Thai Beverage Public Company Limited
Thai Beverage Public Company Limited TBVPF Peers
See (TBVPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBVPF | $0.34 | +4.07% | 8.6B | 11.43 | $0.03 | +5.37% |
| DGEAF | $28.07 | -0.01% | 62.4B | 17.43 | $1.61 | +3.77% |
| PRNDY | $20.77 | -1.30% | 26.1B | 20.98 | $0.99 | +4.89% |
| PDRDF | $103.25 | -2.96% | 26B | 20.90 | $4.94 | +5.50% |
| DVDCF | $6.50 | N/A | 7.8B | 40.63 | $0.16 | +1.14% |
| DVCMY | $6.40 | -0.47% | 7.7B | 40.00 | $0.16 | +1.16% |
| EDVGF | $2.80 | -1.41% | 5B | 16.47 | $0.17 | +5.53% |
| BCCLF | $1.25 | -0.01% | 4.5B | 20.77 | $0.06 | +0.09% |
| TSRYY | $5.25 | -1.69% | 4.3B | 47.73 | $0.11 | +4.41% |
| TSRYF | $4.90 | N/A | 4B | 44.55 | $0.11 | +4.91% |
Stock Comparison
TBVPF vs DGEAF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DGEAF trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs PRNDY Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while PRNDY trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs PDRDF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while PDRDF trades at $103.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs DVDCF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DVDCF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs DVCMY Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DVCMY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs EDVGF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while EDVGF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to EDVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs BCCLF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while BCCLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs TSRYY Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TSRYY trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 47.73. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs TSRYF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TSRYF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 44.55. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to TSRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs REMYY Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while REMYY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs REMYF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while REMYF trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to REMYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs DSTZF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to DSTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs LPRRF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to LPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs GBSMF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to GBSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs BVDRF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to BVDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs CRBBF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CRBBF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs CBYDF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CBYDF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to CBYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs ADWPF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while ADWPF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to ADWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs CWGL Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CWGL trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 286.50. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs TBVPY Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TBVPY trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs AUVGF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while AUVGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs NWINF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while NWINF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to NWINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs MJWNY Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while MJWNY trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs LRKKF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs CATWF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to CATWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs VDKB Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while VDKB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to VDKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs DWWEF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DWWEF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs SLLFF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs TNYBF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs SVIN Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SVIN trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs THST Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to THST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs RSAU Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while RSAU trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -31.99. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs IFBC Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IFBC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while IFBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas IFBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFBC's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to IFBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs ASCC Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while ASCC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs EWRC Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs SRSG Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 562.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SRSG trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs SBDCF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 466.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs SHNJF Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 324K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to SHNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs SBES Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 289.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to SBES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs DKAM Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 278.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs MLMN Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 208.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to MLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs TGRR Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs DKTS Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 42.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DKTS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs ICNB Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.
TBVPF vs FPWM Comparison
TBVPF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TBVPF stands at 8.6B. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74. Regarding current trading prices, TBVPF is priced at $0.34, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TBVPF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TBVPF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TBVPF is more volatile compared to FPWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TBVPF.