Specialty Liquid Transportation Corp.
Specialty Liquid Transportation Corp. (SPQDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SPQDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPQDF | $0.00 | +0.00% | 15.2M | -0.01 | -$0.45 | N/A |
| DSSMY | $30.00 | +14.90% | 41.5B | 37.04 | $0.81 | +3.38% |
| NPKLY | $21.00 | +84.21% | 34.7B | -2100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| INPAP | $80.00 | +0.00% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.00% |
| SMFTF | $49.11 | N/A | 25.5B | 15.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| SMFKY | $45.96 | -0.13% | 24.8B | 14.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| AMCCF | $9.60 | +1.48% | 22.1B | 17.14 | $0.56 | +5.32% |
| DITHF | $7.22 | -3.86% | 10B | 36.10 | $0.20 | +3.27% |
| CCDBF | $56.10 | -1.36% | 9.9B | 16.06 | $3.53 | +1.54% |
| CCLLF | $52.88 | +0.00% | 9B | 15.07 | $3.51 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
SPQDF vs DSSMY Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check DSSMY's competition here
SPQDF vs NPKLY Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check NPKLY's competition here
SPQDF vs INPAP Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while INPAP trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to INPAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check INPAP's competition here
SPQDF vs SMFTF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SMFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SMFTF's competition here
SPQDF vs SMFKY Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SMFKY's competition here
SPQDF vs AMCCF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while AMCCF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to AMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check AMCCF's competition here
SPQDF vs DITHF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while DITHF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check DITHF's competition here
SPQDF vs CCDBF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while CCDBF trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check CCDBF's competition here
SPQDF vs CCLLF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while CCLLF trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check CCLLF's competition here
SPQDF vs SCBGF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SCBGF trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SCBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SCBGF's competition here
SPQDF vs SIGCY Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SIGCY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SIGCY's competition here
SPQDF vs VDRFF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while VDRFF trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to VDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check VDRFF's competition here
SPQDF vs HOYFF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while HOYFF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to HOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check HOYFF's competition here
SPQDF vs WIPKF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while WIPKF trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check WIPKF's competition here
SPQDF vs ORRYY Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while ORRYY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check ORRYY's competition here
SPQDF vs ORRAF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while ORRAF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to ORRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check ORRAF's competition here
SPQDF vs MNHFF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check MNHFF's competition here
SPQDF vs FUJSF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while FUJSF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check FUJSF's competition here
SPQDF vs FRFTF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check FRFTF's competition here
SPQDF vs ELPKF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while ELPKF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check ELPKF's competition here
SPQDF vs PCTGY Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to PCTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check PCTGY's competition here
SPQDF vs CADNF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 668.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while CADNF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -220.00. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to CADNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check CADNF's competition here
SPQDF vs GRVWF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to GRVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check GRVWF's competition here
SPQDF vs JSPCF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to JSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check JSPCF's competition here
SPQDF vs HXGCF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while HXGCF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check HXGCF's competition here
SPQDF vs SNGSF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SNGSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SNGSF's competition here
SPQDF vs VKSC Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while VKSC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to VKSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check VKSC's competition here
SPQDF vs SUMXF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SUMXF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SUMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SUMXF's competition here
SPQDF vs IFLXF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while IFLXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to IFLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check IFLXF's competition here
SPQDF vs YIKWF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to YIKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check YIKWF's competition here
SPQDF vs NEXNF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while NEXNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check NEXNF's competition here
SPQDF vs IDND Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while IDND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check IDND's competition here
SPQDF vs MAYX Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while MAYX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to MAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check MAYX's competition here
SPQDF vs RDVA Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while RDVA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check RDVA's competition here
SPQDF vs GDNPF Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 976K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to GDNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check GDNPF's competition here
SPQDF vs SINC Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 180.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while SINC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to SINC's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to SINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check SINC's competition here
SPQDF vs EPTI Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while EPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check EPTI's competition here
SPQDF vs TZPC Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 41.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while TZPC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check TZPC's competition here
SPQDF vs ACGX Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 36.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while ACGX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to ACGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check ACGX's competition here
SPQDF vs PGOG Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while PGOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to PGOG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check PGOG's competition here
SPQDF vs ACTX Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while ACTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to ACTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check ACTX's competition here
SPQDF vs GPRC Comparison July 2025
SPQDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPQDF stands at 15.2M. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, SPQDF is priced at $0.00, while GPRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPQDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPQDF's ROE is -1.84%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPQDF is more volatile compared to GPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPQDF.Check GPRC's competition here