Spirit Realty Capital, Inc.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GMGSF has a market cap of 40.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GMGSF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GMGSF's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GMGSF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GMGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 33.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while VICI trades at $31.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 13.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while WPC trades at $61.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, NIPPF has a market cap of 11.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while NIPPF trades at $4,603.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas NIPPF's P/E ratio is 162.32. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to NIPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, STKAF has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while STKAF trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas STKAF's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to STKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MRPRF has a market cap of 7.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MRPRF trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MRPRF's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRPRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to MRPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while EPRT trades at $31.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GSEFF has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GSEFF trades at $55.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GSEFF's P/E ratio is 78.03. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSEFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GSEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GPTGF has a market cap of 6.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GPTGF trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GPTGF's P/E ratio is -45.71. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPTGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GPTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, LDSCY has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while LDSCY trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas LDSCY's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDSCY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to LDSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, LSGOF has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while LSGOF trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas LSGOF's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LSGOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to LSGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, UTGPF has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while UTGPF trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas UTGPF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UTGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to UTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, BTLCY has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while BTLCY trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas BTLCY's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTLCY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to BTLCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, LNSPF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while LNSPF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas LNSPF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNSPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to LNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GNL-PD trades at $22.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GNL-PE trades at $22.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, BRLAF has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while BRLAF trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas BRLAF's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRLAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to BRLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, FBASF has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while FBASF trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas FBASF's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FBASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to FBASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GNL-PB trades at $21.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -156.99. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, DEXSF has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while DEXSF trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas DEXSF's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEXSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to DEXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CTOUF has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CTOUF trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CTOUF's P/E ratio is 235.63. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTOUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to CTOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while DBRG-PH trades at $22.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -30.02. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while DBRG-PI trades at $22.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -29.85. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, JPRRF has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while JPRRF trades at $3,900.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas JPRRF's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JPRRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to JPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while DBRG-PJ trades at $22.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AFINP trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AFINO trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CFMOF has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CFMOF trades at $62.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CFMOF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFMOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CFMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, UUICF has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while UUICF trades at $998.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas UUICF's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UUICF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to UUICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while BNL trades at $16.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SURVF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SURVF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SURVF's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SURVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to SURVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GWWTF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GWWTF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GWWTF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GWWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GWWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, ATTRF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while ATTRF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas ATTRF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATTRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to ATTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while UE trades at $18.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, ATVXF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while ATVXF trades at $2,746.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas ATVXF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATVXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to ATVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CROMF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CROMF trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CROMF's P/E ratio is -521.00. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CROMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CROMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, HRUFF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while HRUFF trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas HRUFF's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HRUFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to HRUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GNL trades at $7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GNL-PA trades at $22.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -164.12. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CDMGF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CDMGF trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CDMGF's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDMGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CDMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SHABF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SHABF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SHABF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHABF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to SHABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while DBRG trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, XIORF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while XIORF trades at $31.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas XIORF's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XIORF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to XIORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CLNY trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNY's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CLNC trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while ALEX trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while ESRT trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CHLWF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CHLWF trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CHLWF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHLWF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to CHLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AFIN trades at $8.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AAT trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, TKURF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while TKURF trades at $1,176.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas TKURF's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKURF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to TKURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SAFE trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while RTL trades at $7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AOTUF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AOTUF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AOTUF's P/E ratio is -66.06. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AOTUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AOTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, RETDF has a market cap of 944.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while RETDF trades at $4.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas RETDF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RETDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to RETDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, KWIPF has a market cap of 796.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while KWIPF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas KWIPF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KWIPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to KWIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, LAREF has a market cap of 705.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while LAREF trades at $8.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas LAREF's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LAREF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to LAREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 699.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AHH trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 694.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AHH-PA trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 91.32. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 687.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while BRSP trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while STAR trades at $7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SHTRF has a market cap of 656.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SHTRF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SHTRF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to SHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 655.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GOODN trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -655.55. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 654.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GOODO trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 698.62. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 644.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GOOD trades at $14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 52.19. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, YUXXF has a market cap of 643.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while YUXXF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas YUXXF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YUXXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to YUXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 594.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CTO-PA trades at $21.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 593.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CTO trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, IGPYF has a market cap of 586.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while IGPYF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas IGPYF's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IGPYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to IGPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 525.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while OLP trades at $24.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, ARESF has a market cap of 522.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while ARESF trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas ARESF's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARESF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to ARESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 417.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PKST trades at $11.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -37.88. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, IMMQF has a market cap of 381.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while IMMQF trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas IMMQF's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMMQF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to IMMQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MGRUF has a market cap of 253.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MGRUF trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MGRUF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGRUF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to MGRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PREUF has a market cap of 250.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PREUF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PREUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PREUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to PREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 248.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MDV-PA trades at $24.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 219.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while FVR trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, BTBIF has a market cap of 216.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while BTBIF trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas BTBIF's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to BTBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, FRMUF has a market cap of 161.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while FRMUF trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas FRMUF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRMUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to FRMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 157.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MDV trades at $15.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is 62.36. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, FREVS has a market cap of 126.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while FREVS trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas FREVS's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FREVS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to FREVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CNNRF has a market cap of 80.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CNNRF trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CNNRF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNNRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to CNNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, HHDS has a market cap of 65.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while HHDS trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas HHDS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HHDS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to HHDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, DDHRF has a market cap of 37.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while DDHRF trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas DDHRF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DDHRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to DDHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 20.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MDRR trades at $11.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is 594.00. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 19.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MKZR trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SQFTP trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -25.78. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 9.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SQFT trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 8.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GIPR trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 7.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while SQFTW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while CORR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 979774.00. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GIPRW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GADS has a market cap of 73071.00. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GADS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GADS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GADS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to GADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PDNLB has a market cap of 13800.00. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PDNLB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PDNLB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PDNLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to PDNLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, AQQSQ has a market cap of 370.00. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while AQQSQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas AQQSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AQQSQ's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to AQQSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, STOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while STOR trades at $32.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STOR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PSB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PSB trades at $187.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, ABPPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while ABPPF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas ABPPF's P/E ratio is 3.86. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABPPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to ABPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PSB-PZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, VER comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while VER trades at $51.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, PSB-PX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, GOODM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while GOODM trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, FSPR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while FSPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, VER-PF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, MGP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while MGP trades at $41.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.

SRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SRC stands at 6.08B. In comparison, APTS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SRC is priced at $42.98, while APTS trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SRC currently has a P/E ratio of 24.42, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRC is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRC.