Thai Beverage Public Company Limited
Thai Beverage Public Company Limited (TBVPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TBVPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBVPF | $0.34 | -4.76% | 8.5B | 8.50 | $0.04 | +5.43% |
| DGEAF | $24.40 | -7.43% | 54.9B | 15.34 | $1.61 | +4.21% |
| PDRDF | $103.31 | -4.77% | 27.7B | 21.43 | $5.13 | +4.67% |
| PRNDY | $20.73 | -3.83% | 26.1B | 20.34 | $1.02 | +4.33% |
| TBVPY | $36.94 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 10.49 | $3.52 | +4.99% |
| DVCMY | $7.63 | +5.12% | 8.6B | 44.75 | $0.16 | +1.15% |
| DVDCF | $7.50 | +0.67% | 8.5B | 44.13 | $0.16 | +1.05% |
| EDVGF | $2.71 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 15.94 | $0.17 | +4.88% |
| BCCLF | $1.23 | -12.14% | 4.6B | 21.33 | $0.06 | +2.91% |
| TSRYF | $5.00 | -0.20% | 4.1B | 45.45 | $0.11 | +4.81% |
Stock Comparison
TBVPF vs DGEAF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DGEAF trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DGEAF's competition here
TBVPF vs PDRDF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while PDRDF trades at $103.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and PDRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDRDF's competition here
TBVPF vs PRNDY Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while PRNDY trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check PRNDY's competition here
TBVPF vs TBVPY Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TBVPY trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check TBVPY's competition here
TBVPF vs DVCMY Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DVCMY trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DVCMY's competition here
TBVPF vs DVDCF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DVDCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and DVDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVDCF's competition here
TBVPF vs EDVGF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while EDVGF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and EDVGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDVGF's competition here
TBVPF vs BCCLF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while BCCLF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and BCCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCCLF's competition here
TBVPF vs TSRYF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TSRYF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and TSRYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSRYF's competition here
TBVPF vs TSRYY Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TSRYY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check TSRYY's competition here
TBVPF vs REMYF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while REMYF trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and REMYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REMYF's competition here
TBVPF vs REMYY Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while REMYY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check REMYY's competition here
TBVPF vs DSTZF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and DSTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSTZF's competition here
TBVPF vs LPRRF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and LPRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPRRF's competition here
TBVPF vs GBSMF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and GBSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBSMF's competition here
TBVPF vs CRBBF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CRBBF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and CRBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRBBF's competition here
TBVPF vs CBYDF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 293.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CBYDF trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and CBYDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBYDF's competition here
TBVPF vs BVDRF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and BVDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BVDRF's competition here
TBVPF vs ADWPF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while ADWPF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and ADWPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADWPF's competition here
TBVPF vs SBES Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SBES have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBES's competition here
TBVPF vs CWGL Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CWGL trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check CWGL's competition here
TBVPF vs MJWNY Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while MJWNY trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check MJWNY's competition here
TBVPF vs NWINF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while NWINF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and NWINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NWINF's competition here
TBVPF vs LRKKF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check LRKKF's competition here
TBVPF vs AUVGF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while AUVGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check AUVGF's competition here
TBVPF vs CATWF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and CATWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CATWF's competition here
TBVPF vs VDKB Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while VDKB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and VDKB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDKB's competition here
TBVPF vs DWWEF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DWWEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and DWWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWWEF's competition here
TBVPF vs SLLFF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check SLLFF's competition here
TBVPF vs TNYBF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +16.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check TNYBF's competition here
TBVPF vs SVIN Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SVIN trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check SVIN's competition here
TBVPF vs THST Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and THST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THST's competition here
TBVPF vs RSAU Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while RSAU trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -28.49. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check RSAU's competition here
TBVPF vs IFBC Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, IFBC has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while IFBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas IFBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFBC's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to IFBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check IFBC's competition here
TBVPF vs EWRC Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check EWRC's competition here
TBVPF vs ASCC Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while ASCC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check ASCC's competition here
TBVPF vs SRSG Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 449.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SRSG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SRSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRSG's competition here
TBVPF vs SHNJF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 324K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and SHNJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHNJF's competition here
TBVPF vs DKAM Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 278.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DKAM's competition here
TBVPF vs MLMN Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 208.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and MLMN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLMN's competition here
TBVPF vs SBDCF Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check SBDCF's competition here
TBVPF vs TGRR Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check TGRR's competition here
TBVPF vs ICNB Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 54K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check ICNB's competition here
TBVPF vs DKTS Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 42.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKTS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.Check DKTS's competition here
TBVPF vs FPWM Comparison August 2025
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.5B. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.50, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF and FPWM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPWM's competition here