JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom
JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NATKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATKY | $68.70 | -1.86% | 17.8B | 14.19 | $4.84 | +3.41% |
| SRUUF | $19.48 | -1.17% | 5.5B | -10.77 | -$1.81 | N/A |
| EGRAF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 3.8B | -0.94 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PALAF | $7.45 | -1.32% | 3.3B | -67.57 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| PALAD | $10.41 | +0.92% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EGRAY | $0.01 | +0.00% | 3B | -0.75 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CGNMF | $0.40 | +0.25% | 3B | 40.00 | $0.01 | +0.33% |
| YLLXF | $7.63 | +0.71% | 1.9B | -190.75 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| DYLLF | $1.13 | -3.42% | 1.1B | 113.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| BNNLF | $2.50 | -1.42% | 518.3M | -249.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NATKY vs SRUUF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while SRUUF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check SRUUF's competition here
NATKY vs EGRAF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while EGRAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to EGRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check EGRAF's competition here
NATKY vs PALAF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while PALAF trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -67.57. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PALAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check PALAF's competition here
NATKY vs PALAD Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while PALAD trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PALAD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check PALAD's competition here
NATKY vs EGRAY Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to EGRAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check EGRAY's competition here
NATKY vs CGNMF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while CGNMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to CGNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check CGNMF's competition here
NATKY vs YLLXF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while YLLXF trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is -190.75. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check YLLXF's competition here
NATKY vs DYLLF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while DYLLF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is 113.00. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check DYLLF's competition here
NATKY vs BNNLF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while BNNLF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -249.50. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check BNNLF's competition here
NATKY vs FCUUF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, FCUUF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while FCUUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas FCUUF's P/E ratio is -50.42. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FCUUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to FCUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check FCUUF's competition here
NATKY vs ISENF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while ISENF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check ISENF's competition here
NATKY vs SASKF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 222M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while SASKF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check SASKF's competition here
NATKY vs MGAFF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while MGAFF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is 45.51. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check MGAFF's competition here
NATKY vs BKLRF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while BKLRF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to BKLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check BKLRF's competition here
NATKY vs LMRXF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, LMRXF has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while LMRXF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas LMRXF's P/E ratio is -24.08. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LMRXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to LMRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check LMRXF's competition here
NATKY vs PENMF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while PENMF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to PENMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check PENMF's competition here
NATKY vs ANLDF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while ANLDF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check ANLDF's competition here
NATKY vs CVVUF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, CVVUF has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while CVVUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CVVUF's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CVVUF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to CVVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check CVVUF's competition here
NATKY vs FUUFF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while FUUFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check FUUFF's competition here
NATKY vs FISOF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while FISOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to FISOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check FISOF's competition here
NATKY vs AUEEF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while AUEEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check AUEEF's competition here
NATKY vs ELVUF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while ELVUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check ELVUF's competition here
NATKY vs LURAF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while LURAF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check LURAF's competition here
NATKY vs MMTLF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while MMTLF trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check MMTLF's competition here
NATKY vs WSTRF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while WSTRF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check WSTRF's competition here
NATKY vs NTELF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while NTELF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check NTELF's competition here
NATKY vs GVXXF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while GVXXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check GVXXF's competition here
NATKY vs PTUUF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while PTUUF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check PTUUF's competition here
NATKY vs APAAF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while APAAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to APAAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check APAAF's competition here
NATKY vs CKEFF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check CKEFF's competition here
NATKY vs KVLQF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while KVLQF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check KVLQF's competition here
NATKY vs BKUCF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +22.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check BKUCF's competition here
NATKY vs GTRIF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, GTRIF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while GTRIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas GTRIF's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTRIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to GTRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check GTRIF's competition here
NATKY vs AAUGD Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, AAUGD has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while AAUGD trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas AAUGD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AAUGD's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to AAUGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check AAUGD's competition here
NATKY vs SUUFF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while SUUFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check SUUFF's competition here
NATKY vs STTDF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, STTDF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while STTDF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas STTDF's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STTDF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to STTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check STTDF's competition here
NATKY vs ALXEF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check ALXEF's competition here
NATKY vs ADRLF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while ADRLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -10.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to ADRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check ADRLF's competition here
NATKY vs BSENF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while BSENF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check BSENF's competition here
NATKY vs AZURF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while AZURF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check AZURF's competition here
NATKY vs NRUNF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while NRUNF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to NRUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check NRUNF's competition here
NATKY vs XEPRF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 419.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while XEPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to XEPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check XEPRF's competition here
NATKY vs NVTQF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 291.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while NVTQF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to NVTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check NVTQF's competition here
NATKY vs SRSIF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SRSIF has a market cap of 23.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while SRSIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas SRSIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRSIF's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is less volatile compared to SRSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check SRSIF's competition here
NATKY vs JTCMF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while JTCMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to JTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check JTCMF's competition here
NATKY vs ENCUF Comparison May 2026
NATKY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NATKY stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ENCUF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NATKY is priced at $68.70, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NATKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.19, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NATKY's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NATKY is more volatile compared to ENCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NATKY.Check ENCUF's competition here