Technicolor SA

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 485.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NFLX trades at $1,140.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 190.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while DIS trades at $105.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 55.74B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while UMGNF trades at $30.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 55.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while UNVGY trades at $15.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 31.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LYV trades at $136.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 46.28. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 30.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FWONA trades at $87.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is -672.23. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 30.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FWONK trades at $95.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is -794.50. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 27.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FWONB trades at $80.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is -619.23. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FWONB's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 22.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while WBD trades at $9.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 21.96B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FOXA trades at $50.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 21.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FOX trades at $46.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VIAC trades at $29.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 17.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BOIVF trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 105.92. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 16.97B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NWS trades at $32.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 16.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NWSA trades at $28.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while WMG trades at $27.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to WMG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.07B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TKO trades at $159.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 7992.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CEVMY trades at $31.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CEVMF trades at $110.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while EDR trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ROKU has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ROKU trades at $60.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ROKU's P/E ratio is -83.47. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ROKU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ROKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while PARA trades at $11.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.39B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while PARAP trades at $13.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while WWE trades at $100.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while PARAA trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SIRI trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TKCOF trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LLYVK trades at $75.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is -227.52. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 6.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LLYVA trades at $74.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is -217.74. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NXST trades at $164.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MSGS trades at $191.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 913.24. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TOEAF trades at $21.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CNK trades at $31.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VIVHY trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MCOIF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BATRK trades at $40.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BATRA trades at $43.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -86.98. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MANU trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MCHOY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while APE trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MHSDF trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LION trades at $7.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BOWL trades at $11.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BOWL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MSGE trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NANHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NENTY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while IMAX trades at $26.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ATVDY trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while JVTSF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AMC trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SPHR trades at $32.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AIOSF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SBGI trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 809.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HUYA trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -120.67. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 685.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while PLAY trades at $19.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 671.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 525.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MCS trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -67.76. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 469.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RSVR trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 445.26M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CPXGF trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 413.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BORUF trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BORUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 305.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while IMXCF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 284.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AMCX trades at $6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 275.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while WLDBF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +30.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LIVX trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 258.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while IQ trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.08M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CLQDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 192.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AFCJF trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -19.09. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 188.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CLTFF trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 162.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NENTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 131.88M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GAIA trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 129.43M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AENT trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 112.81M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while APTTF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to APTTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 107.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while DTTVY trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GNUS trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GNUS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 101.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GOAI trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GOAI's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.71M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while STEAF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 75.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RSVRW trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 69.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LVO trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 62.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AGAE trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CIDM trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 46.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RDI trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RDI's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 44.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CNVS trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 44.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RDIB trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 38.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ANGH trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ANGH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 37.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while THBRF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 34.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LGMH trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 29.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TOON trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 28.27M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NIPG trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 28.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while APHP trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to APHP's ROE of +55.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 24.55M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while OAMCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to OAMCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 20.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ADD trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 18.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while QYOUF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 17.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ICABY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MMV trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.77M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 13.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while KUKE trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while DLPN trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 12.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HWAL trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BBOP trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BBOP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CSCW trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 10.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MVNC trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 9.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AENTW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CPOP trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 7.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LTES trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LTES's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CNNWQ has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CNNWQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNNWQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CNNWQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CNNWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BREA trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HHSE trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 6.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AMFL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HOFV trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 4.99M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ICABF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 4.75M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 3.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ENTEF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ENTEF's ROE of -7.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CSSE trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CAPV trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while STGZ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.46M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ITVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BZFDW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 2.32M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HQGE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BLMZ trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while EEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.61M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HDUP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BSEG trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NETWF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while STCXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to STCXF's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 978710.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925286.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AFOM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 843035.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while UMGP trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 738565.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VNUE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AMNNF has a market cap of 736064.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AMNNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMNNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AMNNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AMNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 668740.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GULDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 631516.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RLTR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499820.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CCLX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 496891.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while WRIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463682.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TAMG trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 460484.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BOTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389826.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while WEBB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 360200.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VGTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313681.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while IMTV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260304.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CEXE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CEXE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 258474.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TRMNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258051.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, BRSE has a market cap of 255530.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while BRSE trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to BRSE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to BRSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244876.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RIVU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222700.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MIKP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148773.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MLFB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112921.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SNMN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 109089.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RWMI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 81392.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SAPX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63000.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while URBT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to URBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58008.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SVSN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SVSN's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57053.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GBHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 56812.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while PLFX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47158.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AMRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37523.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HOMU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33260.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while XSPT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24129.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while GTOR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to GTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 23278.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SAKL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AMXX has a market cap of 22718.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AMXX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AMXX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to AMXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AVPI has a market cap of 21490.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AVPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AVPI's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AVPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 20766.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, IFLM has a market cap of 19494.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while IFLM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IFLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to IFLM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY and IFLM have similar daily volatility (163.64).

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, NLMP has a market cap of 18998.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while NLMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NLMP's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to NLMP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to NLMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 16004.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SONG trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SONG's ROE of -9.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FMYR has a market cap of 14391.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FMYR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FMYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FMYR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to FMYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SNWR has a market cap of 14002.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SNWR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNWR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SNWR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HYWI has a market cap of 12675.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HYWI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HYWI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HYWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to HYWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AGAEW has a market cap of 8299.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AGAEW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGAEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AGAEW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AGAEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AFTM has a market cap of 7045.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AFTM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AFTM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY and AFTM have similar daily volatility (163.64).

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MVES has a market cap of 5827.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MVES trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MVES's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MVES's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MVES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TCHC has a market cap of 4463.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TCHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HYWS has a market cap of 4362.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HYWS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HYWS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HYWS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is less volatile compared to HYWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, FERL has a market cap of 3390.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while FERL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FERL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to FERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY and FERL have similar daily volatility (163.64).

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, EVLI has a market cap of 3073.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while EVLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to EVLI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to EVLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TCEC has a market cap of 3001.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TCEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TCEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, EMWPF has a market cap of 1895.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while EMWPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to EMWPF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to EMWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TIXC has a market cap of 1734.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TIXC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TIXC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TIXC's ROE of +40.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TIXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SLCH has a market cap of 1550.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SLCH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SLCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SLCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VIDA has a market cap of 1225.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VIDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VIDA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY and VIDA have similar daily volatility (163.64).

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, EWKS has a market cap of 656.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while EWKS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EWKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to EWKS's ROE of -14.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY and EWKS have similar daily volatility (163.64).

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, UOMO has a market cap of 239.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while UOMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UOMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to UOMO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to UOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MOCI has a market cap of 122.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MOCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MOCI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MOCI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MOCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, KLOC has a market cap of 11.00. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while KLOC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KLOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to KLOC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to KLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, LVOPP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while LVOPP trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TCLRY has daily volatility of 163.64 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, DISCK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while DISCK trades at $24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RTRK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RTRK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RTRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RTRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, ESGC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while ESGC trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, AESE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while AESE trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, SWMD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while SWMD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SWMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to SWMD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to SWMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RDBX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RDBX trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VIACP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VIACP trades at $52.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, VIACA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while VIACA trades at $32.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, EMWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while EMWP trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, KWWMF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while KWWMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KWWMF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to KWWMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to KWWMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RDBXW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, RCCB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while RCCB trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to RCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to RCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, MSGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while MSGN trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, DISCB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while DISCB trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, HMTV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while HMTV trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.

TCLRY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TCLRY stands at 852.06M. In comparison, TGSEF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, TCLRY is priced at $0.00, while TGSEF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TCLRY currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TGSEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCLRY's ROE is -2.33%, compared to TGSEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TCLRY is more volatile compared to TGSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCLRY.