Stanley Electric Co., Ltd.
Stanley Electric Co., Ltd. STAEF Peers
See (STAEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAEF | $16.99 | N/A | 2.5B | 14.40 | $1.18 | +1.33% |
| CAOHF | $0.15 | +150000.00% | 91.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.57% |
| DNZOF | $14.21 | -0.35% | 40B | 15.79 | $0.90 | +3.06% |
| DNZOY | $13.41 | -0.48% | 37.8B | 13.28 | $1.01 | +0.93% |
| BRDCY | $21.37 | -0.05% | 29.1B | 15.26 | $1.40 | +2.07% |
| BRDCF | $42.40 | -0.24% | 28.7B | 15.14 | $2.80 | +3.11% |
| MGDDY | $19.10 | -0.83% | 27B | 8.55 | $2.23 | +3.96% |
| MGDDF | $37.52 | -0.69% | 26.5B | 3.36 | $11.17 | +4.15% |
| CTTAF | $89.28 | +0.15% | 17.9B | 13.49 | $6.62 | +2.79% |
Stock Comparison
STAEF vs CAOHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CAOHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs FYGGY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs DNZOF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while DNZOF trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs DNZOY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while DNZOY trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs BRDCY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while BRDCY trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs BRDCF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while BRDCF trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and BRDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs MGDDY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MGDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs MGDDF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MGDDF trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and MGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs CTTAF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CTTAF trades at $89.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and CTTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs CTTAY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CTTAY trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs KNBHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while KNBHF trades at $101.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and KNBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs KNRRY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while KNRRY trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs SMTOY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SMTOY trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs PTAIY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while PTAIY trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs PTAIF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while PTAIF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and PTAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs HLLGY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while HLLGY trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and HLLGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs HLKHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while HLKHF trades at $92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and HLKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs ASEKY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ASEKY trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ASEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs ASEKF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NGKSY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NGKSF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs SFFLY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SFFLY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and SFFLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs PLLIF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while PLLIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and PLLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs YORUF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while YORUF trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs FESTF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs KOTMF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while KOTMF trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs BRBOY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs KOTMY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while KOTMY trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and KOTMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs SCFLF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs BRBOF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while BRBOF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and BRBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs MNTHY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MNTHY trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and MNTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs YORUY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while YORUY trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and YORUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs STAEY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs LIMAF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while LIMAF trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs SMTUF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs VLEEF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while VLEEF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and VLEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs VLEEY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while VLEEY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs TDBOF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and TDBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NHKGF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NHKGF trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NHKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs VTSCF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs MNTHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs MBUMF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MBUMF trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs NPSKY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NPSKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs TGOSY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while TGOSY trades at $33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and TGOSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs ARBFF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ARBFF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ARBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NPSKF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NPSKF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NPSKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs FURCF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while FURCF trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and FURCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs JEHLY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs MBUMY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MBUMY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs GMPUF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs UNIEF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs JELCF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while JELCF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and JELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs GUDDY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs NTXVF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NTXVF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NTXVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs PASTF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs NIFCY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NKRKF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NKRKF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -27.59. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NKRKY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NKRKY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs ATNNF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 960.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ATNNF trades at $165.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ATNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs TIANF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and TIANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs GUDHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs SFHLF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs ABDDF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs FAURY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs PWRHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 647.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while PWRHF trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and PWRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs FCVFF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs MRETF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 446.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while MRETF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and MRETF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs TCISF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs SAEOF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs VTSCY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs UFMG Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while UFMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs NMAKF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NMAKF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NMAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs ELLRY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ELLRY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NPSGF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs EGKLF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while EGKLF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and EGKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NPSGY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 270M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NPSGY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs IOCJY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs XNGIF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs CMMCF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CMMCF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs AKBIF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while AKBIF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and AKBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs EXCOF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while EXCOF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and EXCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs AMGRF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs HWAFF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs WLMTF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and WLMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs SCTH Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs KGAUF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while KGAUF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and KGAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs LEAT Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while LEAT trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -165.60. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs STSGF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NWFAF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs VOAXF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs CREVF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs CCEGF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs ATHHF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while ATHHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and ATHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs OPTI Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAEF.
STAEF vs AMTY Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and AMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs NFGRF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and NFGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs AFFL Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while AFFL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and AFFL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs SPKTF Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
STAEF vs CDTI Comparison
STAEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAEF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAEF is priced at $16.99, while CDTI trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.40, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, STAEF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STAEF and CDTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).