Tai Ping Carpets International Limited
Tai Ping Carpets International Limited (TAPCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TAPCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAPCF | $0.20 | +0.00% | 42.4M | 25.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| HNNMY | $2.64 | -2.94% | 105.3B | 20.52 | $0.13 | +4.82% |
| HMRZF | $14.40 | +0.00% | 23.1B | 22.15 | $0.65 | +4.52% |
| MONRF | $55.04 | +0.00% | 14.9B | 21.01 | $2.62 | +2.66% |
| MONRY | $53.69 | -1.16% | 14.8B | 20.41 | $2.62 | +2.71% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
| SHZHY | $7.14 | -1.92% | 10.8B | 12.34 | $0.58 | +4.54% |
| TRYIY | $13.68 | -1.67% | 10.7B | 20.73 | $0.66 | +0.98% |
| TRYIF | $6.63 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 20.09 | $0.33 | +1.84% |
| LPPSY | $20.41 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 18.39 | $1.11 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
TAPCF vs HNNMY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while HNNMY trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check HNNMY's competition here
TAPCF vs HMRZF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while HMRZF trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check HMRZF's competition here
TAPCF vs MONRF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while MONRF trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check MONRF's competition here
TAPCF vs MONRY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while MONRY trades at $53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check MONRY's competition here
TAPCF vs SZHIF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and SZHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZHIF's competition here
TAPCF vs SHZHY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SHZHY trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check SHZHY's competition here
TAPCF vs TRYIY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TRYIY trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check TRYIY's competition here
TAPCF vs TRYIF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TRYIF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check TRYIF's competition here
TAPCF vs LPPSY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while LPPSY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and LPPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LPPSY's competition here
TAPCF vs BSDGY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while BSDGY trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check BSDGY's competition here
TAPCF vs BSDGF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while BSDGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check BSDGF's competition here
TAPCF vs RYPPF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check RYPPF's competition here
TAPCF vs BOSSY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while BOSSY trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check BOSSY's competition here
TAPCF vs CGGGF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CGGGF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check CGGGF's competition here
TAPCF vs WACLY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while WACLY trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check WACLY's competition here
TAPCF vs DELTF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while DELTF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and DELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELTF's competition here
TAPCF vs JNBYF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while JNBYF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and JNBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JNBYF's competition here
TAPCF vs SERNF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check SERNF's competition here
TAPCF vs WACLF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and WACLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WACLF's competition here
TAPCF vs TSIHF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TSIHF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and TSIHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSIHF's competition here
TAPCF vs MKKOF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check MKKOF's competition here
TAPCF vs JWTXF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and JWTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JWTXF's competition here
TAPCF vs VDEVF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and VDEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDEVF's competition here
TAPCF vs CDGXY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 328.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CDGXY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check CDGXY's competition here
TAPCF vs CDGXF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CDGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check CDGXF's competition here
TAPCF vs WQTEF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check WQTEF's competition here
TAPCF vs ECNLF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while ECNLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and ECNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ECNLF's competition here
TAPCF vs CHRLF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and CHRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHRLF's competition here
TAPCF vs TFRFF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and TFRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFRFF's competition here
TAPCF vs NLLGF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and NLLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NLLGF's competition here
TAPCF vs IFABF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while IFABF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check IFABF's competition here
TAPCF vs USYNF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and USYNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USYNF's competition here
TAPCF vs TUGHF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check TUGHF's competition here
TAPCF vs SEPGY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and SEPGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEPGY's competition here
TAPCF vs SEPGF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check SEPGF's competition here
TAPCF vs AVLP Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and AVLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVLP's competition here
TAPCF vs TALN Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TALN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and TALN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TALN's competition here
TAPCF vs AHRO Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check AHRO's competition here
TAPCF vs JLMC Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and JLMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JLMC's competition here
TAPCF vs CGAC Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check CGAC's competition here
TAPCF vs PBBSF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and PBBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBBSF's competition here
TAPCF vs SKFG Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 477.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and SKFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKFG's competition here
TAPCF vs BLFR Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 176.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while BLFR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check BLFR's competition here
TAPCF vs CRTL Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 143.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CRTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check CRTL's competition here
TAPCF vs SUUB Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check SUUB's competition here
TAPCF vs AGNY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and AGNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGNY's competition here
TAPCF vs CIND Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, CIND has a market cap of 57.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while CIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas CIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to CIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check CIND's competition here
TAPCF vs OMVE Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to OMVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check OMVE's competition here
TAPCF vs LYJN Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check LYJN's competition here
TAPCF vs TRUA Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to TRUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check TRUA's competition here
TAPCF vs EDSFF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to EDSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check EDSFF's competition here
TAPCF vs APPM Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and APPM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APPM's competition here
TAPCF vs IBGR Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and IBGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IBGR's competition here
TAPCF vs LZENF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and LZENF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LZENF's competition here
TAPCF vs SSTU Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF is less volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAPCF.Check SSTU's competition here
TAPCF vs SUFF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and SUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUFF's competition here
TAPCF vs GLLHF Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and GLLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLLHF's competition here
TAPCF vs WLFDY Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and WLFDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WLFDY's competition here
TAPCF vs JKRO Comparison August 2025
TAPCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAPCF stands at 42.4M. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TAPCF is priced at $0.20, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAPCF currently has a P/E ratio of 25.00, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAPCF's ROE is N/A, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAPCF and JKRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JKRO's competition here