Toho Co., Ltd.
Toho Co., Ltd. TKCOF Peers
See (TKCOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKCOF | $43.45 | N/A | 7.2B | 21.62 | $2.01 | +0.56% |
| UNVGY | $15.50 | -0.39% | 58B | 24.22 | $0.64 | +2.26% |
| UMGNF | $31.27 | +1.51% | 57.3B | 24.62 | $1.27 | +2.11% |
| FWONB | $90.00 | +3.23% | 31.2B | 1500.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.07 | -1.30% | 16.9B | 101.17 | $0.06 | +1.41% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | N/A | 16.6B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMY | $31.86 | +10.80% | 12.2B | 36.20 | $0.88 | +1.03% |
| CEVMF | $125.65 | N/A | 12.1B | 35.59 | $3.53 | +1.50% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TOEAF | $21.19 | N/A | 4.3B | 26.49 | $0.80 | +0.01% |
Stock Comparison
TKCOF vs UNVGY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while UNVGY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs UMGNF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while UMGNF trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs FWONB Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while FWONB trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 1500.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BOIVF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BOIVF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 101.17. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NWSAL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CEVMY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CEVMY trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CEVMF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CEVMF trades at $125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VIVEF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TOEAF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TOEAF trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VIVHY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VIVHY trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MCHOY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MCHOY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MCOIF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MHSDF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MHSDF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CYFWY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NANHF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ATVDY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ATVDY trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NNMTF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AIOSF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AIOSF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NENTY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CYFWF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs JVTSF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while JVTSF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -375.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TCLRY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CIEZF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CPXGF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CPXGF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BORUF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 476.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BORUF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BORUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs IMXCF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while IMXCF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs WLDBF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while WLDBF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CLQDF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AFCJF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CLTFF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 180.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CLTFF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NENTF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs APTTF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while APTTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs STEAF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GOAI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GOAI trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -35.71. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ANGMF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs THBRF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while THBRF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GMSQF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ZUMRF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs DTTVY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs LGMH Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ICABY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ICABY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs OAMCF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while OAMCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs APHP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while APHP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APHP's ROE of +6.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs QYOUF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ASGRF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BBOP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CNWGQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs XOEEF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MVNC Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HWAL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HWAL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CNNWQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMFL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMFL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs STGZ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while STGZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ICABF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BLIBQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HHSE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HHSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GULDF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GULDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs LTES Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CAPV Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ENTEF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ENTEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ITVI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NETWF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NETWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BSEG Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs EEGI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BLIAQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SEGI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HDUP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HDUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs STCXF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AFOM Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TRMNF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 868.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TRMNF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HQGE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs RLTR Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 770.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMNNF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VNUE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 590.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs UMGP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 560.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while UMGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CCLX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs WRIT Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 481.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TAMG Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BOTY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs WEBB Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs IMTV Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VGTL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 308.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CEXE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs RIVU Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MIKP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MLFB Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SNMN Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs RWMI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 109.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SAPX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 73.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs URBT Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SVSN Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GBHL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMRU Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HOMU Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SAKL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs XSPT Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs PLFX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 28.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GTOR Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to GTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMXX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.