Transwarranty Finance Limited
Transwarranty Finance Limited (TFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFL.BO | ₹12.92 | +0.47% | 707.1M | -9.30 | -₹1.38 | N/A |
| HDFC.NS | ₹2,732.00 | +0.28% | 5.1T | 19.16 | ₹142.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJHFL.NS | ₹86.77 | -1.48% | 726.8B | 29.38 | ₹2.97 | N/A |
| LICHSGFIN.NS | ₹526.15 | +0.31% | 288.7B | 5.26 | ₹99.75 | +1.91% |
| LICHSGFIN.BO | ₹527.70 | +0.55% | 288.5B | 5.26 | ₹99.72 | +1.91% |
| PNBHOUSING.NS | ₹826.20 | -2.67% | 218.1B | 9.99 | ₹83.79 | +0.60% |
| PNBHOUSING.BO | ₹824.55 | -2.78% | 218.1B | 9.99 | ₹83.80 | +0.60% |
| AADHARHFC.NS | ₹454.70 | -5.14% | 203.9B | 20.15 | ₹23.32 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.NS | ₹150.25 | -2.46% | 125.7B | 8.26 | ₹18.73 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.BO | ₹149.50 | -2.86% | 125.7B | 8.26 | ₹18.71 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TFL.BO vs HDFC.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, HDFC.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while HDFC.NS trades at ₹2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas HDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HDFC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to HDFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check HDFC.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs BAJAJHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, BAJAJHFL.NS has a market cap of 726.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while BAJAJHFL.NS trades at ₹86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas BAJAJHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BAJAJHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check BAJAJHFL.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs LICHSGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 288.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while LICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹526.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas LICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs LICHSGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 288.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while LICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹527.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas LICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs PNBHOUSING.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.NS has a market cap of 218.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while PNBHOUSING.NS trades at ₹826.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas PNBHOUSING.NS's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PNBHOUSING.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs PNBHOUSING.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.BO has a market cap of 218.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while PNBHOUSING.BO trades at ₹824.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas PNBHOUSING.BO's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PNBHOUSING.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs AADHARHFC.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, AADHARHFC.NS has a market cap of 203.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while AADHARHFC.NS trades at ₹454.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas AADHARHFC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AADHARHFC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to AADHARHFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check AADHARHFC.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.NS has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while SAMMAANCAP.NS trades at ₹150.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas SAMMAANCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.BO has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while SAMMAANCAP.BO trades at ₹149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas SAMMAANCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs HOMEFIRST.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.BO has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while HOMEFIRST.BO trades at ₹1,200.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas HOMEFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HOMEFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs HOMEFIRST.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.NS has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while HOMEFIRST.NS trades at ₹1,201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas HOMEFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HOMEFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs APTUS.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, APTUS.BO has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while APTUS.BO trades at ₹236.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas APTUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to APTUS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check APTUS.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs APTUS.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, APTUS.NS has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while APTUS.NS trades at ₹237.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas APTUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to APTUS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check APTUS.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs CANFINHOME.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, CANFINHOME.NS has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while CANFINHOME.NS trades at ₹883.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas CANFINHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CANFINHOME.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to CANFINHOME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check CANFINHOME.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs CANFINHOME.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, CANFINHOME.BO has a market cap of 120.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while CANFINHOME.BO trades at ₹883.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas CANFINHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CANFINHOME.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to CANFINHOME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check CANFINHOME.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs AAVAS.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, AAVAS.BO has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while AAVAS.BO trades at ₹1,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas AAVAS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AAVAS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to AAVAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check AAVAS.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs AAVAS.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, AAVAS.NS has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while AAVAS.NS trades at ₹1,262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas AAVAS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AAVAS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to AAVAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check AAVAS.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while IBULHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹164.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas IBULHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while IBULHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹164.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas IBULHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs INDIASHLTR.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.NS has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while INDIASHLTR.NS trades at ₹714.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas INDIASHLTR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INDIASHLTR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs INDIASHLTR.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.BO has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while INDIASHLTR.BO trades at ₹713.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas INDIASHLTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INDIASHLTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs REPCOHOME.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, REPCOHOME.NS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while REPCOHOME.NS trades at ₹384.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas REPCOHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to REPCOHOME.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to REPCOHOME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check REPCOHOME.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs REPCOHOME.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, REPCOHOME.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while REPCOHOME.BO trades at ₹384.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas REPCOHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to REPCOHOME.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to REPCOHOME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check REPCOHOME.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs GICHSGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while GICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹154.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas GICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs GICHSGFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while GICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹154.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas GICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs SRGHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, SRGHFL.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while SRGHFL.NS trades at ₹274.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas SRGHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SRGHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check SRGHFL.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs SRGHFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, SRGHFL.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while SRGHFL.BO trades at ₹274.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas SRGHFL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SRGHFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to SRGHFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check SRGHFL.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs RELHOME.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, RELHOME.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while RELHOME.BO trades at ₹6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas RELHOME.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RELHOME.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to RELHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check RELHOME.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs RHFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, RHFL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while RHFL.BO trades at ₹2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas RHFL.BO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RHFL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to RHFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check RHFL.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs RHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, RHFL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while RHFL.NS trades at ₹2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas RHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -29.87. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RHFL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to RHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check RHFL.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs TFL.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, TFL.NS has a market cap of 695.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while TFL.NS trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas TFL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TFL.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check TFL.NS's competition here
TFL.BO vs RFL.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, RFL.BO has a market cap of 420.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while RFL.BO trades at ₹131.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas RFL.BO's P/E ratio is -200.74. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RFL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to RFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check RFL.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs CMXLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, CMXLTD.BO has a market cap of 330.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while CMXLTD.BO trades at ₹28.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas CMXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -57.10. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CMXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is less volatile compared to CMXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check CMXLTD.BO's competition here
TFL.BO vs DHFL.NS Comparison February 2026
TFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TFL.BO stands at 707.1M. In comparison, DHFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TFL.BO is priced at ₹12.92, while DHFL.NS trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.30, whereas DHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TFL.BO's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DHFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFL.BO is more volatile compared to DHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFL.BO.Check DHFL.NS's competition here