SRG Housing Finance Limited
SRG Housing Finance Limited (SRGHFL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRGHFL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRGHFL.NS | ₹247.96 | +6.60% | 3.8B | 12.73 | ₹19.06 | N/A |
| HDFC.NS | ₹2,732.00 | +0.28% | 5.1T | 19.16 | ₹142.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJHFL.NS | ₹77.22 | +1.81% | 608.7B | 24.61 | ₹2.97 | N/A |
| LICHSGFIN.NS | ₹515.55 | +1.88% | 272.4B | 4.97 | ₹99.74 | +2.02% |
| LICHSGFIN.BO | ₹515.55 | +1.85% | 272.4B | 4.97 | ₹99.72 | +2.02% |
| PNBHOUSING.BO | ₹779.70 | -1.85% | 197.1B | 9.03 | ₹83.81 | +0.66% |
| PNBHOUSING.NS | ₹780.05 | -1.84% | 196.7B | 9.01 | ₹83.76 | +0.66% |
| AADHARHFC.NS | ₹451.15 | -1.14% | 195.2B | 19.23 | ₹23.34 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.NS | ₹146.66 | -1.14% | 121.5B | 8.14 | ₹18.37 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.BO | ₹146.65 | -1.18% | 121.5B | 8.14 | ₹18.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRGHFL.NS vs HDFC.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HDFC.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while HDFC.NS trades at ₹2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas HDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDFC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to HDFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check HDFC.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs BAJAJHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BAJAJHFL.NS has a market cap of 608.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while BAJAJHFL.NS trades at ₹77.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas BAJAJHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJAJHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check BAJAJHFL.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs LICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 272.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while LICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹515.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas LICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check LICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs LICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 272.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while LICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹515.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas LICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check LICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs PNBHOUSING.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.BO has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while PNBHOUSING.BO trades at ₹779.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas PNBHOUSING.BO's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNBHOUSING.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check PNBHOUSING.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs PNBHOUSING.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.NS has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while PNBHOUSING.NS trades at ₹780.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas PNBHOUSING.NS's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNBHOUSING.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check PNBHOUSING.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs AADHARHFC.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AADHARHFC.NS has a market cap of 195.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while AADHARHFC.NS trades at ₹451.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas AADHARHFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AADHARHFC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to AADHARHFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check AADHARHFC.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs SAMMAANCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.NS has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while SAMMAANCAP.NS trades at ₹146.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas SAMMAANCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check SAMMAANCAP.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs SAMMAANCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.BO has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while SAMMAANCAP.BO trades at ₹146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas SAMMAANCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check SAMMAANCAP.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs CANFINHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.BO has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while CANFINHOME.BO trades at ₹814.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas CANFINHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANFINHOME.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to CANFINHOME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check CANFINHOME.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs CANFINHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CANFINHOME.NS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while CANFINHOME.NS trades at ₹814.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas CANFINHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANFINHOME.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to CANFINHOME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check CANFINHOME.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs IBULHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while IBULHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹164.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas IBULHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check IBULHSGFIN.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs APTUS.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APTUS.BO has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while APTUS.BO trades at ₹203.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas APTUS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APTUS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to APTUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check APTUS.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs APTUS.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APTUS.NS has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while APTUS.NS trades at ₹203.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas APTUS.NS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APTUS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to APTUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check APTUS.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs IBULHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while IBULHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹164.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas IBULHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check IBULHSGFIN.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs HOMEFIRST.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.NS has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while HOMEFIRST.NS trades at ₹950.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas HOMEFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMEFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check HOMEFIRST.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs HOMEFIRST.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.BO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while HOMEFIRST.BO trades at ₹952.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas HOMEFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOMEFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check HOMEFIRST.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs AAVAS.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAVAS.BO has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while AAVAS.BO trades at ₹1,131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas AAVAS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAVAS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to AAVAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check AAVAS.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs AAVAS.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAVAS.NS has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while AAVAS.NS trades at ₹1,134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas AAVAS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAVAS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to AAVAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check AAVAS.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs INDIASHLTR.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.NS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while INDIASHLTR.NS trades at ₹755.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas INDIASHLTR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDIASHLTR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check INDIASHLTR.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs INDIASHLTR.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.BO has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while INDIASHLTR.BO trades at ₹755.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas INDIASHLTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDIASHLTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check INDIASHLTR.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs REPCOHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while REPCOHOME.BO trades at ₹362.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas REPCOHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REPCOHOME.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check REPCOHOME.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs REPCOHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REPCOHOME.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while REPCOHOME.NS trades at ₹363.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas REPCOHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REPCOHOME.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check REPCOHOME.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs GICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while GICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas GICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check GICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs GICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while GICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹139.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas GICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check GICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs SRGHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SRGHFL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while SRGHFL.BO trades at ₹230.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas SRGHFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRGHFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to SRGHFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check SRGHFL.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs RELHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RELHOME.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while RELHOME.BO trades at ₹6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas RELHOME.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RELHOME.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to RELHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check RELHOME.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs RHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RHFL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while RHFL.BO trades at ₹2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas RHFL.BO's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHFL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to RHFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check RHFL.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs RHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RHFL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while RHFL.NS trades at ₹2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas RHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHFL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to RHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check RHFL.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs TFL.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TFL.NS has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while TFL.NS trades at ₹12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas TFL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFL.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to TFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check TFL.NS's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs TFL.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TFL.BO has a market cap of 606.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while TFL.BO trades at ₹12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas TFL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to TFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check TFL.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs RFL.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RFL.BO has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while RFL.BO trades at ₹106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas RFL.BO's P/E ratio is -183.82. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to RFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check RFL.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs CMXLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CMXLTD.BO has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while CMXLTD.BO trades at ₹27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas CMXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -52.53. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is less volatile compared to CMXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check CMXLTD.BO's competition here
SRGHFL.NS vs DHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
SRGHFL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRGHFL.NS stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DHFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRGHFL.NS is priced at ₹247.96, while DHFL.NS trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRGHFL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.73, whereas DHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SRGHFL.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRGHFL.NS is more volatile compared to DHFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRGHFL.NS.Check DHFL.NS's competition here