Tembo Global Industries Limited
Tembo Global Industries Limited (TEMBO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TEMBO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEMBO.NS | ₹467.80 | -4.63% | 7.2B | 11.58 | ₹40.37 | +0.19% |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹14,992.40 | -8.68% | 234.1B | 352.22 | ₹44.33 | N/A |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹14,985.00 | -8.87% | 233.9B | 351.40 | ₹44.40 | N/A |
| SANSERA.NS | ₹2,074.50 | -4.97% | 134.4B | 50.98 | ₹42.35 | +0.15% |
| SANSERA.BO | ₹2,075.50 | -4.88% | 134.3B | 51.00 | ₹42.33 | +0.15% |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,156.10 | -5.00% | 111.2B | 38.91 | ₹30.30 | +0.25% |
| GRAVITA.NS | ₹1,318.10 | -7.01% | 102.2B | 26.60 | ₹52.73 | +0.82% |
| GRAVITA.BO | ₹1,318.80 | -7.21% | 101.9B | 26.53 | ₹52.73 | +0.82% |
| KIRLFER.NS | ₹460.05 | +1.74% | 76.6B | 18.57 | ₹24.78 | +1.50% |
| RHIM.NS | ₹337.85 | -4.06% | 69B | 40.20 | ₹8.31 | +0.75% |
Stock Comparison
TEMBO.NS vs PTCIL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 234.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹14,992.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 352.22. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs PTCIL.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 233.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹14,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 351.40. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SANSERA.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 134.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,074.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.98. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SANSERA.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,075.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GRAVITA.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,318.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GRAVITA.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,318.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs KIRLFER.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs RHIM.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹337.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs RHIM.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹337.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs KIRLFER.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹348.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹386.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹238.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 63.31. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹238.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,192.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -134.09. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,464.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs KIRLOSIND.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹2,472.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹688.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹687.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SBCL.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹387.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SBCL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹388.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MMFL.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹371.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MMFL.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MMFL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹369.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹1,227.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AMIC.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,285.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 78.25. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹96.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹96.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs NELCAST.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹114.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs NELCAST.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹114.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ALICON.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹589.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ALICON.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹586.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹760.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹758.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SGIL.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹477.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 92.18. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SGIL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹480.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.82. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹555.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs PRADPME.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹365.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹2,718.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹502.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 51.59. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs TIRUPATIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹40.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs CTCL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹500.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹893.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹1,634.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is -2882.35. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹110.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SKP.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SKP.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SKP.NS trades at ₹140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SKP.NS's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SKP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SKP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SKP.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs KRISHCA.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KRISHCA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while KRISHCA.NS trades at ₹141.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas KRISHCA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KRISHCA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHCA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check KRISHCA.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹126.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹126.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs JAINAM.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, JAINAM.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while JAINAM.NS trades at ₹174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas JAINAM.NS's P/E ratio is -88.72. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JAINAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to JAINAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check JAINAM.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MNKCMILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MNKCMILTD.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MNKCMILTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MNKCMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 125.80. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MNKCMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MNKCMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MNKCMILTD.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.81. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹430.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹127.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs NATFIT.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹147.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AEL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AEL.BO trades at ₹96.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AEL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹111.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -32.94. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs DCM.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while DCM.BO trades at ₹55.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check DCM.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs DCM.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while DCM.NS trades at ₹55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check DCM.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs MUL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while MUL.BO trades at ₹7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check MUL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AUTOPINS.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 945.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 247.39. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SMLT.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 872.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹57.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SMLT.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SMLT.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SMLT.BO has a market cap of 869.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SMLT.BO trades at ₹57.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SMLT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SMLT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to SMLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SMLT.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹146.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs PATTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PATTECH.NS has a market cap of 736.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while PATTECH.NS trades at ₹90.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas PATTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 74.22. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PATTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to PATTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check PATTECH.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -325.60. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs HILTON.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 466.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs HILTON.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check HILTON.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs VISHALBL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SMFIL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 405.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.86. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 364.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹96.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs RELICAB.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -25.54. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is less volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SHREMETAL.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹36.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs BILENERGY.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹42.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AMFORG.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs AANCHALISP.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
TEMBO.NS vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison April 2026
TEMBO.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEMBO.NS stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEMBO.NS is priced at ₹467.80, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEMBO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.58, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, TEMBO.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEMBO.NS is more volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEMBO.NS.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here