Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited TAK Peers
See (TAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAK | $15.14 | +1.10% | 47.4B | 65.52 | $0.23 | +3.91% |
| ZTS | $156.67 | -0.36% | 69.4B | 28.02 | $5.56 | +1.20% |
| HLN | $10.43 | -0.67% | 46.9B | 24.24 | $0.43 | +1.12% |
| TEVA | $16.86 | -0.85% | 19B | -14.42 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ITCI | $131.87 | +0.00% | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| RDY | $15.09 | -2.68% | 12.8B | 19.65 | $0.78 | +0.62% |
| NBIX | $127.11 | -0.52% | 12.5B | 42.96 | $2.95 | N/A |
| CTLT | $63.48 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| VTRS | $9.11 | +2.47% | 10.7B | -2.87 | -$3.18 | +5.29% |
| RGC | $17.70 | -18.55% | 10B | -2019.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TAK vs ZTS Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ZTS trades at $156.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs HLN Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while HLN trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TEVA Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TEVA trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ITCI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to ITCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs RDY Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while RDY trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs NBIX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while NBIX trades at $127.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs CTLT Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs VTRS Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while VTRS trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs RGC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while RGC trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -2019.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ELAN Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ELAN trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs LNTH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while LNTH trades at $80.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs AMRX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while AMRX trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is -203.25. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs PRGO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while PRGO trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -22.14. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ALVO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ALVO trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALVO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ALVOW Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ALVOW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs HCM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while HCM trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 76.70. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs BHC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while BHC trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -53.42. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs BGM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while BGM trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs DCPH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs EMBCV Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SUPN Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SUPN trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs INDV Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while INDV trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is -273.80. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TARO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs EVO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while EVO trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ANIP Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ANIP trades at $65.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is -55.77. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANIP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs DVAX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while DVAX trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs HROW Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while HROW trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -51.39. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs PCRX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while PCRX trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs AMPH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while AMPH trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs PAHC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while PAHC trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs COLL Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 960.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while COLL trades at $30.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs PETQ Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs AVDL Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 900.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while AVDL trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs CRON Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 736.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while CRON trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRON's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs EOLS Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 600.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while EOLS trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EOLS's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs BDSI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs EMBC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 541.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while EMBC trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SIGA Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SIGA trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ORGO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ORGO trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -22.56. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs KMDA Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 452M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while KMDA trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TLRY Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TLRY trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs EBS Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 371.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while EBS trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ZYBT Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 334.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ZYBT trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs AQST Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 322.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while AQST trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SNDL Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 321.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SNDL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs LFCR Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while LFCR trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ALIM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TKNO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TKNO trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs LNDC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNDC's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs CGC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while CGC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ACB Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 233.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ACB trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TYHT Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ESPR Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ESPR trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs OGI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while OGI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs REPH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs DERM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while DERM trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs BIOA Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, BIOA has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while BIOA trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas BIOA's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIOA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BIOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs IRWD Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while IRWD trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRWD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs CRDL Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 121.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while CRDL trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SCTL Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs PROC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs THTX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while THTX trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -33.57. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs OPTN Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to OPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ZOM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs GRVI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs INCR Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while INCR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ZYNE Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SSIC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ASRT Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ASRT trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs VLNS Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs QNTM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while QNTM trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs JUPW Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -9.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SXTC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SXTC has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SXTC trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SXTC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SXTC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SXTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs CPIX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while CPIX trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs QLI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to QLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs EGRX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while EGRX trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs KALA Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, KALA has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while KALA trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas KALA's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KALA's ROE of -3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to KALA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs HEXO Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SCYX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SCYX trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs RMTI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while RMTI trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -80.90. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs CYTH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYTH's ROE of +7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to CYTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs IXHL Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while IXHL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs DRRX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while DRRX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRRX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs GELS Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while GELS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ACRX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs PRPH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, PRPH has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while PRPH trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas PRPH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRPH's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs FLGC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while FLGC trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TXMD Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TXMD trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs AYTU Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while AYTU trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AYTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs COSM Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while COSM trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs AGRX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs TLPH Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while TLPH trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs IMCC Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, IMCC has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while IMCC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas IMCC's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to IMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs SBFMW Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, SBFMW has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while SBFMW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas SBFMW's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBFMW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to SBFMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs NLTX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs YCBD Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while YCBD trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs LCI Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs BGXX Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, BGXX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while BGXX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas BGXX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BGXX's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BGXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.
TAK vs ADMP Comparison
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 47.4B. In comparison, ADMP has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $15.14, while ADMP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 65.52, whereas ADMP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADMP's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ADMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.