TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF
TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCLV.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCLV.TO | CA$24.90 | +0.00% | 55.3M | 23.64 | CA$1.05 | +2.25% |
| BLK.NE | CA$29.25 | -0.10% | 232B | 25.99 | CA$1.12 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$92.87 | +0.00% | 147.2B | 223.25 | CA$0.40 | +0.53% |
| BAM.TO | CA$86.53 | +0.00% | 135.1B | 41.48 | CA$2.02 | +2.73% |
| VFV.TO | CA$154.69 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 27.59 | CA$5.61 | +0.99% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$95.41 | +0.00% | 19B | N/A | N/A | +0.88% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$35.57 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 3.79 | CA$9.48 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$42.15 | +0.00% | 14.7B | 20.65 | CA$2.03 | +2.70% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.77 | +0.00% | 12.8B | 17.10 | CA$2.52 | +2.59% |
| VUN.TO | CA$116.19 | +0.00% | 12B | 26.82 | CA$4.33 | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
TCLV.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 232B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while BLK.NE trades at CA$29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here
TCLV.TO vs BN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while BN.TO trades at CA$92.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 223.25. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while BAM.TO trades at CA$86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VFV.TO trades at CA$154.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$95.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZSP.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XIU.TO trades at CA$42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XEF.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VUN.TO trades at CA$116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VUN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while IGM.TO trades at CA$46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZCN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZEA.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VCN.TO trades at CA$57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VCN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XUS.TO trades at CA$54.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XUS.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XIC.TO trades at CA$44.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XIC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XSP.TO trades at CA$65.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XSP.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CEF.TO trades at CA$42.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XEQT.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$111.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$49.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CASH.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VIU.TO trades at CA$39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VIU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZMMK.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VSP.TO trades at CA$101.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while HXS.TO trades at CA$89.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check HXS.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XSEM.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while HXT.TO trades at CA$73.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while QUU.TO trades at CA$252.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check QUU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$46.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZEB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VDY.TO trades at CA$53.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VDY.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XQQ.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XUU.TO trades at CA$64.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XUU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$86.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZUE.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while TPU.TO trades at CA$49.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check TPU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while TTP.TO trades at CA$31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check TTP.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XGRO.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZWB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while TPE.TO trades at CA$25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XAW.TO trades at CA$47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -50.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check BBUC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VEE.TO trades at CA$41.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VEE.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XBB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XDIV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XEC.TO trades at CA$32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XEC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VXC.TO trades at CA$68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VXC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$160.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZQQ.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs SII.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while SII.TO trades at CA$93.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VCE.TO trades at CA$61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VCE.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$56.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while QCN.TO trades at CA$170.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check QCN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XBAL.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while QQC.TO trades at CA$38.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check QQC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check MNY.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VGG.TO trades at CA$96.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VGG.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XEI.TO trades at CA$29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XEI.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CMR.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$116.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check HSAV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZWU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XIN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CACB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XFH.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 38.06. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XFN.TO trades at CA$66.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XFN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CYB.TO trades at CA$81.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ISIF.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check CBIL.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZWC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check HXCN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while UNC.TO trades at CA$14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XSH.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XGB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZEM.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZGB.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO and HMAX.TO have similar daily volatility (0.48).Check HMAX.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZPR.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while EQL.TO trades at CA$38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check EQL.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XWD.TO trades at CA$101.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XWD.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check RIIN.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs FCUQ.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$65.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while VUS.TO trades at CA$109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check VUS.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs DCU.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check DCU.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$89.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZUQ.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while QDX.TO trades at CA$133.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check QDX.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs ZDM.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, ZDM.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while ZDM.TO trades at CA$31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas ZDM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZDM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to ZDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check ZDM.TO's competition here
TCLV.TO vs BND.TO Comparison August 2025
TCLV.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCLV.TO stands at 55.3M. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLV.TO is priced at CA$24.90, while BND.TO trades at CA$18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCLV.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.64, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLV.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLV.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLV.TO.Check BND.TO's competition here