Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Daily Hedged D-EUR
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Daily Hedged D-EUR SP5H.PA Peers
See (SP5H.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP5H.PA | $293.65 | +0.48% | 18.30B | 26.04 | $11.27 | +1.27% |
| IWDA.AS | $100.95 | +0.73% | 92.32B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | $100.86 | +0.78% | 57.01B | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| VWRL.AS | $129.20 | +0.72% | 33.44B | N/A | N/A | +1.57% |
| IUSA.AS | $53.01 | +0.79% | 15.68B | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| ISFA.AS | $10.18 | +0.84% | 14.99B | N/A | N/A | +3.44% |
| AMUN.PA | $73.15 | -1.35% | 14.88B | 11.48 | $6.37 | +5.60% |
| HAL.AS | $120.80 | +1.34% | 10.91B | 9.02 | $13.39 | +2.36% |
| PSH.AS | $51.60 | N/A | 9.41B | 4.41 | $11.69 | +1.20% |
| WLD.PA | $344.22 | +0.65% | 9.31B | 23.07 | $14.92 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
SP5H.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 92.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IWDA.AS trades at $100.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 57.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while VUSA.AS trades at $100.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 33.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while VWRL.AS trades at $129.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IUSA.AS trades at $53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ISFA.AS trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 14.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while AMUN.PA trades at $73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 10.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while HAL.AS trades at $120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while PSH.AS trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while WLD.PA trades at $344.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while WLDH.PA trades at $212.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CSH2.PA trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while MEUD.PA trades at $261.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IMEU.AS trades at $34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while GBLB.BR trades at $72.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 302.29. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while SOF.BR trades at $258.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs I500.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while I500.AS trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while I50D.AS trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while LCWD.PA trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IWRD.AS trades at $73.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CC4.PA trades at $222.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while VHYL.AS trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs 500.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while 500.PA trades at $104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while AEME.PA trades at $69.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while PHAU.AS trades at $265.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 5.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while GOLD.PA trades at $113.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CW8.PA trades at $551.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IJPA.AS trades at $52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while VEUR.AS trades at $43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while SP5C.PA trades at $381.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ECRP.PA trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs RF.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while RF.PA trades at $68.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while KBCA.BR trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs S500.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while S500.PA trades at $150.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while S500H.PA trades at $83.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EUEA.AS trades at $55.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IEMM.AS trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while USAC.PA trades at $540.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while REINA.AS trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs USA.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while USA.PA trades at $495.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while 500X.AS trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CACC.PA trades at $38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CAC.PA trades at $78.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ICHD.AS trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ICHN.AS trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while WSRI.PA trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while C50U.PA trades at $157.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while MSE.PA trades at $59.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs MF.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while MF.PA trades at $91.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -31.19. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while AUEM.PA trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs C50.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while C50.PA trades at $141.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CD5.PA trades at $86.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ROLA.AS trades at $64.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while BREB.BR trades at $117.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while VERX.AS trades at $43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while TKO.PA trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while AEEM.PA trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ALLFG.AS trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CB3.PA trades at $220.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while WESE.PA trades at $69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EEUE.PA trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs UST.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while UST.PA trades at $77.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while SEMD.AS trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ESE.PA trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EUSRI.PA trades at $86.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while GEMU.PA trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EHYA.AS trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EPAB.PA trades at $36.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while TDIV.AS trades at $43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EXCH.AS trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ANX.PA trades at $218.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while USRI.PA trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs PABW.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while PABW.PA trades at $77.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while PEUG.PA trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CMUD.PA trades at $67.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ANTIN.PA trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while BNKE.PA trades at $239.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while TNOW.PA trades at $816.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EGOV.PA trades at $49.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while MUSD.AS trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs WAT.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while WAT.PA trades at $68.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs GIMB.BR Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while GIMB.BR trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EMPA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EMPA.AS trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs MPAB.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while MPAB.AS trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EGRI.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EGRI.PA trades at $45.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while AASI.PA trades at $39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs CG1.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while CG1.PA trades at $421.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs INR.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while INR.PA trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs LWCR.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while LWCR.PA trades at $504.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ACWI.PA trades at $476.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while BNK.PA trades at $45.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while PHAG.AS trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while EXA1.AS trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs WQDA.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while WQDA.AS trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs DAX.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while DAX.PA trades at $217.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ESGE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ESGE.PA trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is less volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs ESGH.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while ESGH.PA trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs MTE.PA Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, MTE.PA has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while MTE.PA trades at $199.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MTE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to MTE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs TFG.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while TFG.AS trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.
SP5H.PA vs IX5A.AS Comparison
SP5H.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5H.PA stands at 18.30B. In comparison, IX5A.AS has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5H.PA is priced at $293.65, while IX5A.AS trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5H.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IX5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5H.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IX5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5H.PA is more volatile compared to IX5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5H.PA.