Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See SQU.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for SQU.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQU.DE | €119.45 | +0.08% | 65.9B | 13.52 | €8.78 | +4.21% |
| HOT.DE | €429.60 | +0.47% | 32B | 35.61 | €11.94 | +1.55% |
| XD4.DE | €86.90 | +2.12% | 9.9B | 21.16 | €4.04 | +3.39% |
| 3OY1.BE | €12.77 | -0.39% | 4.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.79% |
| 3OY1.SG | €12.04 | +0.33% | 3.9B | 15.27 | €0.79 | +4.87% |
| 3OY1.MU | €12.01 | -0.58% | 3.9B | 15.35 | €0.79 | +4.80% |
| 3OY1.DU | €12.14 | +1.85% | 3.8B | 14.47 | €0.82 | +4.91% |
| GBF.DE | €75.50 | +0.13% | 2.7B | 14.21 | €5.23 | +3.79% |
| ABS2.DE | €39.95 | +3.90% | 1.5B | 12.20 | €3.19 | +2.70% |
| NCH2.DE | €7.87 | +0.51% | 985.3M | -14.85 | -€0.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Hochtief AG (XETRA: HOT.DE)
SQU.DE vs HOT.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, HOT.DE has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while HOT.DE trades at €429.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas HOT.DE's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOT.DE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to HOT.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check HOT.DE's competition here
Strabag Se (XETRA: XD4.DE)
SQU.DE vs XD4.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, XD4.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while XD4.DE trades at €86.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas XD4.DE's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XD4.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to XD4.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check XD4.DE's competition here
Maire Tecnimont S.p.A. (BER: 3OY1.BE)
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.BE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, 3OY1.BE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while 3OY1.BE trades at €12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas 3OY1.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.BE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 3OY1.BE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.BE's competition here
Maire Tecnimont S.p.A. (STU: 3OY1.SG)
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.SG Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, 3OY1.SG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while 3OY1.SG trades at €12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas 3OY1.SG's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.SG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.SG's competition here
Maire Tecnimont S.p.A. (MUN: 3OY1.MU)
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.MU Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, 3OY1.MU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while 3OY1.MU trades at €12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas 3OY1.MU's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.MU's competition here
Maire Tecnimont S.p.A. (DUS: 3OY1.DU)
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.DU Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, 3OY1.DU has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while 3OY1.DU trades at €12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas 3OY1.DU's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.DU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.DU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.DU's competition here
Bilfinger SE (XETRA: GBF.DE)
SQU.DE vs GBF.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, GBF.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while GBF.DE trades at €75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas GBF.DE's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBF.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to GBF.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check GBF.DE's competition here
PORR AG (XETRA: ABS2.DE)
SQU.DE vs ABS2.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, ABS2.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while ABS2.DE trades at €39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas ABS2.DE's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABS2.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to ABS2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check ABS2.DE's competition here
thyssenkrupp nucera AG & Co. KGaA (XETRA: NCH2.DE)
SQU.DE vs NCH2.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, NCH2.DE has a market cap of 985.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while NCH2.DE trades at €7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas NCH2.DE's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCH2.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to NCH2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check NCH2.DE's competition here
Bauer AG (XETRA: B5A.DE)
SQU.DE vs B5A.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, B5A.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while B5A.DE trades at €6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas B5A.DE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B5A.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to B5A.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B5A.DE's competition here
SRV Yhtiöt Oyj (XETRA: B7J1.DE)
SQU.DE vs B7J1.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, B7J1.DE has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while B7J1.DE trades at €7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas B7J1.DE's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B7J1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to B7J1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B7J1.DE's competition here
SRV Yhtiöt Oyj (XETRA: B7J.DE)
SQU.DE vs B7J.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, B7J.DE has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while B7J.DE trades at €6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas B7J.DE's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B7J.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to B7J.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B7J.DE's competition here
ABO Energy GmbH & Co. KGaA (XETRA: AB9.DE)
SQU.DE vs AB9.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, AB9.DE has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while AB9.DE trades at €3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas AB9.DE's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AB9.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to AB9.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check AB9.DE's competition here
Muehlhan AG (XETRA: M4N.DE)
SQU.DE vs M4N.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, M4N.DE has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while M4N.DE trades at €1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas M4N.DE's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to M4N.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to M4N.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check M4N.DE's competition here
VST Building Technologies AG (XETRA: 1T2.DE)
SQU.DE vs 1T2.DE Comparison August 2026
Vinci S.A. (XETRA: SQU.DE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 65.9B. In comparison, 1T2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €119.45 on the XETRA, while 1T2.DE trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.52, whereas 1T2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1T2.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 1T2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 1T2.DE's competition here