Steinhoff International Holdings N.V.
Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. SNH.DE Peers
See (SNH.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNH.DE | $0.16 | N/A | 670.67M | -0.69 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | $186.70 | +9.36% | 1.98T | 34.45 | $5.42 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | $15.15 | +9.27% | 290.24B | 19.94 | $0.76 | +0.83% |
| AHLA.F | $119.40 | +7.18% | 285.89B | 19.61 | $6.09 | +1.27% |
| IXD1.DE | $47.46 | +2.11% | 147.75B | 25.24 | $1.88 | +2.34% |
| MLB1.DE | $2,235.50 | +2.83% | 113.33B | 67.37 | $33.18 | N/A |
| 013A.F | $32.65 | +7.58% | 38.40B | 9.95 | $3.28 | +2.77% |
| AHLA.DE | $119.60 | +7.17% | 35.98B | 19.64 | $6.09 | +0.10% |
| EBA.DE | $61.39 | -0.68% | 28.29B | 16.73 | $3.67 | +1.69% |
| ZAL.DE | $31.60 | -0.09% | 8.20B | 30.68 | $1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SNH.DE vs AMZ.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 1.98T. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while AMZ.DE trades at $186.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs 2RR.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 290.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while 2RR.F trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs AHLA.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 285.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while AHLA.F trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs IXD1.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 147.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while IXD1.DE trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs MLB1.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 113.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while MLB1.DE trades at $2,235.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 67.37. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs 013A.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 38.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while 013A.F trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs AHLA.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 35.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while AHLA.DE trades at $119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs EBA.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 28.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while EBA.DE trades at $61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs ZAL.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 8.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while ZAL.DE trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs DHER.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 8.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while DHER.DE trades at $27.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs 3E2.BE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while 3E2.BE trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs 3E2.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while 3E2.F trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs 3E2.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while 3E2.DE trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs ZO1.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while ZO1.DE trades at $468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs CEC.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while CEC.DE trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs YOU.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while YOU.DE trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs YOU.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while YOU.F trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs 8WZ.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 813.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while 8WZ.F trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -22.36. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs G5NA.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while G5NA.DE trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs H24.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while H24.DE trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs BIKE.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 106.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while BIKE.DE trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs BIKE.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 104.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while BIKE.F trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs FSNT.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while FSNT.DE trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 81.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs ART.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 53.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while ART.DE trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -67.50. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs MRX.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 48.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while MRX.DE trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs MRX.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 45.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while MRX.F trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs ECF.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 19.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while ECF.DE trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs BBY.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while BBY.DE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs BTBB.DE Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while BTBB.DE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.
SNH.DE vs U1DA.F Comparison
SNH.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNH.DE stands at 670.67M. In comparison, U1DA.F has a market cap of 141750.00. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.DE is priced at $0.16, while U1DA.F trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNH.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas U1DA.F's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SNH.DE's ROE is +0.12%, compared to U1DA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.DE is more volatile compared to U1DA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.DE.