Steinhoff International Holdings N.V.
Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SNH.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SNH.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNH.DE | €0.16 | +0.00% | 670.7M | -0.69 | -€0.23 | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | €174.30 | -4.53% | 1.9T | 28.07 | €6.21 | N/A |
| AHLA.F | €106.80 | -1.48% | 253.5B | 21.99 | €4.83 | +1.61% |
| 2RR.F | €13.36 | -1.04% | 252.6B | 22.04 | €0.60 | +1.64% |
| AHLA.DE | €106.80 | -1.48% | 247.9B | 22.11 | €4.83 | +1.60% |
| IXD1.DE | €49.57 | -1.84% | 154.5B | 24.79 | €2.00 | +2.75% |
| MLB1.DE | €1,392.20 | -1.90% | 70.6B | 40.87 | €34.06 | N/A |
| EBA.DE | €77.10 | -0.89% | 34.5B | 20.89 | €3.69 | +1.32% |
| 013A.F | €25.00 | -1.77% | 34.1B | 15.34 | €1.62 | +3.51% |
| ZAL.DE | €20.13 | -2.47% | 5.2B | 24.55 | €0.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SNH.DE vs AMZ.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while AMZ.DE trades at €174.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs AHLA.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 253.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while AHLA.F trades at €106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check AHLA.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs 2RR.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 252.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 2RR.F trades at €13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 2RR.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs AHLA.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 247.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while AHLA.DE trades at €106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs IXD1.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while IXD1.DE trades at €49.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check IXD1.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs MLB1.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while MLB1.DE trades at €1,392.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs EBA.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while EBA.DE trades at €77.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check EBA.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs 013A.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 013A.F trades at €25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 013A.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs ZAL.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while ZAL.DE trades at €20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs DHER.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while DHER.DE trades at €16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check DHER.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs 3E2.BE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 3E2.BE trades at €47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
SNH.DE vs 3E2.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 3E2.F trades at €41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 3E2.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs 3E2.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 3E2.DE trades at €41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs ZO1.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs CEC.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while CEC.DE trades at €4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 441.00. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check CEC.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs YOU.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while YOU.DE trades at €6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check YOU.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs YOU.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while YOU.F trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check YOU.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs DOU.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, DOU.F has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while DOU.F trades at €9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DOU.F's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOU.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to DOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check DOU.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs 8WZ.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 719.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs G5NA.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs H24.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check H24.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs 91N0.SG Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, 91N0.SG has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while 91N0.SG trades at €15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 91N0.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 91N0.SG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 91N0.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check 91N0.SG's competition here
SNH.DE vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
SNH.DE vs BIKE.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while BIKE.DE trades at €3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs BIKE.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 131.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while BIKE.F trades at €2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -22.92. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check BIKE.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs FSNT.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs ART.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check ART.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs MRX.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while MRX.DE trades at €1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check MRX.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs MRX.F Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while MRX.F trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check MRX.F's competition here
SNH.DE vs BBY.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check BBY.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs ECF.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while ECF.DE trades at €2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check ECF.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs ADD.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check ADD.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs WDL1.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, WDL1.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while WDL1.DE trades at €0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas WDL1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDL1.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to WDL1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check WDL1.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs BTBB.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
SNH.DE vs CEC1.DE Comparison April 2026
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.7M. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at €0.16, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.Check CEC1.DE's competition here