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PAN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 100.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while AGE.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs DRX.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, DRX.AX has a market cap of 100.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while DRX.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DRX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DRX.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to DRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 94.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while GLN.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 94.30M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while ASM.AX trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 92.04M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while EQR.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 91.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while PSC.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs MLG.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, MLG.AX has a market cap of 91.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while MLG.AX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MLG.AX's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLG.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to MLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.
TMS.AX vs QPM.AX Comparison
TMS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMS.AX stands at 5.32M. In comparison, QPM.AX has a market cap of 90.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TMS.AX is priced at $0.01, while QPM.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas QPM.AX's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, TMS.AX's ROE is -0.00%, compared to QPM.AX's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMS.AX is more volatile compared to QPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMS.AX.