Thai Beverage Public Company Limited
Thai Beverage Public Company Limited (TBVPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TBVPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBVPF | $0.32 | +0.00% | 8B | 10.67 | $0.03 | +6.16% |
| DGEAF | $21.16 | +4.68% | 47.7B | 19.88 | $1.08 | +3.87% |
| PRNDY | $15.08 | -0.07% | 19.5B | 11.82 | $1.31 | +7.07% |
| PDRDF | $75.79 | +1.39% | 19.2B | 11.62 | $6.56 | +7.19% |
| DVCMY | $6.59 | -9.60% | 8.9B | 21.86 | $0.34 | +1.56% |
| DVDCF | $6.94 | -4.28% | 8.7B | 21.26 | $0.34 | +1.63% |
| TBVPY | $32.35 | -12.61% | 8.1B | 10.40 | $3.11 | +5.71% |
| EDVGF | $2.42 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 16.10 | $0.15 | +4.84% |
| BCCLF | $0.83 | +6.78% | 3B | 6.46 | $0.13 | +2.42% |
| REMYF | $48.00 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 23.30 | $2.06 | +4.81% |
Stock Comparison
TBVPF vs DGEAF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DGEAF trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DGEAF's competition here
TBVPF vs PRNDY Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while PRNDY trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check PRNDY's competition here
TBVPF vs PDRDF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while PDRDF trades at $75.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check PDRDF's competition here
TBVPF vs DVCMY Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DVCMY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and DVCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVCMY's competition here
TBVPF vs DVDCF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DVDCF trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DVDCF's competition here
TBVPF vs TBVPY Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while TBVPY trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and TBVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBVPY's competition here
TBVPF vs EDVGF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while EDVGF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to EDVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check EDVGF's competition here
TBVPF vs BCCLF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while BCCLF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check BCCLF's competition here
TBVPF vs REMYF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while REMYF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to REMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check REMYF's competition here
TBVPF vs TSRYY Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while TSRYY trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check TSRYY's competition here
TBVPF vs TSRYF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while TSRYF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and TSRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSRYF's competition here
TBVPF vs DSTZF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and DSTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSTZF's competition here
TBVPF vs LPRRF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 787.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and LPRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPRRF's competition here
TBVPF vs GBSMF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and GBSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBSMF's competition here
TBVPF vs CBYDF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 311.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while CBYDF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and CBYDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBYDF's competition here
TBVPF vs CRBBF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while CRBBF trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check CRBBF's competition here
TBVPF vs BVDRF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and BVDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVDRF's competition here
TBVPF vs REMYY Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while REMYY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check REMYY's competition here
TBVPF vs ADWPF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while ADWPF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and ADWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADWPF's competition here
TBVPF vs CWGL Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while CWGL trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 139.00. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check CWGL's competition here
TBVPF vs MJWNY Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while MJWNY trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -35.83. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check MJWNY's competition here
TBVPF vs LRKKF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while LRKKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check LRKKF's competition here
TBVPF vs NWINF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while NWINF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -32.10. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and NWINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWINF's competition here
TBVPF vs CATWF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and CATWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CATWF's competition here
TBVPF vs TNYBF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of -9.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and TNYBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNYBF's competition here
TBVPF vs AUVGF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while AUVGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check AUVGF's competition here
TBVPF vs THST Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THST's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and THST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THST's competition here
TBVPF vs RSAU Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while RSAU trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -22.90. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and RSAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSAU's competition here
TBVPF vs ASCC Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while ASCC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check ASCC's competition here
TBVPF vs IFBC Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, IFBC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while IFBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas IFBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFBC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and IFBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFBC's competition here
TBVPF vs SBDCF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check SBDCF's competition here
TBVPF vs SVIN Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while SVIN trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVIN's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check SVIN's competition here
TBVPF vs EWRC Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and EWRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EWRC's competition here
TBVPF vs MLMN Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 625.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and MLMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLMN's competition here
TBVPF vs SHNJF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 324K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SHNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHNJF's competition here
TBVPF vs SBES Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 289.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBES's ROE of +22.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SBES have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBES's competition here
TBVPF vs DKAM Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 278.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DKAM's competition here
TBVPF vs TGRR Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check TGRR's competition here
TBVPF vs DWWEF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 79.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DWWEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DWWEF's competition here
TBVPF vs DKTS Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 42.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DKTS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DKTS's competition here
TBVPF vs ICNB Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 32.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check ICNB's competition here
TBVPF vs VDKB Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while VDKB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to VDKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check VDKB's competition here
TBVPF vs SLLFF Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while SLLFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLLFF's competition here
TBVPF vs SRSG Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while SRSG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SRSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRSG's competition here
TBVPF vs FPWM Comparison May 2026
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8B. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.32, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.67, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to FPWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check FPWM's competition here