The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.
The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. (NAPA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAPA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAPA | $11.09 | -0.18% | 1.6B | 27.73 | $0.40 | N/A |
| DEO | $84.30 | +1.04% | 46.9B | 19.48 | $4.33 | +3.95% |
| STZ | $148.21 | -1.36% | 25.5B | 15.42 | $9.61 | +2.78% |
| BF-A | $28.36 | +0.57% | 13.3B | 16.49 | $1.72 | +3.31% |
| BF-B | $27.68 | +1.10% | 13B | 16.09 | $1.72 | +3.31% |
| RYZ | $27.22 | +2.99% | 1.1B | -18.41 | -$1.48 | +2.71% |
| MGPI | $19.70 | +3.20% | 421M | -1.77 | -$11.15 | +2.43% |
| AGCC | $18.39 | -1.13% | 419M | 459.75 | $0.04 | N/A |
| BLNE | $1.92 | -0.52% | 17.4M | -1.20 | -$1.60 | N/A |
| EPSM | $1.25 | -3.85% | 16.8M | -11.36 | -$0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NAPA vs DEO Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEO has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while DEO trades at $84.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas DEO's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to DEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check DEO's competition here
NAPA vs STZ Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STZ has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while STZ trades at $148.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas STZ's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to STZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check STZ's competition here
NAPA vs BF-A Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BF-A has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while BF-A trades at $28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas BF-A's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BF-A's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to BF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check BF-A's competition here
NAPA vs BF-B Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BF-B has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while BF-B trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas BF-B's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BF-B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to BF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check BF-B's competition here
NAPA vs RYZ Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RYZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while RYZ trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas RYZ's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RYZ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to RYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check RYZ's competition here
NAPA vs MGPI Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGPI has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while MGPI trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas MGPI's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGPI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to MGPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check MGPI's competition here
NAPA vs AGCC Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AGCC has a market cap of 419M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while AGCC trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas AGCC's P/E ratio is 459.75. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGCC's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to AGCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check AGCC's competition here
NAPA vs BLNE Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLNE has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while BLNE trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas BLNE's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLNE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to BLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check BLNE's competition here
NAPA vs EPSM Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EPSM has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while EPSM trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas EPSM's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EPSM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to EPSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check EPSM's competition here
NAPA vs WVVI Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WVVI has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while WVVI trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas WVVI's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WVVI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to WVVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check WVVI's competition here
NAPA vs WVVIP Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WVVIP has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while WVVIP trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas WVVIP's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WVVIP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to WVVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check WVVIP's competition here
NAPA vs VINE Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VINE has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while VINE trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas VINE's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VINE's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to VINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check VINE's competition here
NAPA vs LQR Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LQR has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while LQR trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas LQR's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LQR's ROE of -3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to LQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check LQR's competition here
NAPA vs EAST Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EAST has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while EAST trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas EAST's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EAST's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to EAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check EAST's competition here
NAPA vs VWE Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VWE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while VWE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas VWE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VWE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to VWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check VWE's competition here
NAPA vs VWEWW Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VWEWW has a market cap of 567.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while VWEWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas VWEWW's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VWEWW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to VWEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check VWEWW's competition here
NAPA vs IBG Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IBG has a market cap of 292.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while IBG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas IBG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBG's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to IBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check IBG's competition here
NAPA vs WBEV Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while WBEV trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas WBEV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to WBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check WBEV's competition here
NAPA vs STZ-B Comparison May 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STZ-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while STZ-B trades at $310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas STZ-B's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STZ-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to STZ-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check STZ-B's competition here