The Swatch Group AG
The Swatch Group AG (SWGAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWGAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWGAF | $285.55 | +16.40% | 14.9B | 4760.17 | $0.06 | +1.90% |
| LVMUY | $111.89 | +0.76% | 277.1B | 21.80 | $5.12 | +2.71% |
| LVMHF | $551.00 | -0.82% | 276.5B | 21.84 | $25.60 | +2.72% |
| HESAY | $196.45 | -0.62% | 205.9B | 38.91 | $5.05 | +1.08% |
| HESAF | $1,968.85 | -1.13% | 204.5B | 38.61 | $50.52 | +2.39% |
| CFRUY | $20.42 | +1.79% | 120.1B | 26.89 | $0.76 | +1.85% |
| CFRHF | $206.18 | +5.50% | 106.9B | 26.30 | $7.61 | +1.89% |
| CHDRY | $131.37 | +1.46% | 94.8B | 17.87 | $7.35 | +3.18% |
| CHDRF | $502.45 | +0.00% | 90.6B | 17.10 | $29.39 | +3.32% |
| PPRUY | $28.99 | +1.76% | 35.5B | -966.33 | -$0.03 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
SWGAF vs LVMUY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 277.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while LVMUY trades at $111.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check LVMUY's competition here
SWGAF vs LVMHF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 276.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while LVMHF trades at $551.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check LVMHF's competition here
SWGAF vs HESAY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while HESAY trades at $196.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check HESAY's competition here
SWGAF vs HESAF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 204.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while HESAF trades at $1,968.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check HESAF's competition here
SWGAF vs CFRUY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 120.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CFRUY trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CFRUY's competition here
SWGAF vs CFRHF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CFRHF trades at $206.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CFRHF's competition here
SWGAF vs CHDRY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CHDRY trades at $131.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CHDRY's competition here
SWGAF vs CHDRF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CHDRF trades at $502.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CHDRF's competition here
SWGAF vs PPRUY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while PPRUY trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is -966.33. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check PPRUY's competition here
SWGAF vs PPRUF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while PPRUF trades at $288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is -1066.67. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check PPRUF's competition here
SWGAF vs CJEWF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CJEWF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CJEWF's competition here
SWGAF vs SWGAY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while SWGAY trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 195.11. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check SWGAY's competition here
SWGAF vs CJEWY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CJEWY trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CJEWY's competition here
SWGAF vs PRDSY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while PRDSY trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check PRDSY's competition here
SWGAF vs PRDSF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while PRDSF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check PRDSF's competition here
SWGAF vs SWGNF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while SWGNF trades at $45.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 4563.00. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check SWGNF's competition here
SWGAF vs BCUCY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while BCUCY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check BCUCY's competition here
SWGAF vs BURBY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while BURBY trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is -166.30. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BURBY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check BURBY's competition here
SWGAF vs BBRYF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while BBRYF trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is -164.90. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check BBRYF's competition here
SWGAF vs PNDZF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while PNDZF trades at $71.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check PNDZF's competition here
SWGAF vs PANDY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check PANDY's competition here
SWGAF vs WOSGF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while WOSGF trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check WOSGF's competition here
SWGAF vs LKFLF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while LKFLF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check LKFLF's competition here
SWGAF vs SFRGY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while SFRGY trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check SFRGY's competition here
SWGAF vs SFRGF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while SFRGF trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check SFRGF's competition here
SWGAF vs CHOWF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CHOWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CHOWF's competition here
SWGAF vs TSSJF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while TSSJF trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check TSSJF's competition here
SWGAF vs EPRJF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while EPRJF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check EPRJF's competition here
SWGAF vs DCOHF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while DCOHF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check DCOHF's competition here
SWGAF vs ZAPNF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check ZAPNF's competition here
SWGAF vs ORWHF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while ORWHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check ORWHF's competition here
SWGAF vs FLLIY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check FLLIY's competition here
SWGAF vs HENGF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check HENGF's competition here
SWGAF vs CTTLF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CTTLF's competition here
SWGAF vs HENGY Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while HENGY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check HENGY's competition here
SWGAF vs CEBTF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while CEBTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check CEBTF's competition here
SWGAF vs MENEF Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while MENEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MENEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check MENEF's competition here
SWGAF vs MDNL Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check MDNL's competition here
SWGAF vs MAJJ Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check MAJJ's competition here
SWGAF vs BANI Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check BANI's competition here
SWGAF vs EATR Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is less volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check EATR's competition here
SWGAF vs BRGO Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check BRGO's competition here
SWGAF vs MASN Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 122.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MASN's ROE of +11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is less volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check MASN's competition here
SWGAF vs SSOK Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 98.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while SSOK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check SSOK's competition here
SWGAF vs BRGOD Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check BRGOD's competition here
SWGAF vs AVEW Comparison May 2026
SWGAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGAF stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGAF is priced at $285.55, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGAF currently has a P/E ratio of 4760.17, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGAF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGAF is more volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGAF.Check AVEW's competition here