Turmalina Metals Corp.
Turmalina Metals Corp. (TBXXF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TBXXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBXXF | $0.83 | +1.59% | 175.1M | -21.07 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $54.35 | +1.78% | 39.8B | 87.02 | $0.62 | +1.64% |
| ANGPY | $16.83 | +4.08% | 26.7B | 339.00 | $0.05 | +3.40% |
| IMPUY | $19.67 | +3.96% | 17.8B | 394.40 | $0.05 | +0.48% |
| IMPUF | $17.15 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.53% |
| MMSMY | $44.00 | +8.24% | 12.6B | 41.12 | $1.07 | +0.42% |
| JINFF | $26.00 | +0.87% | 10.3B | 25.24 | $1.03 | +0.31% |
| GMINF | $38.10 | +3.11% | 8.7B | 33.73 | $1.13 | N/A |
| XZJCF | $130.42 | -28.60% | 7.5B | 24.70 | $5.28 | +0.98% |
| OICT | $11.25 | -2.17% | 6.2B | -38.40 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TBXXF vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while FNLPF trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 87.02. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check FNLPF's competition here
TBXXF vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ANGPY trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 339.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ANGPY's competition here
TBXXF vs IMPUY Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while IMPUY trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 394.40. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check IMPUY's competition here
TBXXF vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while IMPUF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check IMPUF's competition here
TBXXF vs MMSMY Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while MMSMY trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 41.12. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check MMSMY's competition here
TBXXF vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while JINFF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check JINFF's competition here
TBXXF vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while GMINF trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check GMINF's competition here
TBXXF vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while XZJCF trades at $130.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check XZJCF's competition here
TBXXF vs OICT Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while OICT trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -38.40. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check OICT's competition here
TBXXF vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check NMPNF's competition here
TBXXF vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ABBRF trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -113.18. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ABBRF's competition here
TBXXF vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
TBXXF vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check POYYF's competition here
TBXXF vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 956.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while GLGDF trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check GLGDF's competition here
TBXXF vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check AUCOY's competition here
TBXXF vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while TIHRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check TIHRF's competition here
TBXXF vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check FCSUF's competition here
TBXXF vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 482.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while BKRRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -23.26. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check BKRRF's competition here
TBXXF vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SAPLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SAPLF's competition here
TBXXF vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while BRVMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -105.33. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check BRVMF's competition here
TBXXF vs SLVTF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SLVTF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -68.43. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SLVTF's competition here
TBXXF vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check IAUFF's competition here
TBXXF vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check TPRFF's competition here
TBXXF vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while GOTRF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check GOTRF's competition here
TBXXF vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while HGLD trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check HGLD's competition here
TBXXF vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 246.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SMDRF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -154.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SMDRF's competition here
TBXXF vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 244.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PAASF's competition here
TBXXF vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while CHPGF trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -78.80. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check CHPGF's competition here
TBXXF vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SSVFF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SSVFF's competition here
TBXXF vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ORVMF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ORVMF's competition here
TBXXF vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while CAPTF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -167.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check CAPTF's competition here
TBXXF vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check BOCOF's competition here
TBXXF vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SNNGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SNNGF's competition here
TBXXF vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PLLHF's competition here
TBXXF vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check XANAF's competition here
TBXXF vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 129.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while AGLDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check AGLDF's competition here
TBXXF vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while NAUFF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -24.22. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check NAUFF's competition here
TBXXF vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while OCGSF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check OCGSF's competition here
TBXXF vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while EMPYF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check EMPYF's competition here
TBXXF vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SCTSF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SCTSF's competition here
TBXXF vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SDRC trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -288.10. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SDRC's competition here
TBXXF vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check CTNXF's competition here
TBXXF vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PGLDF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PGLDF's competition here
TBXXF vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while TSORF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -92.86. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check TSORF's competition here
TBXXF vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 96.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while TEUTF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check TEUTF's competition here
TBXXF vs LUCRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check LUCRF's competition here
TBXXF vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while LGCXF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check LGCXF's competition here
TBXXF vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while AGMRF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check AGMRF's competition here
TBXXF vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while AMNP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check AMNP's competition here
TBXXF vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while DNCVF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check DNCVF's competition here
TBXXF vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 82.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while VIPRF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check VIPRF's competition here
TBXXF vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ELRFF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ELRFF's competition here
TBXXF vs THMG Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while THMG trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check THMG's competition here
TBXXF vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while KDKCF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -77.40. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check KDKCF's competition here
TBXXF vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while LBCMF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check LBCMF's competition here
TBXXF vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ACRG trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ACRG's competition here
TBXXF vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check HEGLF's competition here
TBXXF vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ARRKF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ARRKF's competition here
TBXXF vs BBBXF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while BBBXF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check BBBXF's competition here
TBXXF vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while EQMEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check EQMEF's competition here
TBXXF vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while MMNGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check MMNGF's competition here
TBXXF vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while VLMGF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -54.58. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check VLMGF's competition here
TBXXF vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while CPPMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check CPPMF's competition here
TBXXF vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while EMPPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check EMPPF's competition here
TBXXF vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while BRGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check BRGC's competition here
TBXXF vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SMOFF's competition here
TBXXF vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ACKRF's competition here
TBXXF vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while DNRSF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check DNRSF's competition here
TBXXF vs PDLMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PDLMF's competition here
TBXXF vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check VTXXF's competition here
TBXXF vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ATEPF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ATEPF's competition here
TBXXF vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check CTMCF's competition here
TBXXF vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while KGFMF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -50.24. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check KGFMF's competition here
TBXXF vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ADYRF's competition here
TBXXF vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while DYNR trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check DYNR's competition here
TBXXF vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check RKHNF's competition here
TBXXF vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PNTRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PNTRF's competition here
TBXXF vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PVGDF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PVGDF's competition here
TBXXF vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SSVRF's competition here
TBXXF vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check HMRRF's competition here
TBXXF vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while MRZLF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check MRZLF's competition here
TBXXF vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check CJIMF's competition here
TBXXF vs RITE Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check RITE's competition here
TBXXF vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while WEXPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check WEXPF's competition here
TBXXF vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check OKPRF's competition here
TBXXF vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while WAMFF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check WAMFF's competition here
TBXXF vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check TLSMF's competition here
TBXXF vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SUNPF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SUNPF's competition here
TBXXF vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TBXXF has daily volatility of 8.83 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
TBXXF vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ESGLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ESGLF's competition here
TBXXF vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check GLDRF's competition here
TBXXF vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check ASLRF's competition here
TBXXF vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of -22.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SBMCF's competition here
TBXXF vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while STRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check STRFF's competition here
TBXXF vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check SHGDF's competition here
TBXXF vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -19.01. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check AUCUF's competition here
TBXXF vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check URVNF's competition here
TBXXF vs PLLMF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while PLLMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is less volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check PLLMF's competition here
TBXXF vs HBEIF Comparison February 2026
TBXXF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBXXF stands at 175.1M. In comparison, HBEIF has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBXXF is priced at $0.83, while HBEIF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBXXF currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas HBEIF's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, TBXXF's ROE is -1.65%, compared to HBEIF's ROE of -4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TBXXF is more volatile compared to HBEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBXXF.Check HBEIF's competition here