Toho Co., Ltd.
Toho Co., Ltd. TKCOF Peers
See (TKCOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKCOF | $43.45 | N/A | 7.22B | 21.62 | $2.01 | +0.56% |
| UNVGY | $14.88 | -1.72% | 54.56B | 23.25 | $0.64 | +1.82% |
| UMGNF | $29.28 | -3.68% | 53.68B | 22.88 | $1.28 | +2.12% |
| FWONB | $80.50 | N/A | 27.43B | -619.23 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| BOIVF | $6.15 | -3.23% | 17.32B | 102.50 | $0.06 | +1.36% |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | N/A | 16.92B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| CEVMY | $31.60 | N/A | 12.13B | 33.62 | $0.94 | +0.74% |
| CEVMF | $110.90 | N/A | 10.65B | 29.49 | $3.76 | +1.29% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.57B | 22.80 | $0.46 | N/A |
| TOEAF | $24.17 | +11.84% | 4.94B | 33.57 | $0.72 | +0.01% |
Stock Comparison
TKCOF vs UNVGY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 54.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while UNVGY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs UMGNF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 53.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while UMGNF trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs FWONB Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 27.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while FWONB trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is -619.23. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FWONB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BOIVF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BOIVF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 102.50. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NWSAL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CEVMY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CEVMY trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CEVMF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CEVMF trades at $110.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VIVEF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TOEAF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TOEAF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VIVHY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VIVHY trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MCHOY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MCHOY trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MCOIF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MHSDF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MHSDF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CYFWY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NANHF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CYFWF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NNMTF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NENTY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ATVDY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ATVDY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs JVTSF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while JVTSF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AIOSF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AIOSF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TCLRY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CIEZF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CPXGF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 459.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CPXGF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BORUF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 441.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BORUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BORUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs IMXCF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 305.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while IMXCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs WLDBF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 295.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while WLDBF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CLQDF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AFCJF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CLTFF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 188.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CLTFF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NENTF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 162.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs APTTF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 112.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while APTTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs DTTVY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 103.96M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GOAI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 101.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GOAI trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs STEAF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ANGMF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs THBRF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 39.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while THBRF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GMSQF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ZUMRF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs LGMH Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs APHP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 28.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while APHP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APHP's ROE of +55.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs OAMCF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 18.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while OAMCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ICABY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 17.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ICABY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs QYOUF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HWAL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 14.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HWAL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ASGRF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BBOP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBOP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CNWGQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs XOEEF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CNNWQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMFL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 5.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMFL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ICABF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MVNC Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 4.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MVNC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BLIBQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HHSE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 4.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HHSE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ENTEF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 3.13M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ENTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs LTES Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTES's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CAPV Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs STGZ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while STGZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs ITVI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HQGE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs EEGI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HDUP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BSEG Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BSEG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BLIAQ Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SEGI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs NETWF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while NETWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs STCXF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs UMGP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 891763.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while UMGP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMNNF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736064.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GULDF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 666577.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GULDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs RLTR Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 631516.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VNUE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 590852.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CCLX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499820.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TAMG Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463682.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BOTY Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460484.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs WRIT Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 451719.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs WEBB Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389826.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs IMTV Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313681.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs VGTL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 308743.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs BRSE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 280352.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while BRSE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs CEXE Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260304.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEXE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs TRMNF Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 258474.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while TRMNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs RIVU Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244876.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MIKP Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222700.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs MLFB Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148773.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GBHL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 114107.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SNMN Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112921.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs RWMI Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 109089.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SAPX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 81392.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs URBT Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63000.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to URBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SVSN Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58008.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs PLFX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 56812.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMRU Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47158.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs HOMU Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37523.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs XSPT Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33260.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs GTOR Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24129.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is more volatile compared to GTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs SAKL Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 23278.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while SAKL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.
TKCOF vs AMXX Comparison
TKCOF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TKCOF stands at 7.22B. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22718.00. Regarding current trading prices, TKCOF is priced at $43.45, while AMXX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TKCOF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.62, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TKCOF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TKCOF is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TKCOF.