SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See SHA.AX's competitors and their performance on the ASX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for SHA.AX and its ASX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHA.AX | A$6.78 | +2.42% | 568.7M | 22.24 | A$0.30 | +3.91% |
| SGH.AX | A$41.47 | -0.86% | 16.9B | 32.69 | A$1.27 | +1.50% |
| WOR.AX | A$10.90 | +0.46% | 5.5B | 16.57 | A$0.66 | +4.59% |
| DOW.AX | A$7.45 | +0.13% | 4.9B | 26.34 | A$0.28 | +3.62% |
| NWH.AX | A$7.09 | -2.07% | 3.3B | 55.18 | A$0.13 | +2.54% |
| MND.AX | A$31.19 | -0.19% | 3.1B | 29.49 | A$1.06 | +2.82% |
| TEA.AX | A$9.22 | +1.43% | 2.5B | 43.59 | A$0.21 | +2.39% |
| SRG.AX | A$3.96 | +9.39% | 2.5B | 39.15 | A$0.10 | +1.52% |
| MGH.AX | A$5.70 | -0.70% | 2.1B | 25.39 | A$0.22 | +1.23% |
| GNP.AX | A$9.47 | -2.07% | 1.7B | 37.33 | A$0.25 | +0.59% |
Stock Comparison
SGH Limited (ASX: SGH.AX)
SHA.AX vs SGH.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, SGH.AX has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while SGH.AX trades at A$41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SGH.AX's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SGH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to SGH.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check SGH.AX's competition here
Worley Limited (ASX: WOR.AX)
SHA.AX vs WOR.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, WOR.AX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while WOR.AX trades at A$10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas WOR.AX's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WOR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to WOR.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check WOR.AX's competition here
Downer EDI Ltd (ASX: DOW.AX)
SHA.AX vs DOW.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, DOW.AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while DOW.AX trades at A$7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DOW.AX's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DOW.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to DOW.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check DOW.AX's competition here
NRW Holdings Limited (ASX: NWH.AX)
SHA.AX vs NWH.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, NWH.AX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while NWH.AX trades at A$7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas NWH.AX's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NWH.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to NWH.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check NWH.AX's competition here
Monadelphous Group Limited (ASX: MND.AX)
SHA.AX vs MND.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, MND.AX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while MND.AX trades at A$31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MND.AX's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MND.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to MND.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check MND.AX's competition here
Tasmea Ltd (ASX: TEA.AX)
SHA.AX vs TEA.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, TEA.AX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while TEA.AX trades at A$9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas TEA.AX's P/E ratio is 43.59. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TEA.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to TEA.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check TEA.AX's competition here
SRG Global Limited (ASX: SRG.AX)
SHA.AX vs SRG.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, SRG.AX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while SRG.AX trades at A$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SRG.AX's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SRG.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to SRG.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check SRG.AX's competition here
MAAS Group Holdings Limited (ASX: MGH.AX)
SHA.AX vs MGH.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, MGH.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while MGH.AX trades at A$5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MGH.AX's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MGH.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to MGH.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check MGH.AX's competition here
GenusPlus Group Limited (ASX: GNP.AX)
SHA.AX vs GNP.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, GNP.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while GNP.AX trades at A$9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas GNP.AX's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GNP.AX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to GNP.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check GNP.AX's competition here
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering Limited (ASX: SXE.AX)
SHA.AX vs SXE.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, SXE.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while SXE.AX trades at A$4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SXE.AX's P/E ratio is 366.14. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SXE.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to SXE.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check SXE.AX's competition here
FDC Consolidated Holdings Ltd. (ASX: FDC.AX)
SHA.AX vs FDC.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, FDC.AX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while FDC.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas FDC.AX's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FDC.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to FDC.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check FDC.AX's competition here
Johns Lyng Group Limited (ASX: JLG.AX)
SHA.AX vs JLG.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, JLG.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while JLG.AX trades at A$3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JLG.AX's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to JLG.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to JLG.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check JLG.AX's competition here
GR Engineering Services Limited (ASX: GNG.AX)
SHA.AX vs GNG.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, GNG.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while GNG.AX trades at A$6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas GNG.AX's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GNG.AX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to GNG.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check GNG.AX's competition here
Civmec Limited (ASX: CVL.AX)
SHA.AX vs CVL.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, CVL.AX has a market cap of 956.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while CVL.AX trades at A$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CVL.AX's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CVL.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to CVL.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check CVL.AX's competition here
Lycopodium Limited (ASX: LYL.AX)
SHA.AX vs LYL.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, LYL.AX has a market cap of 747.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while LYL.AX trades at A$18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LYL.AX's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LYL.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to LYL.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check LYL.AX's competition here
Vysarn Ltd (ASX: VYS.AX)
SHA.AX vs VYS.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, VYS.AX has a market cap of 582.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while VYS.AX trades at A$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas VYS.AX's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VYS.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to VYS.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check VYS.AX's competition here
Duratec Limited (ASX: DUR.AX)
SHA.AX vs DUR.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, DUR.AX has a market cap of 575.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while DUR.AX trades at A$2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DUR.AX's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DUR.AX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to DUR.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check DUR.AX's competition here
Acrow Limited (ASX: ACF.AX)
SHA.AX vs ACF.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, ACF.AX has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while ACF.AX trades at A$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ACF.AX's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACF.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to ACF.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check ACF.AX's competition here
Fleetwood Limited (ASX: FWD.AX)
SHA.AX vs FWD.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, FWD.AX has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while FWD.AX trades at A$2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas FWD.AX's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FWD.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to FWD.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check FWD.AX's competition here
Mastermyne Group Limited (ASX: MYE.AX)
SHA.AX vs MYE.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, MYE.AX has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while MYE.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MYE.AX's P/E ratio is 77.70. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MYE.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to MYE.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check MYE.AX's competition here
Saunders International Limited (ASX: SND.AX)
SHA.AX vs SND.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, SND.AX has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while SND.AX trades at A$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SND.AX's P/E ratio is 88.18. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SND.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to SND.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check SND.AX's competition here
Matrix Composites & Engineering Ltd (ASX: MCE.AX)
SHA.AX vs MCE.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, MCE.AX has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while MCE.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MCE.AX's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MCE.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to MCE.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check MCE.AX's competition here
DRA Global Limited (ASX: DRA.AX)
SHA.AX vs DRA.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, DRA.AX has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while DRA.AX trades at A$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DRA.AX's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DRA.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to DRA.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check DRA.AX's competition here
EVZ Limited (ASX: EVZ.AX)
SHA.AX vs EVZ.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, EVZ.AX has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while EVZ.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas EVZ.AX's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EVZ.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to EVZ.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check EVZ.AX's competition here
Decmil Group Limited (ASX: DCG.AX)
SHA.AX vs DCG.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, DCG.AX has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while DCG.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DCG.AX's P/E ratio is -29.70. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DCG.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to DCG.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check DCG.AX's competition here
Verbrec Limited (ASX: VBC.AX)
SHA.AX vs VBC.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, VBC.AX has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while VBC.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas VBC.AX's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VBC.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to VBC.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check VBC.AX's competition here
Dynamic Group Holdings Limited (ASX: DDB.AX)
SHA.AX vs DDB.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, DDB.AX has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while DDB.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DDB.AX's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DDB.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to DDB.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check DDB.AX's competition here
The Environmental Group Limited (ASX: EGL.AX)
SHA.AX vs EGL.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, EGL.AX has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while EGL.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas EGL.AX's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EGL.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to EGL.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check EGL.AX's competition here
Aerison Group Ltd (ASX: AE1.AX)
SHA.AX vs AE1.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, AE1.AX has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while AE1.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas AE1.AX's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AE1.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to AE1.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check AE1.AX's competition here
Aerometrex Limited (ASX: AMX.AX)
SHA.AX vs AMX.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, AMX.AX has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while AMX.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas AMX.AX's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMX.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to AMX.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check AMX.AX's competition here
Veris Limited (ASX: VRS.AX)
SHA.AX vs VRS.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, VRS.AX has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while VRS.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas VRS.AX's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VRS.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to VRS.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check VRS.AX's competition here
Synertec Corporation Limited (ASX: SOP.AX)
SHA.AX vs SOP.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, SOP.AX has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while SOP.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SOP.AX's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SOP.AX's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to SOP.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check SOP.AX's competition here
Resource Development Group Limited (ASX: RDG.AX)
SHA.AX vs RDG.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, RDG.AX has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while RDG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas RDG.AX's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RDG.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to RDG.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check RDG.AX's competition here
BSA Limited (ASX: BSA.AX)
SHA.AX vs BSA.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, BSA.AX has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while BSA.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BSA.AX's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BSA.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to BSA.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check BSA.AX's competition here
WestStar Industrial Limited (ASX: WSI.AX)
SHA.AX vs WSI.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, WSI.AX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while WSI.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas WSI.AX's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WSI.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to WSI.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check WSI.AX's competition here
VDM Group Limited (ASX: VMG.AX)
SHA.AX vs VMG.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, VMG.AX has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while VMG.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas VMG.AX's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VMG.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to VMG.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check VMG.AX's competition here
Cardno Limited (ASX: CDD.AX)
SHA.AX vs CDD.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, CDD.AX has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while CDD.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CDD.AX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CDD.AX's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is less volatile compared to CDD.AX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check CDD.AX's competition here
PARKD Limited (ASX: PKD.AX)
SHA.AX vs PKD.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, PKD.AX has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while PKD.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas PKD.AX's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PKD.AX's ROE of -26.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to PKD.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check PKD.AX's competition here
Service Stream Ltd. (ASX: STR.AX)
SHA.AX vs STR.AX Comparison August 2026
SHAPE Australia Corporation Limited (ASX: SHA.AX) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the ASX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHA.AX stands at 568.7M. In comparison, STR.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHA.AX is priced at A$6.78 on the ASX, while STR.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas STR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHA.AX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STR.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHA.AX is more volatile compared to STR.AX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHA.AX.Check STR.AX's competition here