Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TIRUPATIFL.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TIRUPATIFL.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIRUPATIFL.NS | ₹64.68 | -2.00% | 8.2B | 126.82 | ₹0.51 | N/A |
| BHARATFORG.BO | ₹1,709.60 | -1.60% | 837.8B | 65.78 | ₹25.99 | +0.50% |
| BHARATFORG.NS | ₹1,711.20 | -1.71% | 836.2B | 65.76 | ₹26.02 | +0.50% |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹23,455.00 | -6.61% | 392.1B | 295.04 | ₹83.87 | N/A |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹23,481.90 | -6.62% | 389.1B | 293.85 | ₹84.27 | N/A |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,762.00 | -3.08% | 166.3B | 50.66 | ₹34.78 | +0.23% |
| RKFORGE.BO | ₹591.05 | -3.71% | 107.8B | 152.81 | ₹3.87 | +0.17% |
| RKFORGE.NS | ₹591.10 | -3.81% | 107.7B | 95.83 | ₹6.17 | +0.17% |
| OMNI.BO | ₹635.90 | -7.55% | 78.6B | 75.52 | ₹8.42 | N/A |
| OMNI.NS | ₹635.60 | -7.24% | 78.2B | 75.10 | ₹8.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Bharat Forge Limited (BSE: BHARATFORG.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BHARATFORG.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 837.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,709.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 65.78. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here
Bharat Forge Limited (NSE: BHARATFORG.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BHARATFORG.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 836.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,711.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 65.76. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here
PTC Industries Limited (NSE: PTCIL.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs PTCIL.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 392.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹23,455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 295.04. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
PTC Industries Limited (BSE: PTCIL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs PTCIL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 389.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹23,481.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 293.85. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
Happy Forgings Limited (NSE: HAPPYFORGE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,762.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 50.66. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
Ramkrishna Forgings Limited (BSE: RKFORGE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RKFORGE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RKFORGE.BO has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RKFORGE.BO trades at ₹591.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RKFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 152.81. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RKFORGE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RKFORGE.BO's competition here
Ramkrishna Forgings Limited (NSE: RKFORGE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RKFORGE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RKFORGE.NS has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RKFORGE.NS trades at ₹591.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RKFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 95.83. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RKFORGE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RKFORGE.NS's competition here
Omnitech Engineering Limited (BSE: OMNI.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs OMNI.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, OMNI.BO has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while OMNI.BO trades at ₹635.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas OMNI.BO's P/E ratio is 75.52. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMNI.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to OMNI.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check OMNI.BO's competition here
Omnitech Engineering Limited (NSE: OMNI.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs OMNI.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, OMNI.NS has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while OMNI.NS trades at ₹635.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas OMNI.NS's P/E ratio is 75.10. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMNI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to OMNI.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check OMNI.NS's competition here
Tembo Global Industries Limited (NSE: TEMBO.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs TEMBO.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹50.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here
RHI Magnesita India Limited (NSE: RHIM.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RHIM.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹351.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
RHI Magnesita India Limited (BSE: RHIM.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RHIM.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹351.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
Aeroflex Industries Limited (NSE: AEROFLEX.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹451.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 87.46. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
Aeroflex Industries Limited (BSE: AEROFLEX.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹451.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 87.55. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
Skipper Ltd (BSE: SKIPPER.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹474.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
Skipper Ltd (NSE: SKIPPER.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹473.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
Shivalik Bimetal Controls Limited (NSE: SBCL.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SBCL.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹902.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
Shivalik Bimetal Controls Limited (BSE: SBCL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SBCL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹901.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 48.75. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
Balu Forge Industries Limited (NSE: BALUFORGE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹422.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
Balu Forge Industries Limited (BSE: BALUFORGE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BALUFORGE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹421.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here
Rolex Rings Limited (NSE: ROLEXRINGS.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹155.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
Dee Development Engineers Ltd. (NSE: DEEDEV.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹534.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
John Cockerill India Ltd. (BSE: COCKERILL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹6,750.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is -227.28. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Industries Limited (NSE: KIRLOSIND.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs KIRLOSIND.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹3,042.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Industries Limited (BSE: KIRLOSIND.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹3,043.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
M M Forgings Limited (NSE: MMFL.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MMFL.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹479.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MMFL.NS's competition here
M M Forgings Limited (BSE: MMFL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MMFL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹477.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
AMIC Forging Ltd (BSE: AMIC.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AMIC.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹2,011.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 76.58. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
Shivalik Bimetal Controls Limited (BSE: SHBCLQ.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
Sundaram-Clayton Limited (NSE: SUNCLAY.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,043.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
Sundaram-Clayton Limited (BSE: SUNCLAY.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SUNCLAY.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUNCLAY.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SUNCLAY.BO trades at ₹1,031.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SUNCLAY.BO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNCLAY.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAY.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SUNCLAY.BO's competition here
Frontier Springs Limited (BSE: FRONTSP.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹1,292.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
Investment & Precision Castings Limited (BSE: INVPRECQ.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹1,378.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 94.56. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
Ardee Industries Limited (NSE: ARDEE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ARDEE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARDEE.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ARDEE.NS trades at ₹42.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ARDEE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARDEE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ARDEE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ARDEE.NS's competition here
Ardee Industries Limited (BSE: ARDEE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ARDEE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARDEE.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ARDEE.BO trades at ₹42.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ARDEE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARDEE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ARDEE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ARDEE.BO's competition here
Alicon Castalloy Limited (BSE: ALICON.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ALICON.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹801.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
Alicon Castalloy Limited (NSE: ALICON.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ALICON.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹801.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
Manaksia Coated Metals & Industries Limited (BSE: MANAKCOAT.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹121.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
Manaksia Coated Metals & Industries Limited (NSE: MANAKCOAT.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹120.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
Nelcast Limited (NSE: NELCAST.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs NELCAST.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹119.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
Nelcast Limited (BSE: NELCAST.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs NELCAST.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹119.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
Gandhi Special Tubes Limited (NSE: GANDHITUBE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹838.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
Gandhi Special Tubes Limited (BSE: GANDHITUBE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹843.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
Pradeep Metals Limited (BSE: PRADPME.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs PRADPME.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
Synergy Green Industries Limited (NSE: SGIL.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SGIL.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹572.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is -104.72. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
Synergy Green Industries Limited (BSE: SGIL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SGIL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹565.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is -100.10. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
Rajratan Global Wire Limited (BSE: RAJGLOWIR.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
Baheti Recycling Industries Ltd. (NSE: BAHETI.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BAHETI.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BAHETI.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BAHETI.NS trades at ₹704.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BAHETI.NS's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BAHETI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BAHETI.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BAHETI.NS's competition here
Uni Abex Alloy Products Limited (BSE: UNIABEXAL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹3,860.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
Captain Technocast Limited (BSE: CTCL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs CTCL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.81. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
Magna Electro Castings Limited (BSE: MAGNAELQ.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹1,225.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
Simplex Castings Limited (BSE: SIMPLEXCAS.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹118.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
Rolex Rings Limited (BSE: ROLEXRINGS.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹155.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
Manaksia Limited (NSE: MANAKSIA.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹50.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
Manaksia Limited (BSE: MANAKSIA.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹50.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
Galaxy Bearings Limited (BSE: GALXBRG.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹988.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 84.81. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
Tamboli Industries Ltd. (BSE: TAMBOLIIN.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs TAMBOLIIN.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, TAMBOLIIN.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while TAMBOLIIN.BO trades at ₹305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas TAMBOLIIN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to TAMBOLIIN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check TAMBOLIIN.BO's competition here
National Fittings Limited (BSE: NATFIT.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs NATFIT.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹318.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
LGB Forge Limited (NSE: LGBFORGE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -267.11. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
D.P. Wires Limited (BSE: DPWIRES.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹178.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
D.P. Wires Limited (NSE: DPWIRES.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹179.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
Krishca Strapping Solutions Ltd. (NSE: KRISHCA.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs KRISHCA.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KRISHCA.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while KRISHCA.NS trades at ₹174.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas KRISHCA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRISHCA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHCA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check KRISHCA.NS's competition here
Atmastco Ltd. (NSE: ATMASTCO.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ATMASTCO.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ATMASTCO.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ATMASTCO.NS trades at ₹97.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ATMASTCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATMASTCO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ATMASTCO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ATMASTCO.NS's competition here
SKP Bearing Industries Ltd. (NSE: SKP.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SKP.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SKP.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SKP.NS trades at ₹143.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SKP.NS's P/E ratio is 403.18. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SKP.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SKP.NS's competition here
Jainam Ferro Alloys (India) Ltd. (NSE: JAINAM.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs JAINAM.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JAINAM.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while JAINAM.NS trades at ₹201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas JAINAM.NS's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JAINAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to JAINAM.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check JAINAM.NS's competition here
Simmonds Marshall Limited (BSE: SIMMOND.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹202.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
Manaksia Coated Metals & Industries Limited (BSE: MNKCMILTD.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MNKCMILTD.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MNKCMILTD.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MNKCMILTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MNKCMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 125.80. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNKCMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to MNKCMILTD.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MNKCMILTD.BO's competition here
Rapicut Carbides Limited (BSE: RAPICUT.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
Galaxy Agrico Exports Limited (BSE: GALAGEX.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹100.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
Cosmo Ferrites Limited (BSE: COSMOFE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -238.16. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
Belding India Limited (BSE: SYNTHFO.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹859.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is -1323.08. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
Amba Enterprises Limited (BSE: AEL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AEL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AEL.BO trades at ₹109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AEL.BO's competition here
Krishanveer Forge Ltd. (BSE: KVFORGE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹124.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
DCM Limited (BSE: DCM.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DCM.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DCM.BO trades at ₹71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DCM.BO's competition here
Alphalogic Industries Ltd. (BSE: ALPHAIND.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
DCM Limited (NSE: DCM.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DCM.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DCM.NS trades at ₹70.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 107.72. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DCM.NS's competition here
LGB Forge Limited (BSE: LGBFORGE.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
Alliance Integrated Metaliks Limited (BSE: AIML.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AIML.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AIML.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AIML.BO trades at ₹2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AIML.BO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIML.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to AIML.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AIML.BO's competition here
Smiths & Founders (India) Limited (BSE: SMFIL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SMFIL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 929.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.60. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
Pattech Fitwell Tube Components Ltd. (NSE: PATTECH.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs PATTECH.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, PATTECH.NS has a market cap of 846.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while PATTECH.NS trades at ₹109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas PATTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to PATTECH.NS. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check PATTECH.NS's competition here
Mauria Udyog Limited (BSE: MUL.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs MUL.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 773.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while MUL.BO trades at ₹5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check MUL.BO's competition here
Satani Bearings Limited (BSE: DECANBRG.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -325.60. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
Delta Manufacturing Limited (BSE: DELTAMAGNT.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DELTAMAGNT.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DELTAMAGNT.BO has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DELTAMAGNT.BO trades at ₹54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DELTAMAGNT.BO's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DELTAMAGNT.BO's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DELTAMAGNT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DELTAMAGNT.BO's competition here
Delta Manufacturing Limited (NSE: DELTAMAGNT.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs DELTAMAGNT.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, DELTAMAGNT.NS has a market cap of 571.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while DELTAMAGNT.NS trades at ₹52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas DELTAMAGNT.NS's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DELTAMAGNT.NS's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to DELTAMAGNT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check DELTAMAGNT.NS's competition here
Austin Engineering Co. Ltd. (BSE: AUSTENG.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 474.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹136.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
Hilton Metal Forging Limited (BSE: HILTON.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs HILTON.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
Hilton Metal Forging Limited (NSE: HILTON.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs HILTON.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check HILTON.NS's competition here
Carnation Industries Limited (BSE: CARNATIN.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹103.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -64.41. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
Rolcon Engineering Co. Ltd. (BSE: ROLCOEN.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ROLCOEN.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ROLCOEN.BO has a market cap of 349.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ROLCOEN.BO trades at ₹462.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ROLCOEN.BO's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROLCOEN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to ROLCOEN.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ROLCOEN.BO's competition here
Relicab Cable Manufacturing Limited (BSE: RELICAB.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs RELICAB.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 347.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
Arcotech Ltd. (NSE: ARCOTECH.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
Bombay Wire Ropes Ltd (BSE: BOMBWIR.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
Ganga Forging Limited (NSE: GANGAFORGE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
Metalyst Forgings Limited (NSE: METALFORGE.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
Bil Energy Systems Ltd. (NSE: BILENERGY.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs BILENERGY.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here
Shivagrico Implements Limited (BSE: SHIVAGR.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
Amforge Industries Limited (BSE: AMFORG.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs AMFORG.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 79.53. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is similarly volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
Golkonda Aluminium Extrusions Limited (BSE: GOLKONDA.BO)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is -121.83. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
Rohit Ferro-Tech Limited (NSE: ROHITFERRO.NS)
TIRUPATIFL.NS vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison October 2026
Tirupati Forge Limited (NSE: TIRUPATIFL.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIRUPATIFL.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TIRUPATIFL.NS is priced at ₹64.68 on the NSE, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIRUPATIFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.82, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TIRUPATIFL.NS is less volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIRUPATIFL.NS.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here