Telecom Italia S.p.A.
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (TIT.BR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TIT.BR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIT.BR | €0.31 | +0.49% | 6.3B | -0.58 | -€0.53 | N/A |
| VERIZ.BR | €54.00 | +0.00% | 227B | 12.19 | €4.43 | N/A |
| DTEL.BR | €20.00 | +0.37% | 99.5B | 18.02 | €1.11 | N/A |
| ORA.PA | €17.89 | +1.22% | 47.6B | 89.45 | €0.20 | +4.19% |
| TFA.BR | €3.90 | +0.59% | 22.4B | 15.00 | €0.26 | N/A |
| KPN.AS | €4.85 | +1.66% | 18.5B | 23.09 | €0.21 | +3.61% |
| IAM.PA | €9.20 | -1.08% | 8.1B | 12.96 | €0.71 | +2.95% |
| NOS.LS | €5.56 | +1.09% | 2.8B | 11.12 | €0.50 | +7.19% |
| TNET.BR | €21.28 | +0.38% | 2.3B | 11.89 | €1.79 | +4.70% |
| PROX.BR | €6.99 | -1.41% | 2.3B | 5.68 | €1.23 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
TIT.BR vs VERIZ.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VERIZ.BR has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while VERIZ.BR trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas VERIZ.BR's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VERIZ.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to VERIZ.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check VERIZ.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs DTEL.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DTEL.BR has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while DTEL.BR trades at €20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas DTEL.BR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DTEL.BR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to DTEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check DTEL.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs ORA.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ORA.PA has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while ORA.PA trades at €17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas ORA.PA's P/E ratio is 89.45. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORA.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to ORA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check ORA.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs TFA.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TFA.BR has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while TFA.BR trades at €3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas TFA.BR's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TFA.BR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to TFA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check TFA.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs KPN.AS Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KPN.AS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while KPN.AS trades at €4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas KPN.AS's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPN.AS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to KPN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check KPN.AS's competition here
TIT.BR vs IAM.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IAM.PA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while IAM.PA trades at €9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas IAM.PA's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IAM.PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to IAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check IAM.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs NOS.LS Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NOS.LS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while NOS.LS trades at €5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas NOS.LS's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOS.LS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to NOS.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check NOS.LS's competition here
TIT.BR vs TNET.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TNET.BR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while TNET.BR trades at €21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas TNET.BR's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNET.BR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to TNET.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check TNET.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs PROX.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PROX.BR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while PROX.BR trades at €6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas PROX.BR's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PROX.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to PROX.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check PROX.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs VEON.AS Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VEON.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while VEON.AS trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas VEON.AS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEON.AS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to VEON.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check VEON.AS's competition here
TIT.BR vs OBEL.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OBEL.BR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while OBEL.BR trades at €20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas OBEL.BR's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OBEL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to OBEL.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check OBEL.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs TISN.BR Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TISN.BR has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while TISN.BR trades at €0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas TISN.BR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TISN.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to TISN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check TISN.BR's competition here
TIT.BR vs PHR.LS Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PHR.LS has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while PHR.LS trades at €0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas PHR.LS's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHR.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to PHR.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check PHR.LS's competition here
TIT.BR vs ALOSM.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALOSM.PA has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while ALOSM.PA trades at €15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas ALOSM.PA's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALOSM.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to ALOSM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check ALOSM.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs PAR.MC Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PAR.MC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while PAR.MC trades at €1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas PAR.MC's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAR.MC's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is less volatile compared to PAR.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check PAR.MC's competition here
TIT.BR vs ALBUD.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALBUD.PA has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while ALBUD.PA trades at €3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas ALBUD.PA's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALBUD.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to ALBUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check ALBUD.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs LLN.MC Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LLN.MC has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while LLN.MC trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas LLN.MC's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLN.MC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to LLN.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check LLN.MC's competition here
TIT.BR vs ALLLN.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALLLN.PA has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while ALLLN.PA trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas ALLLN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALLLN.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to ALLLN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check ALLLN.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs ALBDM.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALBDM.PA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while ALBDM.PA trades at €5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas ALBDM.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALBDM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is less volatile compared to ALBDM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check ALBDM.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs MLWEA.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MLWEA.PA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while MLWEA.PA trades at €2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas MLWEA.PA's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLWEA.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to MLWEA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check MLWEA.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs MLNEO.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MLNEO.PA has a market cap of 194.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while MLNEO.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas MLNEO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLNEO.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is less volatile compared to MLNEO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check MLNEO.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs BUDBS.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BUDBS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while BUDBS.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas BUDBS.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BUDBS.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is less volatile compared to BUDBS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check BUDBS.PA's competition here
TIT.BR vs ILD.PA Comparison April 2026
TIT.BR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIT.BR stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ILD.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TIT.BR is priced at €0.31, while ILD.PA trades at €182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIT.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.58, whereas ILD.PA's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, TIT.BR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ILD.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIT.BR is more volatile compared to ILD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIT.BR.Check ILD.PA's competition here