Standard Uranium Ltd.
Standard Uranium Ltd. STTDF Peers
See (STTDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STTDF | $0.07 | +0.00% | 4.1M | -1.22 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| NATKY | $42.70 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 6.63 | $6.44 | N/A |
| SRUUF | $18.25 | +0.00% | 5.1B | -3.87 | -$4.61 | N/A |
| PALAD | $10.41 | +0.92% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CGNMF | $0.30 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 30.00 | $0.01 | +0.17% |
| PALAF | $5.07 | +0.04% | 2B | -128.45 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| YLLXF | $7.18 | +0.05% | 1.5B | 8.80 | $0.79 | N/A |
| DYLLF | $1.15 | +0.00% | 1.1B | -113.85 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| EGRAF | $0.02 | +1975.00% | 527M | -0.13 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FCUUF | $0.50 | +0.85% | 433M | -50.42 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STTDF vs NATKY Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NATKY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while NATKY trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NATKY's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NATKY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and NATKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs SRUUF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while SRUUF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs PALAD Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while PALAD trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PALAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs CGNMF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while CGNMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and CGNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs PALAF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while PALAF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -128.45. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PALAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs YLLXF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while YLLXF trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs DYLLF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while DYLLF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is -113.85. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs EGRAF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 527M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while EGRAF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and EGRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs FCUUF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FCUUF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while FCUUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas FCUUF's P/E ratio is -50.42. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FCUUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to FCUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs BNNLF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 380.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while BNNLF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs ISENF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while ISENF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs EGRAY Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and EGRAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs BKLRF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while BKLRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and BKLRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs SASKF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while SASKF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs AUEEF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while AUEEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs ANLDF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 102.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while ANLDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs FUUFF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while FUUFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs ELVUF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while ELVUF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs MGAFF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while MGAFF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs FISOF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while FISOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and FISOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs PENMF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while PENMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and PENMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs ADRLF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while ADRLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -21.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and ADRLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs GVXXF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while GVXXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs LURAF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while LURAF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs NTELF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while NTELF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs WSTRF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while WSTRF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs KVLQF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while KVLQF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs APAAF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while APAAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to APAAF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs CKEFF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs BKUCF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +7.86%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs MMTLF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while MMTLF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs PTUUF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while PTUUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs BSENF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while BSENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs ALXEF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs SUUFF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while SUUFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs AZURF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while AZURF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.
STTDF vs SRSIF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, SRSIF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while SRSIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SRSIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SRSIF's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and SRSIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs NVTQF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while NVTQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and NVTQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs NRUNF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 598.3K. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while NRUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and NRUNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs XEPRF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 419.1K. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while XEPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and XEPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs JTCMF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21.8K. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while JTCMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and JTCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STTDF vs ENCUF Comparison
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.1M. In comparison, ENCUF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.07, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF and ENCUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).