Textainer Group Holdings Limited
Textainer Group Holdings Limited TGH-PA Peers
See (TGH-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGH-PA | $25.15 | +0.08% | 1.04B | 4.44 | $5.66 | N/A |
| URI | $713.30 | -1.20% | 46.36B | 18.49 | $38.58 | +0.96% |
| AER | $112.73 | +0.57% | 19.90B | 9.96 | $11.32 | +0.91% |
| CTOS-WT | $0.11 | -7.93% | 18.01B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FTAI | $118.35 | +0.46% | 12.14B | 493.13 | $0.24 | +0.76% |
| UHAL-B | $58.34 | -0.60% | 11.58B | 27.65 | $2.11 | N/A |
| UHAL | $65.29 | -0.65% | 11.56B | 30.94 | $2.11 | N/A |
| PONY | $17.17 | -4.35% | 6.72B | -7.15 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| R | $159.89 | +0.05% | 6.61B | 13.95 | $11.46 | +1.95% |
| AL | $57.27 | +0.58% | 6.40B | 9.76 | $5.87 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
TGH-PA vs URI Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, URI has a market cap of 46.36B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while URI trades at $713.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas URI's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to URI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to URI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs AER Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, AER has a market cap of 19.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while AER trades at $112.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas AER's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AER's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to AER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs CTOS-WT Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, CTOS-WT has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while CTOS-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas CTOS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTOS-WT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to CTOS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs FTAI Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, FTAI has a market cap of 12.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while FTAI trades at $118.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas FTAI's P/E ratio is 493.13. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTAI's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to FTAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs UHAL-B Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, UHAL-B has a market cap of 11.58B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while UHAL-B trades at $58.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas UHAL-B's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UHAL-B's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to UHAL-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs UHAL Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, UHAL has a market cap of 11.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while UHAL trades at $65.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas UHAL's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UHAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to UHAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs PONY Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, PONY has a market cap of 6.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while PONY trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas PONY's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PONY's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to PONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs R Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, R has a market cap of 6.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while R trades at $159.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas R's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to R's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to R. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs AL Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, AL has a market cap of 6.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while AL trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas AL's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to AL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs AL-PA Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, AL-PA has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while AL-PA trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas AL-PA's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AL-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to AL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs WSC Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, WSC has a market cap of 5.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while WSC trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas WSC's P/E ratio is 374.56. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to WSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs GATX Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, GATX has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while GATX trades at $149.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas GATX's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to GATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TRTN Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TRTN has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TRTN trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TRTN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to TRTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs HRI Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, HRI has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while HRI trades at $134.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas HRI's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to HRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs CAR Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, CAR has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while CAR trades at $105.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas CAR's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to CAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs HEES Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, HEES has a market cap of 3.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while HEES trades at $95.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas HEES's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HEES's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to HEES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs MGRC Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, MGRC has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while MGRC trades at $114.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas MGRC's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MGRC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to MGRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs FTAIM Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, FTAIM has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while FTAIM trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas FTAIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTAIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to FTAIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs FTAIN Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, FTAIN has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while FTAIN trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas FTAIN's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTAIN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to FTAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs FTAIO Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, FTAIO has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while FTAIO trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas FTAIO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTAIO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to FTAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs FTAIP Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, FTAIP has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while FTAIP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas FTAIP's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTAIP's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is more volatile compared to FTAIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TRTN-PA Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TRTN-PA has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TRTN-PA trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TRTN-PA's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTN-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to TRTN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TRTN-PB Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TRTN-PB has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TRTN-PB trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TRTN-PB's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTN-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to TRTN-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TRTN-PC Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TRTN-PC has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TRTN-PC trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TRTN-PC's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTN-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to TRTN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TRTN-PD Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TRTN-PD has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TRTN-PD trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TRTN-PD's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTN-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to TRTN-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs HTZWW Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, HTZWW has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while HTZWW trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas HTZWW's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTZWW's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to HTZWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TGH Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TGH has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TGH trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TGH's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is more volatile compared to TGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TRTN-PE Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TRTN-PE has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TRTN-PE trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TRTN-PE's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRTN-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to TRTN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs HTZ Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, HTZ has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while HTZ trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas HTZ's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HTZ's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to HTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs RCII Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, RCII has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while RCII trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas RCII's P/E ratio is 81.15. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCII's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to RCII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs CAI Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while CAI trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is more volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs PRG Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while PRG trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs WLFC Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, WLFC has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while WLFC trades at $144.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas WLFC's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WLFC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to WLFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs CTOS Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, CTOS has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while CTOS trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas CTOS's P/E ratio is -33.43. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTOS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to CTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs TGH-PB Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, TGH-PB has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while TGH-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas TGH-PB's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGH-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is more volatile compared to TGH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs ALTG-PA Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, ALTG-PA has a market cap of 804.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while ALTG-PA trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas ALTG-PA's P/E ratio is -39.71. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTG-PA's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to ALTG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs VSTS Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, VSTS has a market cap of 803.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while VSTS trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas VSTS's P/E ratio is -32.11. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to VSTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs AAN Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, AAN has a market cap of 318.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while AAN trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas AAN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to AAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs ALTG Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, ALTG has a market cap of 181.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while ALTG trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas ALTG's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to ALTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs MTMT Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, MTMT has a market cap of 52.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while MTMT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas MTMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTMT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to MTMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs MPU Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, MPU has a market cap of 36.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while MPU trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas MPU's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPU's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to MPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs FPAY Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, FPAY has a market cap of 29.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while FPAY trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas FPAY's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FPAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to FPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs MWG Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, MWG has a market cap of 9.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while MWG trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas MWG's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MWG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to MWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs ZCAR Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, ZCAR has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while ZCAR trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas ZCAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to ZCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs BRDS Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, BRDS has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while BRDS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas BRDS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRDS's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to BRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs HYRE Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, HYRE has a market cap of 486786.00. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while HYRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas HYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HYRE's ROE of -46.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is more volatile compared to HYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.
TGH-PA vs ZCARW Comparison
TGH-PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGH-PA stands at 1.04B. In comparison, ZCARW has a market cap of 1132.00. Regarding current trading prices, TGH-PA is priced at $25.15, while ZCARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGH-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 4.44, whereas ZCARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGH-PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZCARW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TGH-PA is less volatile compared to ZCARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGH-PA.