Samsonite International S.A.
Samsonite International S.A. SMSEY Peers
See (SMSEY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMSEY | $8.99 | -6.74% | 2.55B | 7.62 | $1.18 | +5.77% |
| ADDYY | $124.90 | -0.25% | 44.60B | 38.79 | $3.22 | +0.33% |
| ADDDF | $240.90 | -3.72% | 43.01B | 37.47 | $6.43 | +0.32% |
| ASCCY | $24.69 | +4.22% | 17.60B | 41.15 | $0.60 | +0.84% |
| ASCCF | $20.48 | N/A | 14.15B | 33.57 | $0.61 | +0.61% |
| BCUCF | $117.00 | +9.35% | 7.95B | 58.79 | $1.99 | +0.85% |
| PUMSY | $2.55 | -4.49% | 3.84B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.48% |
| PMMAF | $25.55 | -1.75% | 3.80B | 11.94 | $2.14 | +3.48% |
| YUEIF | $1.65 | -16.24% | 2.65B | 6.88 | $0.24 | +8.53% |
| SMSOF | $1.80 | -23.73% | 2.51B | 7.50 | $0.24 | +5.78% |
Stock Comparison
SMSEY vs ADDYY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, ADDYY has a market cap of 44.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while ADDYY trades at $124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ADDYY's P/E ratio is 38.79. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADDYY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to ADDYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs ADDDF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, ADDDF has a market cap of 43.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while ADDDF trades at $240.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ADDDF's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADDDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to ADDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs ASCCY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, ASCCY has a market cap of 17.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while ASCCY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ASCCY's P/E ratio is 41.15. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASCCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to ASCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs ASCCF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, ASCCF has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while ASCCF trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ASCCF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASCCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to ASCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs BCUCF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while BCUCF trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs PUMSY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, PUMSY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while PUMSY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PUMSY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PUMSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to PUMSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs PMMAF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, PMMAF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while PMMAF trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PMMAF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMMAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to PMMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs YUEIF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, YUEIF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while YUEIF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YUEIF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YUEIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to YUEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs SMSOF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, SMSOF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while SMSOF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SMSOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMSOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to SMSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs YUEIY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, YUEIY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while YUEIY trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas YUEIY's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YUEIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to YUEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs HUGPF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, HUGPF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while HUGPF trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas HUGPF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUGPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to HUGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs SLNLY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, SLNLY has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while SLNLY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SLNLY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SLNLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to SLNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs TODGF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, TODGF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while TODGF trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TODGF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TODGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to TODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs FXWZF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, FXWZF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while FXWZF trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas FXWZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FXWZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to FXWZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs TSIOF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, TSIOF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while TSIOF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TSIOF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to TSIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs DOCMF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, DOCMF has a market cap of 751.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while DOCMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DOCMF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DOCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to DOCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs DRMTY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, DRMTY has a market cap of 694.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while DRMTY trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DRMTY's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRMTY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to DRMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs GXSBY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, GXSBY has a market cap of 183.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while GXSBY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GXSBY's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GXSBY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to GXSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs GXSBF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, GXSBF has a market cap of 155.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while GXSBF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GXSBF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GXSBF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to GXSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs TDPAY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, TDPAY has a market cap of 151.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while TDPAY trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TDPAY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDPAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to TDPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs MCRAB Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, MCRAB has a market cap of 109.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while MCRAB trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MCRAB's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCRAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to MCRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs MCRAA Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, MCRAA has a market cap of 108.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while MCRAA trades at $46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas MCRAA's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MCRAA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to MCRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs DPNEY Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, DPNEY has a market cap of 92.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while DPNEY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DPNEY's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DPNEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to DPNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs DPNEF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, DPNEF has a market cap of 39.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while DPNEF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas DPNEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DPNEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to DPNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs KMSWF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, KMSWF has a market cap of 33.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while KMSWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas KMSWF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMSWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to KMSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs BSHI Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, BSHI has a market cap of 31.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while BSHI trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas BSHI's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSHI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to BSHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs GVSI Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, GVSI has a market cap of 12.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while GVSI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas GVSI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GVSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to GVSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs TIEMF Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, TIEMF has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while TIEMF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas TIEMF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIEMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to TIEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs CHSH Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, CHSH has a market cap of 1.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while CHSH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas CHSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHSH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to CHSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs RBNW Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, RBNW has a market cap of 939165.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while RBNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas RBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RBNW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to RBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs SAML Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, SAML has a market cap of 427462.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while SAML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas SAML's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAML's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to SAML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs ATYM Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, ATYM has a market cap of 265707.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while ATYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas ATYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATYM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is less volatile compared to ATYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs PXFG Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, PXFG has a market cap of 81780.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while PXFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas PXFG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PXFG's ROE of -5.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to PXFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.
SMSEY vs QING Comparison
SMSEY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMSEY stands at 2.55B. In comparison, QING has a market cap of 1212.00. Regarding current trading prices, SMSEY is priced at $8.99, while QING trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMSEY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.62, whereas QING's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SMSEY's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QING's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMSEY is more volatile compared to QING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMSEY.