Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ)
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) SVCBF Peers
See (SVCBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVCBF | $13.13 | -1.61% | 9.2B | 23.87 | $0.55 | +2.28% |
| KLBAY | $6.99 | -4.12% | 22.4B | 66.91 | $0.11 | +5.62% |
| UPMMY | $28.66 | +5.10% | 15.1B | 42.82 | $0.67 | +6.06% |
| UPMKF | $26.69 | -4.10% | 14.1B | 40.44 | $0.66 | +6.07% |
| SCABY | $14.30 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 26.00 | $0.55 | +2.06% |
| SEOAY | $11.32 | +5.06% | 9B | -75.20 | -$0.15 | +2.15% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.2B | 9.70 | $1.91 | N/A |
| MONDY | $33.90 | +1.19% | 7.5B | 29.72 | $1.13 | +4.95% |
| SEOJF | $8.56 | +0.00% | 6.8B | -57.07 | -$0.15 | +3.02% |
| HLMNY | $21.25 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 25.91 | $0.82 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
SVCBF vs KLBAY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while KLBAY trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs UPMMY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while UPMMY trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs UPMKF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while UPMKF trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and UPMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs SCABY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SCABY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs SEOAY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SEOAY trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -75.20. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs MONDF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and MONDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs MONDY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while MONDY trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs SEOJF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs HLMNY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while HLMNY trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs OJIPF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while OJIPF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to OJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs OJIPY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while OJIPY trades at $48.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs STLJF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while STLJF trades at $57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs BLRDF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while BLRDF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs POELF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while POELF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs NDGPY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while NDGPY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to NDGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs PIKQF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while PIKQF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to PIKQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs NDGPF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while NDGPF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs CFPZF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while CFPZF trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs LMPMF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs SPPJY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SPPJY trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs LMPMY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while LMPMY trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and LMPMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs NIJPF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs TKFTF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs IFSPF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 498.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while IFSPF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs PKNOF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs ACAZF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 234.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while ACAZF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs ACSYF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while ACSYF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs RTTNY Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and RTTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs RTERF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs WFSTF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while WFSTF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to WFSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs GFELF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while GFELF trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to GFELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs ICLTF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while ICLTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to ICLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs KEWL Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while KEWL trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and KEWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs RUBNF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while RUBNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs CFPUF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while CFPUF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and CFPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs BRGSF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs TCOR Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while TCOR trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to TCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs SUPBF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs CFXTF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while CFXTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to CFXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs WBNEF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs SGTM Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SGTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs BMSPF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs HMTC Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while HMTC trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs BSTO Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while BSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and BSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs SGMD Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs EXRG Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXRG's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs ZMGD Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVCBF.
SVCBF vs BPMI Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs KPCM Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KPCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and KPCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs HAIPF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HAIPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and HAIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SVCBF vs VRDSF Comparison
SVCBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVCBF stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VRDSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVCBF is priced at $13.13, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVCBF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.87, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVCBF's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVCBF and VRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).