Constellation Brands, Inc.
Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ Peers
See (STZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
STZ vs DGEAF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DGEAF has a market cap of 65.74B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DGEAF trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DGEAF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DGEAF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to DGEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DEO Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DEO has a market cap of 62.87B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DEO trades at $113.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DEO's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DEO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to DEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs PRNDY Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, PRNDY has a market cap of 27.54B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while PRNDY trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas PRNDY's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to PRNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs PDRDF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, PDRDF has a market cap of 27.04B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while PDRDF trades at $107.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas PDRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PDRDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to PDRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs BF-A Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, BF-A has a market cap of 16.26B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while BF-A trades at $34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas BF-A's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BF-A's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to BF-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs BF-B Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, BF-B has a market cap of 16.22B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while BF-B trades at $34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas BF-B's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BF-B's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to BF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs TBVPF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TBVPF has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while TBVPF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas TBVPF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TBVPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to TBVPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DVCMY Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DVCMY has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DVCMY trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DVCMY's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DVCMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to DVCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DVDCF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DVDCF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DVDCF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DVDCF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DVDCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to DVDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs EDVGF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, EDVGF has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while EDVGF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas EDVGF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EDVGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to EDVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs TSRYY Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TSRYY has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while TSRYY trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas TSRYY's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to TSRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs BCCLF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, BCCLF has a market cap of 4.31B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while BCCLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas BCCLF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BCCLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to BCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs TSRYF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TSRYF has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while TSRYF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas TSRYF's P/E ratio is 44.55. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to TSRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs REMYF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, REMYF has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while REMYF trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas REMYF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REMYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to REMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs REMYY Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, REMYY has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while REMYY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas REMYY's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REMYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to REMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DSTZF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DSTZF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DSTZF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DSTZF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to DSTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs NAPA Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NAPA has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while NAPA trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas NAPA's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NAPA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to NAPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs LPRRF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, LPRRF has a market cap of 795.30M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while LPRRF trades at $134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas LPRRF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LPRRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to LPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs MGPI Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MGPI has a market cap of 681.08M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while MGPI trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas MGPI's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MGPI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to MGPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs GBSMF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, GBSMF has a market cap of 598.35M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while GBSMF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas GBSMF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GBSMF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to GBSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs CRBBF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, CRBBF has a market cap of 301.69M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while CRBBF trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas CRBBF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRBBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to CRBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs CBYDF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, CBYDF has a market cap of 301.49M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while CBYDF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas CBYDF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CBYDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to CBYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs BVDRF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, BVDRF has a market cap of 289.75M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while BVDRF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas BVDRF's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BVDRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to BVDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs EPSM Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, EPSM has a market cap of 149.33M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while EPSM trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas EPSM's P/E ratio is 225.40. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EPSM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to EPSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs ADWPF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ADWPF has a market cap of 146.76M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while ADWPF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas ADWPF's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADWPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to ADWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs CWGL Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, CWGL has a market cap of 112.31M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while CWGL trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas CWGL's P/E ratio is 136.25. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CWGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to CWGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs AUVGF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, AUVGF has a market cap of 87.67M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while AUVGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas AUVGF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AUVGF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to AUVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs TBVPY Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TBVPY has a market cap of 82.63M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while TBVPY trades at $32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas TBVPY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TBVPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to TBVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs NWINF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, NWINF has a market cap of 72.38M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while NWINF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas NWINF's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NWINF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to NWINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs MJWNY Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MJWNY has a market cap of 68.45M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while MJWNY trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas MJWNY's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MJWNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to MJWNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs LRKKF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, LRKKF has a market cap of 57.81M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while LRKKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas LRKKF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LRKKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to LRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs WVVI Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WVVI has a market cap of 29.79M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while WVVI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas WVVI's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WVVI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to WVVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs CATWF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, CATWF has a market cap of 21.41M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while CATWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas CATWF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CATWF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to CATWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs WVVIP Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WVVIP has a market cap of 17.18M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while WVVIP trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas WVVIP's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WVVIP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to WVVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs VDKB Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VDKB has a market cap of 12.76M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while VDKB trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas VDKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VDKB's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to VDKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs BLNE Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, BLNE has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while BLNE trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas BLNE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLNE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to BLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DWWEF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DWWEF has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DWWEF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DWWEF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DWWEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to DWWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs VINE Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VINE has a market cap of 9.77M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while VINE trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas VINE's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VINE's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to VINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs SLLFF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SLLFF has a market cap of 8.78M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while SLLFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas SLLFF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLLFF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to SLLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs LQR Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, LQR has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while LQR trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas LQR's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LQR's ROE of -281517.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to LQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs AMZE Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, AMZE has a market cap of 8.15M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while AMZE trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas AMZE's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMZE's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to AMZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs TNYBF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TNYBF has a market cap of 8.10M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while TNYBF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas TNYBF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TNYBF's ROE of +3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to TNYBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs SVIN Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SVIN has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while SVIN trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas SVIN's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SVIN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to SVIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs EAST Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, EAST has a market cap of 4.16M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while EAST trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas EAST's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EAST's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to EAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs THST Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, THST has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while THST trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas THST's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to THST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs IFBC Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, IFBC has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while IFBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas IFBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IFBC's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to IFBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs RSAU Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, RSAU has a market cap of 1.86M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while RSAU trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas RSAU's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSAU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to RSAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs VWE Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VWE has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while VWE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas VWE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VWE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to VWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs ASCC Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ASCC has a market cap of 1.33M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while ASCC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas ASCC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASCC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to ASCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs EWRC Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, EWRC has a market cap of 1.10M. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while EWRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas EWRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EWRC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to EWRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs SRSG Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SRSG has a market cap of 877302.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while SRSG trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas SRSG's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRSG's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to SRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs SBES Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SBES has a market cap of 579162.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while SBES trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas SBES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to SBES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs VWEWW Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, VWEWW has a market cap of 567509.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while VWEWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas VWEWW's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VWEWW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to VWEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs SBDCF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SBDCF has a market cap of 466308.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while SBDCF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas SBDCF's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBDCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to SBDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs SHNJF Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, SHNJF has a market cap of 323978.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while SHNJF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas SHNJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHNJF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to SHNJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DKTS Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DKTS has a market cap of 213728.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DKTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DKTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DKTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to DKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs MLMN Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, MLMN has a market cap of 92627.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while MLMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas MLMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to MLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs TGRR Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, TGRR has a market cap of 86412.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while TGRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas TGRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TGRR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to TGRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs ICNB Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, ICNB has a market cap of 10794.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while ICNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas ICNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICNB's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to ICNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs DKAM Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, DKAM has a market cap of 2783.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while DKAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas DKAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DKAM's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to DKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs FPWM Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, FPWM has a market cap of 74.00. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while FPWM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas FPWM's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FPWM's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to FPWM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs STZ-B Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, STZ-B comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while STZ-B trades at $310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas STZ-B's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STZ-B's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is more volatile compared to STZ-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
STZ vs WBEV Comparison
STZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STZ stands at 33.38B. In comparison, WBEV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, STZ is priced at $187.52, while WBEV trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STZ currently has a P/E ratio of -416.71, whereas WBEV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, STZ's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WBEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STZ is less volatile compared to WBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STZ.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGEAF | $29.58 | +5.21% | 65.74B | 18.37 | $1.61 | +3.55% |
DEO | $113.16 | -0.11% | 62.87B | 17.52 | $6.46 | +3.66% |
STZ | $187.52 | +0.29% | 33.38B | -416.71 | -$0.45 | +2.16% |
PRNDY | $21.89 | -0.50% | 27.54B | 22.11 | $0.99 | +4.65% |
PDRDF | $107.45 | -0.36% | 27.04B | 21.75 | $4.94 | +5.30% |
BF-A | $34.29 | -0.09% | 16.26B | 16.41 | $2.09 | +2.59% |
BF-B | $34.39 | -0.32% | 16.22B | 16.45 | $2.09 | +2.59% |
TBVPF | $0.38 | +5.97% | 9.55B | 9.50 | $0.04 | +4.72% |
DVCMY | $6.77 | +5.78% | 8.12B | 35.63 | $0.19 | +0.59% |
DVDCF | $6.65 | +4.72% | 8.00B | 35.00 | $0.19 | +1.11% |