Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TGB stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SCCO has a market cap of 158.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGB is priced at $7.50, while SCCO trades at $189.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TGB currently has a P/E ratio of 187.75, whereas SCCO's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, TGB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCCO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TGB is more volatile compared to SCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGB.Check SCCO's competition here

TGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TGB stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FCX has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGB is priced at $7.50, while FCX trades at $68.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TGB currently has a P/E ratio of 187.75, whereas FCX's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, TGB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGB is more volatile compared to FCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGB.Check FCX's competition here

TGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TGB stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HBM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TGB is priced at $7.50, while HBM trades at $27.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TGB currently has a P/E ratio of 187.75, whereas HBM's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, TGB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TGB is more volatile compared to HBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGB.Check HBM's competition here

TGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TGB stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ERO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGB is priced at $7.50, while ERO trades at $29.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TGB currently has a P/E ratio of 187.75, whereas ERO's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, TGB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TGB is more volatile compared to ERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGB.Check ERO's competition here

TGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TGB stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGB is priced at $7.50, while IE trades at $11.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TGB currently has a P/E ratio of 187.75, whereas IE's P/E ratio is -38.10. In terms of profitability, TGB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGB is more volatile compared to IE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGB.Check IE's competition here

TGB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TGB stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MTAL-WT has a market cap of 997.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TGB is priced at $7.50, while MTAL-WT trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TGB currently has a P/E ratio of 187.75, whereas MTAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGB's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTAL-WT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGB is more volatile compared to MTAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGB.Check MTAL-WT's competition here