
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See SNA.CN's competitors and their performance on the CNQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for SNA.CN and its CNQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNA.CN | CA$0.03 | +25.00% | 42.2M | -8.33 | -CA$0.00 | N/A |
| GE.TO | CA$44.54 | -0.71% | 485.4B | 41.13 | CA$1.10 | N/A |
| SPCX.TO | CA$22.72 | +1.47% | 172.7B | -207.36 | -CA$0.11 | N/A |
| BBD-B.TO | CA$320.10 | -4.99% | 33.7B | 25.69 | CA$13.30 | N/A |
| BBD-A.TO | CA$320.15 | -4.71% | 33.2B | 24.29 | CA$14.07 | N/A |
| CAE.TO | CA$33.83 | -5.79% | 11.1B | 28.29 | CA$1.22 | N/A |
| BBD-PB.TO | CA$20.01 | -1.33% | 10.1B | 1.84 | CA$10.92 | N/A |
| BBD-PC.TO | CA$25.30 | -1.02% | 6.9B | 2.53 | CA$10.00 | N/A |
| MDA.TO | CA$41.08 | -4.62% | 5.9B | 30.56 | CA$1.39 | N/A |
| MAL.TO | CA$32.46 | -8.43% | 2B | 33.27 | CA$1.04 | +0.58% |
Stock Comparison
General Electric Company (TSX: GE.TO)
SNA.CN vs GE.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, GE.TO has a market cap of 485.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while GE.TO trades at CA$44.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas GE.TO's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to GE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to GE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check GE.TO's competition here
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (TSX: SPCX.TO)
SNA.CN vs SPCX.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, SPCX.TO has a market cap of 172.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while SPCX.TO trades at CA$22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas SPCX.TO's P/E ratio is -207.36. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to SPCX.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to SPCX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check SPCX.TO's competition here
Bombardier Inc. (TSX: BBD-B.TO)
SNA.CN vs BBD-B.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, BBD-B.TO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while BBD-B.TO trades at CA$320.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas BBD-B.TO's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BBD-B.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to BBD-B.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check BBD-B.TO's competition here
Bombardier Inc. (TSX: BBD-A.TO)
SNA.CN vs BBD-A.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, BBD-A.TO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while BBD-A.TO trades at CA$320.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas BBD-A.TO's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BBD-A.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to BBD-A.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check BBD-A.TO's competition here
CAE Inc. (TSX: CAE.TO)
SNA.CN vs CAE.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, CAE.TO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while CAE.TO trades at CA$33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas CAE.TO's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to CAE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to CAE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check CAE.TO's competition here
Bombardier Inc. (TSX: BBD-PB.TO)
SNA.CN vs BBD-PB.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, BBD-PB.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while BBD-PB.TO trades at CA$20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas BBD-PB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BBD-PB.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to BBD-PB.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check BBD-PB.TO's competition here
Bombardier Inc. (TSX: BBD-PC.TO)
SNA.CN vs BBD-PC.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, BBD-PC.TO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while BBD-PC.TO trades at CA$25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas BBD-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to BBD-PC.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to BBD-PC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check BBD-PC.TO's competition here
MDA Ltd. (TSX: MDA.TO)
SNA.CN vs MDA.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, MDA.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while MDA.TO trades at CA$41.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas MDA.TO's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to MDA.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to MDA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check MDA.TO's competition here
Magellan Aerospace Corporation (TSX: MAL.TO)
SNA.CN vs MAL.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, MAL.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while MAL.TO trades at CA$32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas MAL.TO's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to MAL.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to MAL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check MAL.TO's competition here
Héroux-Devtek Inc. (TSX: HRX.TO)
SNA.CN vs HRX.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, HRX.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while HRX.TO trades at CA$32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas HRX.TO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to HRX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to HRX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check HRX.TO's competition here
Firan Technology Group Corporation (TSX: FTG.TO)
SNA.CN vs FTG.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, FTG.TO has a market cap of 548.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while FTG.TO trades at CA$20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas FTG.TO's P/E ratio is 36.51. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to FTG.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to FTG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check FTG.TO's competition here
Volatus Aerospace Inc. (TSX: FLT.TO)
SNA.CN vs FLT.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, FLT.TO has a market cap of 362.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while FLT.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas FLT.TO's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to FLT.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to FLT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check FLT.TO's competition here
Maritime Launch Services Inc. (NEO: MAXQ.NE)
SNA.CN vs MAXQ.NE Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, MAXQ.NE has a market cap of 349.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while MAXQ.NE trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas MAXQ.NE's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to MAXQ.NE's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to MAXQ.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check MAXQ.NE's competition here
Rheinmetall AG (NEO: RHM.NE)
SNA.CN vs RHM.NE Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, RHM.NE has a market cap of 315.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while RHM.NE trades at CA$6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas RHM.NE's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to RHM.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to RHM.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check RHM.NE's competition here
Draganfly Inc. (CNQ: DPRO.CN)
SNA.CN vs DPRO.CN Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, DPRO.CN has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while DPRO.CN trades at CA$5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas DPRO.CN's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to DPRO.CN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to DPRO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check DPRO.CN's competition here
Avcorp Industries Inc. (TSX: AVP.TO)
SNA.CN vs AVP.TO Comparison August 2026
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. (CNQ: SNA.CN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SNA.CN stands at 42.2M. In comparison, AVP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNA.CN is priced at CA$0.03 on the CNQ, while AVP.TO trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SNA.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.33, whereas AVP.TO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, SNA.CN's ROE is +0.90%, compared to AVP.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNA.CN is more volatile compared to AVP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNA.CN.Check AVP.TO's competition here