Supremex Inc.
Supremex Inc. (SUMXF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUMXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMXF | $2.67 | +1.52% | 65.1M | 7.42 | $0.36 | +18.96% |
| DSSMY | $30.00 | +14.90% | 41.5B | 37.04 | $0.81 | N/A |
| NPKLY | $21.00 | +84.21% | 34.7B | -2100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| INPAP | $81.00 | +0.00% | 27B | N/A | N/A | +4.94% |
| SMFTF | $49.11 | N/A | 25.5B | 15.54 | $3.16 | +3.55% |
| SMFKY | $45.96 | -0.13% | 24.8B | 14.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| AMCCF | $42.75 | +3.80% | 19.8B | 34.20 | $1.25 | +4.83% |
| CCLLF | $63.09 | +0.00% | 11B | 18.95 | $3.33 | +1.51% |
| CCDBF | $62.41 | +1.79% | 10.8B | 18.60 | $3.36 | +1.54% |
| DITHF | $7.22 | -3.86% | 10B | 36.10 | $0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SUMXF vs DSSMY Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check DSSMY's competition here
SUMXF vs NPKLY Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check NPKLY's competition here
SUMXF vs INPAP Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while INPAP trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INPAP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check INPAP's competition here
SUMXF vs SMFTF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to SMFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SMFTF's competition here
SUMXF vs SMFKY Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SMFKY's competition here
SUMXF vs AMCCF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while AMCCF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to AMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check AMCCF's competition here
SUMXF vs CCLLF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while CCLLF trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check CCLLF's competition here
SUMXF vs CCDBF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while CCDBF trades at $62.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check CCDBF's competition here
SUMXF vs DITHF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while DITHF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check DITHF's competition here
SUMXF vs SIGCY Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SIGCY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is -62.41. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SIGCY's competition here
SUMXF vs SCBGF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SCBGF trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to SCBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SCBGF's competition here
SUMXF vs VDRFF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while VDRFF trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to VDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check VDRFF's competition here
SUMXF vs HOYFF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while HOYFF trades at $34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to HOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check HOYFF's competition here
SUMXF vs SINC Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SINC trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SINC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to SINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SINC's competition here
SUMXF vs PCTGY Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to PCTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check PCTGY's competition here
SUMXF vs ORRYY Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while ORRYY trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check ORRYY's competition here
SUMXF vs MNHFF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while MNHFF trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check MNHFF's competition here
SUMXF vs WIPKF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while WIPKF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check WIPKF's competition here
SUMXF vs ORRAF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while ORRAF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to ORRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check ORRAF's competition here
SUMXF vs ELPKF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while ELPKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check ELPKF's competition here
SUMXF vs CADNF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 784.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while CADNF trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to CADNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check CADNF's competition here
SUMXF vs FUJSF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 753.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while FUJSF trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check FUJSF's competition here
SUMXF vs GRVWF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to GRVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check GRVWF's competition here
SUMXF vs JSPCF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while JSPCF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to JSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check JSPCF's competition here
SUMXF vs FRFTF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 379.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while FRFTF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check FRFTF's competition here
SUMXF vs HXGCF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 201.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while HXGCF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check HXGCF's competition here
SUMXF vs SNGSF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 190.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SNGSF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to SNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SNGSF's competition here
SUMXF vs IFLXF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while IFLXF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to IFLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check IFLXF's competition here
SUMXF vs VKSC Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while VKSC trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -73.81. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to VKSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check VKSC's competition here
SUMXF vs YIKWF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to YIKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check YIKWF's competition here
SUMXF vs SPQDF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check SPQDF's competition here
SUMXF vs NEXNF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while NEXNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check NEXNF's competition here
SUMXF vs IDND Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while IDND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check IDND's competition here
SUMXF vs MAYX Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while MAYX trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to MAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check MAYX's competition here
SUMXF vs RDVA Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while RDVA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check RDVA's competition here
SUMXF vs GDNPF Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 976K. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to GDNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check GDNPF's competition here
SUMXF vs EPTI Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while EPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check EPTI's competition here
SUMXF vs TZPC Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 86.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while TZPC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check TZPC's competition here
SUMXF vs ACGX Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 17.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while ACGX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to ACGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check ACGX's competition here
SUMXF vs ACTX Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while ACTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACTX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to ACTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check ACTX's competition here
SUMXF vs PGOG Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while PGOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGOG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is less volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check PGOG's competition here
SUMXF vs GPRC Comparison May 2026
SUMXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUMXF stands at 65.1M. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, SUMXF is priced at $2.67, while GPRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUMXF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.42, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUMXF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUMXF is more volatile compared to GPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUMXF.Check GPRC's competition here