Vinci S.A.
Vinci S.A. (SQU.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SQU.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQU.DE | €118.90 | -2.26% | 67B | 14.31 | €8.31 | +4.00% |
| HOT.DE | €186.40 | -2.76% | 14B | 17.12 | €10.89 | +2.81% |
| XD4.DE | €79.60 | -4.10% | 9.2B | 10.83 | €7.35 | +3.14% |
| 3OY1.MU | €12.22 | +1.33% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +2.91% |
| 3OY1.DU | €11.54 | -3.51% | 3.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.08% |
| 3OY1.BE | €11.93 | +0.25% | 3.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.98% |
| 3OY1.SG | €11.76 | +0.86% | 3.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.03% |
| 3OY1.F | €11.63 | -3.49% | 3.8B | 16.38 | €0.71 | +3.06% |
| GBF.DE | €90.90 | -4.01% | 3.4B | 18.51 | €4.91 | +2.30% |
| ABS2.DE | €28.60 | -3.87% | 1.1B | 12.38 | €2.31 | +3.15% |
Stock Comparison
SQU.DE vs HOT.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, HOT.DE has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while HOT.DE trades at €186.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas HOT.DE's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOT.DE's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to HOT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check HOT.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs XD4.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, XD4.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while XD4.DE trades at €79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas XD4.DE's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XD4.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to XD4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check XD4.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.MU Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, 3OY1.MU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while 3OY1.MU trades at €12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas 3OY1.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.MU's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 3OY1.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.MU's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.DU Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, 3OY1.DU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while 3OY1.DU trades at €11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas 3OY1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.DU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.DU's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.BE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, 3OY1.BE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while 3OY1.BE trades at €11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas 3OY1.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.BE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 3OY1.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.BE's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.SG Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, 3OY1.SG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while 3OY1.SG trades at €11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas 3OY1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.SG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.SG's competition here
SQU.DE vs 3OY1.F Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, 3OY1.F has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while 3OY1.F trades at €11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas 3OY1.F's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3OY1.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to 3OY1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 3OY1.F's competition here
SQU.DE vs GBF.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, GBF.DE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while GBF.DE trades at €90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas GBF.DE's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBF.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to GBF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check GBF.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs ABS2.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, ABS2.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while ABS2.DE trades at €28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas ABS2.DE's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABS2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to ABS2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check ABS2.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs AB9.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, AB9.DE has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while AB9.DE trades at €38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas AB9.DE's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AB9.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to AB9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check AB9.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs B5A.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, B5A.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while B5A.DE trades at €6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas B5A.DE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B5A.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to B5A.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B5A.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs B7J.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, B7J.DE has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while B7J.DE trades at €6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas B7J.DE's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to B7J.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check B7J.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs M4N.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, M4N.DE has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while M4N.DE trades at €1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas M4N.DE's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to M4N.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to M4N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check M4N.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs TUF.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, TUF.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while TUF.DE trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas TUF.DE's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TUF.DE's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is less volatile compared to TUF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check TUF.DE's competition here
SQU.DE vs 1T2.DE Comparison August 2025
SQU.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQU.DE stands at 67B. In comparison, 1T2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQU.DE is priced at €118.90, while 1T2.DE trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQU.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.31, whereas 1T2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQU.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 1T2.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQU.DE is more volatile compared to 1T2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQU.DE.Check 1T2.DE's competition here