Syntrol Corp.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 66.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CRH trades at $98.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 62.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while HCMLY trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 59.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while HCMLF trades at $107.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to HCMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CRHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 35.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while VMC trades at $270.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 35.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while HLBZF trades at $203.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 32.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while MLM trades at $542.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 30.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and UCLQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and GRSXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 18.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and BHBSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 17.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while AHCHY trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and IMYSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 12.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while JHIUF trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while JHX trades at $23.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BZZUY trades at $26.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while SUM trades at $52.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CXMSF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CXMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BZZUF trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 8.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CX trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while EXP trades at $235.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and TGBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while KNF trades at $97.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while HDELY trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CBUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while XYIGY trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and XYIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while WBRBY trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while XYIGF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to XYIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BOALF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BOALY trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and BOALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BCC trades at $92.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while TGLS trades at $74.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and WBRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while THYCY trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and THYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while GCWOF trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while USLM trades at $99.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while THYCF trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to THYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while IMYSF trades at $33.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -26.12. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CMZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while TTAM trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TTAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BRKWF trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -73.88. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while FCREY trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while FRCEF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and HCPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while SDCVF trades at $38.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CARCY trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 50.90. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CARCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PITPF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CJRCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and ADBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CCGLF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CCGLF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCGLF's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CCGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PSGTY trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and PSGTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PITPY trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 983.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while WCHNF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to WCHNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and PTHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 858.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 811.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 810.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PSGTF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 629.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while MCEM trades at $247.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 624.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CMTOY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CMTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 560.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while FTTRF trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and FTTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 517.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 446.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CWXZF trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 352.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PPCLY trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and PPCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 297.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while TGAFF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and TGAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 257.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while LOMA trades at $11.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 217.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CHYMF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CHYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 162.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while SMID trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 114.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BSND trades at $850.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BSND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 93.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CPAC trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 87.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while FEAM trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -9.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 75.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BURCP trades at $53.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and BURCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 75.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CBUMY trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and SPPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and ZHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 45.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while LKSGF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and RTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 34.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while STAI trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to STAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 26.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CTXXF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CTXXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and PTHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 16.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while ACPS trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and ACPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 15.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CAPT trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while RETO trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 9.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while BASA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8723.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while PNLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and PNLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2680.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while CHGS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CHGS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and CHGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while WWST trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and WWST have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, AQCP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while AQCP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and AQCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, TJSS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while TJSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, USCR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while USCR trades at $73.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP is less volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNLP.

SNLP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNLP stands at 3451.00. In comparison, LXRRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SNLP is priced at $0.00, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNLP currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNLP's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNLP and LXRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).