Vinci S.A.
Vinci S.A. (SQU.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SQU.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQU.DE | €131.60 | -0.64% | 73.2B | 15.21 | €8.65 | +3.61% |
| HOT.DE | €406.20 | +0.15% | 30.6B | 33.91 | €11.98 | +1.29% |
| XD4.DE | €88.00 | -1.79% | 10.2B | 12.01 | €7.33 | +2.84% |
| 3OY1.SG | €13.75 | +0.36% | 4.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.59% |
| 3OY1.F | €13.74 | -1.58% | 4.5B | 17.18 | €0.80 | +2.59% |
| 3OY1.DU | €13.68 | +0.37% | 4.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.60% |
| 3OY1.MU | €13.44 | +1.74% | 4.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.65% |
| 3OY1.BE | €12.77 | -0.39% | 4.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.79% |
| GBF.DE | €102.10 | -0.97% | 3.8B | 20.58 | €4.96 | +2.05% |
| ABS2.DE | €37.05 | -1.98% | 1.5B | 12.35 | €3.00 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
SQU.DE vs HOT.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, HOT.DE has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while HOT.DE trades at €406.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas HOT.DE's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOT.DE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to HOT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check HOT.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs XD4.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, XD4.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while XD4.DE trades at €88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas XD4.DE's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XD4.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to XD4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check XD4.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.SG Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, 3OY1.SG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while 3OY1.SG trades at €13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas 3OY1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.SG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.SG's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.F Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, 3OY1.F has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while 3OY1.F trades at €13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas 3OY1.F's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.F's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.F's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.DU Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, 3OY1.DU has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while 3OY1.DU trades at €13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas 3OY1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.DU's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 3OY1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.DU's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.MU Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, 3OY1.MU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while 3OY1.MU trades at €13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas 3OY1.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.MU's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 3OY1.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.MU's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.BE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, 3OY1.BE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while 3OY1.BE trades at €12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas 3OY1.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.BE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 3OY1.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.BE's competition here
SQU.DE vs GBF.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, GBF.DE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while GBF.DE trades at €102.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas GBF.DE's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBF.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to GBF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check GBF.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs ABS2.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, ABS2.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while ABS2.DE trades at €37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas ABS2.DE's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABS2.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to ABS2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check ABS2.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs B5A.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, B5A.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while B5A.DE trades at €6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas B5A.DE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B5A.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to B5A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B5A.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs B7J.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, B7J.DE has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while B7J.DE trades at €6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas B7J.DE's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B7J.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B7J.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs B7J1.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, B7J1.DE has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while B7J1.DE trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas B7J1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B7J1.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to B7J1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B7J1.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs AB9.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, AB9.DE has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while AB9.DE trades at €5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas AB9.DE's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AB9.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to AB9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check AB9.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs M4N.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, M4N.DE has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while M4N.DE trades at €1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas M4N.DE's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to M4N.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to M4N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check M4N.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs 1T2.DE Comparison April 2026
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 73.2B. In comparison, 1T2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €131.60, while 1T2.DE trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 15.21, whereas 1T2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1T2.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 1T2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 1T2.DE's competition here