Holmen AB (publ)
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HLMNY
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HLMNY
Holmen AB (publ) (HLMNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLMNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLMNY | $16.85 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 16.68 | $1.01 | +3.02% |
| KLBAY | $7.46 | -1.58% | 22.9B | 82.89 | $0.09 | +4.80% |
| UPMMY | $30.92 | -0.55% | 16.4B | 29.15 | $1.07 | +5.62% |
| UPMKF | $30.48 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 28.22 | $1.08 | +5.74% |
| SEOJF | $13.64 | +23.13% | 10.8B | 13.12 | $1.04 | +1.12% |
| SEOAY | $12.11 | -1.53% | 9.8B | 11.90 | $1.04 | +1.24% |
| SCABY | $12.90 | +6.35% | 9.1B | 25.80 | $0.50 | +2.57% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.2B | 9.70 | $1.91 | +4.26% |
| SVCBF | $11.35 | -3.57% | 8B | 22.70 | $0.50 | +2.99% |
| OJIPF | $5.80 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 26.36 | $0.22 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
HLMNY vs KLBAY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while KLBAY trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 82.89. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check KLBAY's competition here
HLMNY vs UPMMY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while UPMMY trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check UPMMY's competition here
HLMNY vs UPMKF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while UPMKF trades at $30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and UPMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPMKF's competition here
HLMNY vs SEOJF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SEOJF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check SEOJF's competition here
HLMNY vs SEOAY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SEOAY trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check SEOAY's competition here
HLMNY vs SCABY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SCABY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SCABY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCABY's competition here
HLMNY vs MONDF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and MONDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MONDF's competition here
HLMNY vs SVCBF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SVCBF trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check SVCBF's competition here
HLMNY vs OJIPF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while OJIPF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and OJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OJIPF's competition here
HLMNY vs MONDY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while MONDY trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check MONDY's competition here
HLMNY vs OJIPY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while OJIPY trades at $55.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check OJIPY's competition here
HLMNY vs NDGPF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while NDGPF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and NDGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDGPF's competition here
HLMNY vs NDGPY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while NDGPY trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to NDGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check NDGPY's competition here
HLMNY vs RTTNY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and RTTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTTNY's competition here
HLMNY vs STLJF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while STLJF trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check STLJF's competition here
HLMNY vs POELF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while POELF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and POELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POELF's competition here
HLMNY vs BLRDF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while BLRDF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BLRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLRDF's competition here
HLMNY vs PIKQF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while PIKQF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to PIKQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check PIKQF's competition here
HLMNY vs LMPMF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while LMPMF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LMPMF's competition here
HLMNY vs LMPMY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while LMPMY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and LMPMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LMPMY's competition here
HLMNY vs CFPZF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while CFPZF trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check CFPZF's competition here
HLMNY vs NIJPF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 820.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while NIJPF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and NIJPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIJPF's competition here
HLMNY vs SPPJY Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 704.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SPPJY trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SPPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPPJY's competition here
HLMNY vs TKFTF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKFTF's competition here
HLMNY vs IFSPF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while IFSPF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check IFSPF's competition here
HLMNY vs ACAZF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while ACAZF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and ACAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACAZF's competition here
HLMNY vs ACSYF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while ACSYF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and ACSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACSYF's competition here
HLMNY vs RTERF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTERF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTERF's competition here
HLMNY vs WFSTF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while WFSTF trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to WFSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check WFSTF's competition here
HLMNY vs GFELF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while GFELF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to GFELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check GFELF's competition here
HLMNY vs KEWL Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while KEWL trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and KEWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KEWL's competition here
HLMNY vs ICLTF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while ICLTF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to ICLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check ICLTF's competition here
HLMNY vs SGTM Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SGTM trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check SGTM's competition here
HLMNY vs RUBNF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while RUBNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and RUBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUBNF's competition here
HLMNY vs CFPUF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while CFPUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to CFPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check CFPUF's competition here
HLMNY vs BRGSF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGSF's competition here
HLMNY vs TCOR Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while TCOR trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and TCOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCOR's competition here
HLMNY vs SUPBF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUPBF's competition here
HLMNY vs WBNEF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while WBNEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check WBNEF's competition here
HLMNY vs BSTO Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while BSTO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSTO's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to BSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check BSTO's competition here
HLMNY vs PKNOF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while PKNOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKNOF's competition here
HLMNY vs CFXTF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while CFXTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to CFXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check CFXTF's competition here
HLMNY vs HMTC Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while HMTC trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTC's competition here
HLMNY vs BMSPF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BMSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMSPF's competition here
HLMNY vs PTBTQ Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PTBTQ has a market cap of 24.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while PTBTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas PTBTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTBTQ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to PTBTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check PTBTQ's competition here
HLMNY vs SGMD Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGMD's competition here
HLMNY vs EXRG Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXRG's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check EXRG's competition here
HLMNY vs ZMGD Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMNY.Check ZMGD's competition here
HLMNY vs BPMI Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPMI's competition here
HLMNY vs HAIPF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HAIPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and HAIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIPF's competition here
HLMNY vs VRDSF Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VRDSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and VRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VRDSF's competition here
HLMNY vs KPCM Comparison April 2026
HLMNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMNY stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KPCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLMNY is priced at $16.85, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMNY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.68, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMNY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLMNY and KPCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPCM's competition here