Tasmea Ltd
Tasmea Ltd TEA.AX Peers
See (TEA.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEA.AX | $2.70 | +3.85% | 621.27M | 14.21 | $0.19 | +4.26% |
| SGH.AX | $51.77 | -0.21% | 21.07B | 25.89 | $2.00 | +0.58% |
| DOW.AX | $6.17 | +0.49% | 4.14B | 61.70 | $0.10 | +3.53% |
| MND.AX | $17.09 | +2.64% | 1.69B | 22.79 | $0.75 | +3.86% |
| MGH.AX | $4.42 | +1.14% | 1.60B | 21.05 | $0.21 | +1.58% |
| NWH.AX | $2.90 | +2.47% | 1.33B | 11.60 | $0.25 | +5.52% |
| SSM.AX | $1.89 | -1.57% | 1.16B | 37.70 | $0.05 | +2.65% |
| SRG.AX | $1.43 | +1.06% | 860.64M | 20.36 | $0.07 | +3.51% |
| JLG.AX | $2.38 | +1.71% | 673.81M | 17.00 | $0.14 | +3.03% |
| GNP.AX | $3.01 | +0.33% | 542.36M | 23.15 | $0.13 | +0.83% |
Stock Comparison
TEA.AX vs SGH.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, SGH.AX has a market cap of 21.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while SGH.AX trades at $51.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SGH.AX's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGH.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to SGH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs DOW.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, DOW.AX has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while DOW.AX trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas DOW.AX's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOW.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to DOW.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs MND.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, MND.AX has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while MND.AX trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas MND.AX's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MND.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to MND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs MGH.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, MGH.AX has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while MGH.AX trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas MGH.AX's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MGH.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to MGH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs NWH.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, NWH.AX has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while NWH.AX trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas NWH.AX's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NWH.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to NWH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs SSM.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, SSM.AX has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while SSM.AX trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SSM.AX's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SSM.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to SSM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs SRG.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, SRG.AX has a market cap of 860.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while SRG.AX trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SRG.AX's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRG.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to SRG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs JLG.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, JLG.AX has a market cap of 673.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while JLG.AX trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas JLG.AX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JLG.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to JLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs GNP.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, GNP.AX has a market cap of 542.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while GNP.AX trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas GNP.AX's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNP.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to GNP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs CVL.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, CVL.AX has a market cap of 502.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while CVL.AX trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CVL.AX's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVL.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to CVL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs SXE.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, SXE.AX has a market cap of 489.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while SXE.AX trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SXE.AX's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SXE.AX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to SXE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs GNG.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, GNG.AX has a market cap of 466.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while GNG.AX trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas GNG.AX's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GNG.AX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to GNG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs LYL.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, LYL.AX has a market cap of 431.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while LYL.AX trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas LYL.AX's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LYL.AX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to LYL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs DUR.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, DUR.AX has a market cap of 379.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while DUR.AX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas DUR.AX's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DUR.AX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to DUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs ACF.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, ACF.AX has a market cap of 316.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while ACF.AX trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas ACF.AX's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACF.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to ACF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs FWD.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, FWD.AX has a market cap of 262.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while FWD.AX trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas FWD.AX's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FWD.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to FWD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs VYS.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, VYS.AX has a market cap of 213.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while VYS.AX trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas VYS.AX's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VYS.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to VYS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs SND.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, SND.AX has a market cap of 96.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while SND.AX trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SND.AX's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SND.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to SND.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs DRA.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, DRA.AX has a market cap of 81.45M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while DRA.AX trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas DRA.AX's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DRA.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to DRA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs DCG.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, DCG.AX has a market cap of 52.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while DCG.AX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas DCG.AX's P/E ratio is -29.70. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCG.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to DCG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs MCE.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, MCE.AX has a market cap of 50.36M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while MCE.AX trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas MCE.AX's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCE.AX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to MCE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs DDB.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, DDB.AX has a market cap of 39.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while DDB.AX trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas DDB.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DDB.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to DDB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs AE1.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, AE1.AX has a market cap of 32.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while AE1.AX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas AE1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AE1.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to AE1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs VRS.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, VRS.AX has a market cap of 24.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while VRS.AX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas VRS.AX's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to VRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs RDG.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, RDG.AX has a market cap of 23.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while RDG.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas RDG.AX's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RDG.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to RDG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs VBC.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, VBC.AX has a market cap of 18.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while VBC.AX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas VBC.AX's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VBC.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to VBC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs EVZ.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, EVZ.AX has a market cap of 18.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while EVZ.AX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas EVZ.AX's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVZ.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to EVZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs SOP.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, SOP.AX has a market cap of 12.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while SOP.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas SOP.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SOP.AX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to SOP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs WSI.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, WSI.AX has a market cap of 8.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while WSI.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas WSI.AX's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WSI.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to WSI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs VMG.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, VMG.AX has a market cap of 6.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while VMG.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas VMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VMG.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to VMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs CDD.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, CDD.AX has a market cap of 5.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while CDD.AX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas CDD.AX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDD.AX's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to CDD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs BSA.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, BSA.AX has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while BSA.AX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas BSA.AX's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BSA.AX's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is more volatile compared to BSA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.
TEA.AX vs PKD.AX Comparison
TEA.AX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEA.AX stands at 621.27M. In comparison, PKD.AX has a market cap of 3.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TEA.AX is priced at $2.70, while PKD.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.21, whereas PKD.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TEA.AX's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PKD.AX's ROE of -44.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEA.AX is less volatile compared to PKD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEA.AX.