Strateco Resources Inc.
Strateco Resources Inc. (SRSIF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRSIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRSIF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 4.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EGRAF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 15.3B | -3.77 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NATKY | $42.57 | -1.91% | 11B | 6.92 | $6.15 | +5.86% |
| SRUUF | $16.42 | +2.05% | 4.7B | -3.56 | -$4.61 | N/A |
| PALAD | $10.41 | +0.92% | 3.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CGNMF | $0.28 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 28.00 | $0.01 | +0.46% |
| PALAF | $3.91 | -1.14% | 1.5B | -97.07 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| YLLXF | $6.34 | -3.35% | 1.4B | -2.93 | -$2.16 | N/A |
| DYLLF | $0.93 | -4.12% | 905.3M | -93.05 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FCUUF | $0.50 | +0.85% | 433M | -50.42 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRSIF vs EGRAF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, EGRAF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while EGRAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRAF's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to EGRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to EGRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check EGRAF's competition here
SRSIF vs NATKY Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NATKY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while NATKY trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATKY's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to NATKY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to NATKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check NATKY's competition here
SRSIF vs SRUUF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SRUUF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while SRUUF trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRUUF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to SRUUF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to SRUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check SRUUF's competition here
SRSIF vs PALAD Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PALAD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while PALAD trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PALAD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to PALAD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to PALAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check PALAD's competition here
SRSIF vs CGNMF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CGNMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while CGNMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNMF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to CGNMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to CGNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check CGNMF's competition here
SRSIF vs PALAF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PALAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while PALAF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PALAF's P/E ratio is -97.07. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to PALAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to PALAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check PALAF's competition here
SRSIF vs YLLXF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, YLLXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while YLLXF trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YLLXF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to YLLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to YLLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check YLLXF's competition here
SRSIF vs DYLLF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DYLLF has a market cap of 905.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while DYLLF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DYLLF's P/E ratio is -93.05. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to DYLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to DYLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check DYLLF's competition here
SRSIF vs FCUUF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FCUUF has a market cap of 433M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while FCUUF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUUF's P/E ratio is -50.42. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to FCUUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to FCUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check FCUUF's competition here
SRSIF vs BNNLF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BNNLF has a market cap of 330.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while BNNLF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNNLF's P/E ratio is -53.67. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to BNNLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to BNNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check BNNLF's competition here
SRSIF vs ISENF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ISENF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while ISENF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISENF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to ISENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to ISENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check ISENF's competition here
SRSIF vs EGRAY Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, EGRAY has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while EGRAY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRAY's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to EGRAY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to EGRAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check EGRAY's competition here
SRSIF vs BKLRF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BKLRF has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while BKLRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKLRF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to BKLRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to BKLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check BKLRF's competition here
SRSIF vs SASKF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SASKF has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while SASKF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SASKF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to SASKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to SASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check SASKF's competition here
SRSIF vs AUEEF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AUEEF has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while AUEEF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUEEF's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to AUEEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to AUEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check AUEEF's competition here
SRSIF vs FUUFF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FUUFF has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while FUUFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUUFF's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to FUUFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to FUUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check FUUFF's competition here
SRSIF vs ANLDF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ANLDF has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while ANLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANLDF's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to ANLDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to ANLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check ANLDF's competition here
SRSIF vs FISOF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FISOF has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while FISOF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FISOF's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to FISOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to FISOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check FISOF's competition here
SRSIF vs MGAFF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MGAFF has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while MGAFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGAFF's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to MGAFF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to MGAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check MGAFF's competition here
SRSIF vs ELVUF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ELVUF has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while ELVUF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVUF's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to ELVUF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to ELVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check ELVUF's competition here
SRSIF vs PENMF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PENMF has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while PENMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PENMF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to PENMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to PENMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check PENMF's competition here
SRSIF vs ADRLF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ADRLF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while ADRLF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADRLF's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to ADRLF's ROE of -21.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to ADRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check ADRLF's competition here
SRSIF vs GVXXF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GVXXF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while GVXXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVXXF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to GVXXF's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to GVXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check GVXXF's competition here
SRSIF vs LURAF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, LURAF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while LURAF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LURAF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to LURAF's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to LURAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check LURAF's competition here
SRSIF vs WSTRF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WSTRF has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while WSTRF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSTRF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to WSTRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to WSTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check WSTRF's competition here
SRSIF vs NTELF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NTELF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while NTELF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTELF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to NTELF's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to NTELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check NTELF's competition here
SRSIF vs PTUUF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PTUUF has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while PTUUF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTUUF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to PTUUF's ROE of -4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to PTUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check PTUUF's competition here
SRSIF vs APAAF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, APAAF has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while APAAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APAAF's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to APAAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to APAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check APAAF's competition here
SRSIF vs MMTLF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MMTLF has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while MMTLF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMTLF's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to MMTLF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to MMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check MMTLF's competition here
SRSIF vs CKEFF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CKEFF has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while CKEFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKEFF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to CKEFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to CKEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check CKEFF's competition here
SRSIF vs BKUCF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BKUCF has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while BKUCF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKUCF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to BKUCF's ROE of +5.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to BKUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check BKUCF's competition here
SRSIF vs KVLQF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, KVLQF has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while KVLQF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVLQF's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to KVLQF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to KVLQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check KVLQF's competition here
SRSIF vs BSENF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BSENF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while BSENF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSENF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to BSENF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to BSENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check BSENF's competition here
SRSIF vs AZURF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AZURF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while AZURF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZURF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to AZURF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to AZURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check AZURF's competition here
SRSIF vs ALXEF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ALXEF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while ALXEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALXEF's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to ALXEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to ALXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check ALXEF's competition here
SRSIF vs SUUFF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SUUFF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while SUUFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUUFF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to SUUFF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to SUUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check SUUFF's competition here
SRSIF vs STTDF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, STTDF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while STTDF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STTDF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to STTDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to STTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check STTDF's competition here
SRSIF vs NVTQF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NVTQF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while NVTQF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTQF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to NVTQF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to NVTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check NVTQF's competition here
SRSIF vs NRUNF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NRUNF has a market cap of 593.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while NRUNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRUNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to NRUNF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to NRUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check NRUNF's competition here
SRSIF vs XEPRF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XEPRF has a market cap of 419.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while XEPRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEPRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to XEPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is less volatile compared to XEPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check XEPRF's competition here
SRSIF vs JTCMF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, JTCMF has a market cap of 21.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while JTCMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JTCMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to JTCMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to JTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check JTCMF's competition here
SRSIF vs ENCUF Comparison August 2025
SRSIF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRSIF stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ENCUF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRSIF is priced at $0.00, while ENCUF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRSIF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENCUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRSIF's ROE is +0.74%, compared to ENCUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRSIF is more volatile compared to ENCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRSIF.Check ENCUF's competition here