Standard Uranium Ltd.
Standard Uranium Ltd. (STTDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STTDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STTDF | $0.06 | -0.48% | 4.8M | -1.03 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| EGRAF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 15.3B | -3.77 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NATKY | $42.57 | -1.91% | 11B | 6.92 | $6.15 | +5.78% |
| SRUUF | $16.10 | -1.41% | 4.6B | -3.51 | -$4.61 | N/A |
| PALAD | $10.41 | +0.92% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CGNMF | $0.28 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 28.00 | $0.01 | +0.46% |
| PALAF | $3.96 | -2.82% | 1.6B | -98.37 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| YLLXF | $6.56 | +1.55% | 1.4B | -3.04 | -$2.16 | N/A |
| DYLLF | $0.97 | +1.10% | 943.7M | -97.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FCUUF | $0.50 | +0.85% | 433M | -50.42 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STTDF vs EGRAF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while EGRAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to EGRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check EGRAF's competition here
STTDF vs NATKY Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NATKY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while NATKY trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NATKY's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NATKY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to NATKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check NATKY's competition here
STTDF vs SRUUF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while SRUUF trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check SRUUF's competition here
STTDF vs PALAD Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while PALAD trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PALAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check PALAD's competition here
STTDF vs CGNMF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while CGNMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to CGNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check CGNMF's competition here
STTDF vs PALAF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while PALAF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -98.37. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PALAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check PALAF's competition here
STTDF vs YLLXF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while YLLXF trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check YLLXF's competition here
STTDF vs DYLLF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 943.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while DYLLF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check DYLLF's competition here
STTDF vs FCUUF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FCUUF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while FCUUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FCUUF's P/E ratio is -50.42. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FCUUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to FCUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check FCUUF's competition here
STTDF vs BNNLF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while BNNLF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check BNNLF's competition here
STTDF vs ISENF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while ISENF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check ISENF's competition here
STTDF vs EGRAY Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to EGRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check EGRAY's competition here
STTDF vs BKLRF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while BKLRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to BKLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check BKLRF's competition here
STTDF vs SASKF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while SASKF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check SASKF's competition here
STTDF vs AUEEF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while AUEEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check AUEEF's competition here
STTDF vs FUUFF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while FUUFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check FUUFF's competition here
STTDF vs ANLDF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while ANLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check ANLDF's competition here
STTDF vs FISOF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while FISOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to FISOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check FISOF's competition here
STTDF vs MGAFF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while MGAFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check MGAFF's competition here
STTDF vs ELVUF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while ELVUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check ELVUF's competition here
STTDF vs PENMF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while PENMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PENMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check PENMF's competition here
STTDF vs ADRLF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while ADRLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -21.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ADRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check ADRLF's competition here
STTDF vs LURAF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while LURAF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check LURAF's competition here
STTDF vs GVXXF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while GVXXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check GVXXF's competition here
STTDF vs WSTRF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while WSTRF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check WSTRF's competition here
STTDF vs NTELF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while NTELF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check NTELF's competition here
STTDF vs PTUUF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while PTUUF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check PTUUF's competition here
STTDF vs APAAF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while APAAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to APAAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check APAAF's competition here
STTDF vs MMTLF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while MMTLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check MMTLF's competition here
STTDF vs CKEFF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check CKEFF's competition here
STTDF vs BKUCF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +5.45%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check BKUCF's competition here
STTDF vs KVLQF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while KVLQF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check KVLQF's competition here
STTDF vs BSENF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while BSENF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check BSENF's competition here
STTDF vs AZURF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while AZURF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check AZURF's competition here
STTDF vs ALXEF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check ALXEF's competition here
STTDF vs SUUFF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while SUUFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check SUUFF's competition here
STTDF vs SRSIF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SRSIF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while SRSIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SRSIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SRSIF's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to SRSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check SRSIF's competition here
STTDF vs NVTQF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while NVTQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to NVTQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check NVTQF's competition here
STTDF vs NRUNF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 596.3K. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while NRUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to NRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check NRUNF's competition here
STTDF vs XEPRF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 419.1K. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while XEPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to XEPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check XEPRF's competition here
STTDF vs JTCMF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21.8K. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while JTCMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is less volatile compared to JTCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check JTCMF's competition here
STTDF vs ENCUF Comparison July 2025
STTDF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STTDF stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ENCUF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STTDF is priced at $0.06, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STTDF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STTDF's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STTDF is more volatile compared to ENCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STTDF.Check ENCUF's competition here