LleidaNetworks Serveis Telemàtics, S.A.
LleidaNetworks Serveis Telemàtics, S.A. (LLN.MC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LLN.MC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLN.MC | €1.15 | +0.44% | 18.2M | 12.72 | €0.09 | N/A |
| VERIZ.BR | €54.00 | +0.00% | 227B | 12.19 | €4.43 | N/A |
| DTEL.BR | €20.00 | +0.37% | 99.5B | 18.02 | €1.11 | N/A |
| ORA.PA | €17.67 | -2.48% | 47B | 147.25 | €0.12 | +4.24% |
| TFA.BR | €3.90 | +0.59% | 22.4B | 15.00 | €0.26 | N/A |
| KPN.AS | €4.57 | -0.80% | 17.5B | 21.76 | €0.21 | +3.98% |
| IAM.PA | €9.34 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 13.15 | €0.71 | +2.91% |
| TIT.BR | €0.31 | +0.49% | 6.3B | -0.58 | -€0.53 | N/A |
| NOS.LS | €5.21 | +0.10% | 2.7B | 10.84 | €0.48 | +8.65% |
| TNET.BR | €21.28 | +0.38% | 2.3B | 11.89 | €1.79 | +4.70% |
Stock Comparison
LLN.MC vs VERIZ.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VERIZ.BR has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while VERIZ.BR trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VERIZ.BR's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VERIZ.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to VERIZ.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check VERIZ.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs DTEL.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, DTEL.BR has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while DTEL.BR trades at €20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DTEL.BR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DTEL.BR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to DTEL.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check DTEL.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs ORA.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ORA.PA has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while ORA.PA trades at €17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ORA.PA's P/E ratio is 147.25. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ORA.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to ORA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check ORA.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs TFA.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, TFA.BR has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while TFA.BR trades at €3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TFA.BR's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TFA.BR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to TFA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check TFA.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs KPN.AS Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, KPN.AS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while KPN.AS trades at €4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KPN.AS's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KPN.AS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to KPN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check KPN.AS's competition here
LLN.MC vs IAM.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, IAM.PA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while IAM.PA trades at €9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IAM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IAM.PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC and IAM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IAM.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs TIT.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, TIT.BR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while TIT.BR trades at €0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TIT.BR's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TIT.BR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to TIT.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check TIT.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs NOS.LS Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, NOS.LS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while NOS.LS trades at €5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NOS.LS's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOS.LS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to NOS.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check NOS.LS's competition here
LLN.MC vs TNET.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, TNET.BR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while TNET.BR trades at €21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TNET.BR's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TNET.BR's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to TNET.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check TNET.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs PROX.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PROX.BR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while PROX.BR trades at €6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PROX.BR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PROX.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to PROX.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check PROX.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs VEON.AS Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, VEON.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while VEON.AS trades at €1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VEON.AS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VEON.AS's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC and VEON.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEON.AS's competition here
LLN.MC vs OBEL.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, OBEL.BR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while OBEL.BR trades at €21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas OBEL.BR's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OBEL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to OBEL.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check OBEL.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs TISN.BR Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, TISN.BR has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while TISN.BR trades at €0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TISN.BR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TISN.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to TISN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check TISN.BR's competition here
LLN.MC vs PHR.LS Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PHR.LS has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while PHR.LS trades at €0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PHR.LS's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PHR.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to PHR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check PHR.LS's competition here
LLN.MC vs ALOSM.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ALOSM.PA has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while ALOSM.PA trades at €15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ALOSM.PA's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALOSM.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC and ALOSM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALOSM.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs ALBUD.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ALBUD.PA has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while ALBUD.PA trades at €3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ALBUD.PA's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALBUD.PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to ALBUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check ALBUD.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs ALLLN.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ALLLN.PA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while ALLLN.PA trades at €1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ALLLN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALLLN.PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC and ALLLN.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALLLN.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs PAR.MC Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, PAR.MC has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while PAR.MC trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PAR.MC's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PAR.MC's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to PAR.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check PAR.MC's competition here
LLN.MC vs ALBDM.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ALBDM.PA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while ALBDM.PA trades at €5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ALBDM.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALBDM.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to ALBDM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check ALBDM.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs MLWEA.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, MLWEA.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while MLWEA.PA trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MLWEA.PA's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MLWEA.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC and MLWEA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLWEA.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs MLNEO.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, MLNEO.PA has a market cap of 194.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while MLNEO.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MLNEO.PA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MLNEO.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to MLNEO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check MLNEO.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs BUDBS.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, BUDBS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while BUDBS.PA trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BUDBS.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BUDBS.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to BUDBS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check BUDBS.PA's competition here
LLN.MC vs ILD.PA Comparison May 2026
LLN.MC plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLN.MC stands at 18.2M. In comparison, ILD.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LLN.MC is priced at €1.15, while ILD.PA trades at €182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLN.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ILD.PA's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, LLN.MC's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ILD.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLN.MC is less volatile compared to ILD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLN.MC.Check ILD.PA's competition here