Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF SP5C.PA Peers
See (SP5C.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP5C.PA | €388.68 | +0.72% | 19.7B | 26.73 | €14.51 | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €102.67 | +1.02% | 95.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €102.54 | +0.79% | 61B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| VWRL.AS | €130.78 | +0.94% | 36.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.57% |
| SP5H.PA | €314.25 | +1.11% | 19.9B | 27.26 | €11.45 | +2.00% |
| IUSA.AS | €53.88 | +0.76% | 16.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.06% |
| ISFA.AS | €10.25 | +1.29% | 14.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.46% |
| AMUN.PA | €70.95 | -0.49% | 14.5B | 11.17 | €6.37 | +5.97% |
| HAL.AS | €124.60 | -0.16% | 11.3B | 9.31 | €13.39 | +2.33% |
| CSH2.PA | €107.00 | +0.00% | 9.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SP5C.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IWDA.AS trades at €102.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while VUSA.AS trades at €102.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while VWRL.AS trades at €130.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while SP5H.PA trades at €314.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IUSA.AS trades at €53.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ISFA.AS trades at €10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while AMUN.PA trades at €70.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while HAL.AS trades at €124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CSH2.PA trades at €107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while WLD.PA trades at €350.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while WLDH.PA trades at €225.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while SOF.BR trades at €270.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while MEUD.PA trades at €263.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IMEU.AS trades at €34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while GBLB.BR trades at €75.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 314.79. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs I500.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while I500.AS trades at €10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while I50D.AS trades at €7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while GOLD.PA trades at €113.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IWRD.AS trades at €74.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CEUU.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CEUU.AS trades at €10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while VHYL.AS trades at €64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CC4.PA trades at €225.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs 500.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while 500.PA trades at €106.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while AEME.PA trades at €72.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CW8.PA trades at €560.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IJPA.AS trades at €53.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while REINA.AS trades at €25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while VEUR.AS trades at €42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs UST.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while UST.PA trades at €79.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while S500H.PA trades at €89.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs S500.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while S500.PA trades at €154.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while KBCA.BR trades at €62.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IEMM.AS trades at €42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ALLFG.AS trades at €7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -26.55. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EUEA.AS trades at €55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs RF.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while RF.PA trades at €55.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while USAC.PA trades at €546.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs USA.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while USA.PA trades at €504.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while 500X.AS trades at €38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while C50U.PA trades at €164.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CAC.PA trades at €78.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CACC.PA trades at €38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs MF.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while MF.PA trades at €92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -31.98. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while MSE.PA trades at €59.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while VERX.AS trades at €42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs GLUH.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while TKO.PA trades at €20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CD5.PA trades at €86.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs C50.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while C50.PA trades at €139.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ROLA.AS trades at €65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EHYD.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while BREB.BR trades at €112.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while SEMD.AS trades at €5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EEUE.PA trades at €17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while WESE.PA trades at €72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CB3.PA trades at €219.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs IGLE.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while IGLE.AS trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ESE.PA trades at €27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while TDIV.AS trades at €43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EUSRI.PA trades at €85.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs SUOA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EPAB.PA trades at €35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while BNKE.PA trades at €255.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while TNOW.PA trades at €862.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 40.55. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ANX.PA trades at €225.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EXCH.AS trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs TI5A.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while TI5A.AS trades at €112.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ANTIN.PA trades at €11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs PABW.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while PABW.PA trades at €78.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while PEUG.PA trades at €78.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while ACWI.PA trades at €484.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CMUD.PA trades at €67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while PHAG.AS trades at €30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CNYB.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CNYB.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CNYB.AS trades at €5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CNYB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CNYB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to CNYB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs WAT.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while WAT.PA trades at €68.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while AASI.PA trades at €40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs CG1.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while CG1.PA trades at €430.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EMPA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EMPA.AS trades at €6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs MPAB.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while MPAB.AS trades at €5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs GIMB.BR Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while GIMB.BR trades at €43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while EXA1.AS trades at €13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs WQDA.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while WQDA.AS trades at €9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs INR.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while INR.PA trades at €27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs LWCR.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while LWCR.PA trades at €509.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is more volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs TFG.AS Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while TFG.AS trades at €17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.
SP5C.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison
SP5C.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SP5C.PA stands at 19.7B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SP5C.PA is priced at €388.68, while BNK.PA trades at €47.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SP5C.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SP5C.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SP5C.PA is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SP5C.PA.