Sarthak Metals Limited
Sarthak Metals Limited (SMLT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMLT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMLT.BO | ₹62.55 | -5.03% | 869.4M | 22.93 | ₹2.77 | +0.78% |
| PTCIL.BO | ₹14,947.55 | -8.96% | 234.1B | 352.22 | ₹44.33 | N/A |
| PTCIL.NS | ₹14,964.00 | -8.99% | 233.9B | 351.40 | ₹44.40 | N/A |
| SANSERA.NS | ₹2,136.10 | -2.15% | 134.4B | 50.98 | ₹42.35 | +0.15% |
| SANSERA.BO | ₹2,152.35 | -1.36% | 134.3B | 51.00 | ₹42.33 | +0.15% |
| HAPPYFORGE.NS | ₹1,158.00 | -4.84% | 111.2B | 38.91 | ₹30.30 | +0.25% |
| GRAVITA.NS | ₹1,363.00 | -3.84% | 102.2B | 26.60 | ₹52.73 | +0.82% |
| GRAVITA.BO | ₹1,374.35 | -3.30% | 101.9B | 26.53 | ₹52.73 | +0.82% |
| KIRLFER.NS | ₹460.05 | +1.74% | 76.6B | 18.57 | ₹24.78 | +1.50% |
| RHIM.NS | ₹325.80 | -7.48% | 69B | 40.20 | ₹8.31 | +0.75% |
Stock Comparison
SMLT.BO vs PTCIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, PTCIL.BO has a market cap of 234.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while PTCIL.BO trades at ₹14,947.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PTCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 352.22. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTCIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to PTCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check PTCIL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs PTCIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, PTCIL.NS has a market cap of 233.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while PTCIL.NS trades at ₹14,964.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PTCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 351.40. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTCIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to PTCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check PTCIL.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SANSERA.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SANSERA.NS has a market cap of 134.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SANSERA.NS trades at ₹2,136.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SANSERA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.98. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANSERA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SANSERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SANSERA.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SANSERA.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SANSERA.BO has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SANSERA.BO trades at ₹2,152.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SANSERA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANSERA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SANSERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SANSERA.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs HAPPYFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, HAPPYFORGE.NS has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while HAPPYFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HAPPYFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to HAPPYFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check HAPPYFORGE.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GRAVITA.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GRAVITA.NS has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GRAVITA.NS trades at ₹1,363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GRAVITA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRAVITA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to GRAVITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GRAVITA.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GRAVITA.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GRAVITA.BO has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GRAVITA.BO trades at ₹1,374.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GRAVITA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRAVITA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to GRAVITA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GRAVITA.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs KIRLFER.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, KIRLFER.NS has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while KIRLFER.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KIRLFER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KIRLFER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check KIRLFER.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs RHIM.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, RHIM.NS has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while RHIM.NS trades at ₹325.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas RHIM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHIM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to RHIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check RHIM.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs RHIM.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, RHIM.BO has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while RHIM.BO trades at ₹329.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas RHIM.BO's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHIM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to RHIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check RHIM.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs KIRLFER.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, KIRLFER.BO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while KIRLFER.BO trades at ₹358.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KIRLFER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KIRLFER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLFER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check KIRLFER.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs BALUFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.NS has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while BALUFORGE.NS trades at ₹396.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BALUFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BALUFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check BALUFORGE.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AEROFLEX.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AEROFLEX.NS trades at ₹237.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AEROFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 63.31. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEROFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to AEROFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AEROFLEX.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AEROFLEX.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AEROFLEX.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AEROFLEX.BO trades at ₹240.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AEROFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEROFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to AEROFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AEROFLEX.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SUNCLAY.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SUNCLAY.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SUNCLAY.NS trades at ₹1,240.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SUNCLAY.NS's P/E ratio is -134.09. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUNCLAY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SUNCLAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SUNCLAY.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs KIRLOSIND.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while KIRLOSIND.BO trades at ₹2,554.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KIRLOSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KIRLOSIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check KIRLOSIND.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs KIRLOSIND.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, KIRLOSIND.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while KIRLOSIND.NS trades at ₹2,498.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KIRLOSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KIRLOSIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check KIRLOSIND.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹705.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹711.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SHBCLQ.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SHBCLQ.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SHBCLQ.BO trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SHBCLQ.BO's P/E ratio is 193.16. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHBCLQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SHBCLQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SHBCLQ.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SBCL.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SBCL.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SBCL.NS trades at ₹395.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SBCL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SBCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SBCL.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SBCL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SBCL.BO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SBCL.BO trades at ₹395.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SBCL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBCL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SBCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SBCL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MMFL.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MMFL.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MMFL.NS trades at ₹388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MMFL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MMFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MMFL.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs DEEDEV.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, DEEDEV.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while DEEDEV.NS trades at ₹273.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DEEDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEEDEV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to DEEDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check DEEDEV.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MMFL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MMFL.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MMFL.BO trades at ₹393.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MMFL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to MMFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MMFL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs FRONTSP.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, FRONTSP.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while FRONTSP.BO trades at ₹1,265.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas FRONTSP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRONTSP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to FRONTSP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check FRONTSP.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AMIC.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AMIC.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AMIC.BO trades at ₹1,255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 78.25. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMIC.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to AMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AMIC.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MANAKCOAT.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MANAKCOAT.NS trades at ₹98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MANAKCOAT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANAKCOAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MANAKCOAT.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MANAKCOAT.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MANAKCOAT.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MANAKCOAT.BO trades at ₹99.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MANAKCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANAKCOAT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MANAKCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MANAKCOAT.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs NELCAST.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, NELCAST.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while NELCAST.BO trades at ₹117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NELCAST.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to NELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check NELCAST.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs NELCAST.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, NELCAST.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while NELCAST.NS trades at ₹118.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NELCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NELCAST.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to NELCAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check NELCAST.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ALICON.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ALICON.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ALICON.BO trades at ₹600.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ALICON.BO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALICON.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to ALICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ALICON.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ALICON.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ALICON.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ALICON.NS trades at ₹602.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ALICON.NS's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALICON.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to ALICON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ALICON.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GANDHITUBE.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GANDHITUBE.BO trades at ₹780.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GANDHITUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GANDHITUBE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GANDHITUBE.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GANDHITUBE.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GANDHITUBE.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GANDHITUBE.NS trades at ₹776.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GANDHITUBE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GANDHITUBE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to GANDHITUBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GANDHITUBE.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs RAJGLOWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, RAJGLOWIR.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while RAJGLOWIR.BO trades at ₹786.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas RAJGLOWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to RAJGLOWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check RAJGLOWIR.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SGIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SGIL.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SGIL.NS trades at ₹482.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 92.18. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SGIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SGIL.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SGIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SGIL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SGIL.BO trades at ₹486.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.82. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SGIL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs TEMBO.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, TEMBO.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while TEMBO.NS trades at ₹459.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas TEMBO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEMBO.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to TEMBO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check TEMBO.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ELECTHERM.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ELECTHERM.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ELECTHERM.NS trades at ₹574.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ELECTHERM.NS's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELECTHERM.NS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to ELECTHERM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ELECTHERM.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs PRADPME.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, PRADPME.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while PRADPME.BO trades at ₹366.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PRADPME.BO's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRADPME.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to PRADPME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check PRADPME.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs UNIABEXAL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, UNIABEXAL.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while UNIABEXAL.BO trades at ₹2,699.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas UNIABEXAL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNIABEXAL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to UNIABEXAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check UNIABEXAL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs INVPRECQ.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, INVPRECQ.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while INVPRECQ.BO trades at ₹499.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas INVPRECQ.BO's P/E ratio is 51.59. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INVPRECQ.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to INVPRECQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check INVPRECQ.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs TIRUPATIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, TIRUPATIFL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while TIRUPATIFL.NS trades at ₹39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas TIRUPATIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to TIRUPATIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check TIRUPATIFL.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs CTCL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, CTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while CTCL.BO trades at ₹170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to CTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check CTCL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SIMPLEXCAS.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SIMPLEXCAS.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SIMPLEXCAS.BO trades at ₹510.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SIMPLEXCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXCAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SIMPLEXCAS.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MAGNAELQ.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MAGNAELQ.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MAGNAELQ.BO trades at ₹919.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MAGNAELQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAGNAELQ.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MAGNAELQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MAGNAELQ.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SYNTHFO.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SYNTHFO.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SYNTHFO.BO trades at ₹1,706.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SYNTHFO.BO's P/E ratio is -2882.35. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYNTHFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SYNTHFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SYNTHFO.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ROLEXRINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ROLEXRINGS.BO trades at ₹113.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ROLEXRINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ROLEXRINGS.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ROLEXRINGS.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ROLEXRINGS.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ROLEXRINGS.NS trades at ₹113.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ROLEXRINGS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to ROLEXRINGS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ROLEXRINGS.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MANAKSIA.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MANAKSIA.BO trades at ₹43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MANAKSIA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANAKSIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MANAKSIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MANAKSIA.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MANAKSIA.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MANAKSIA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MANAKSIA.NS trades at ₹43.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MANAKSIA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANAKSIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MANAKSIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MANAKSIA.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs LGBFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while LGBFORGE.NS trades at ₹11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LGBFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -49.75. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGBFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check LGBFORGE.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SKP.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SKP.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SKP.NS trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SKP.NS's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SKP.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to SKP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SKP.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs KRISHCA.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, KRISHCA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while KRISHCA.NS trades at ₹147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KRISHCA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KRISHCA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to KRISHCA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check KRISHCA.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs DPWIRES.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, DPWIRES.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while DPWIRES.BO trades at ₹130.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DPWIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DPWIRES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to DPWIRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check DPWIRES.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs DPWIRES.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, DPWIRES.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while DPWIRES.NS trades at ₹130.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DPWIRES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DPWIRES.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to DPWIRES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check DPWIRES.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs JAINAM.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, JAINAM.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while JAINAM.NS trades at ₹173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas JAINAM.NS's P/E ratio is -88.72. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JAINAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to JAINAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check JAINAM.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MNKCMILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MNKCMILTD.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MNKCMILTD.BO trades at ₹29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MNKCMILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 125.80. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNKCMILTD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to MNKCMILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MNKCMILTD.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ALPHAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ALPHAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ALPHAIND.BO trades at ₹182.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ALPHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.81. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALPHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to ALPHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ALPHAIND.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GALXBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GALXBRG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GALXBRG.BO trades at ₹451.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GALXBRG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GALXBRG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to GALXBRG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GALXBRG.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SIMMOND.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SIMMOND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SIMMOND.BO trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SIMMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIMMOND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to SIMMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SIMMOND.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs NATFIT.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, NATFIT.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while NATFIT.BO trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NATFIT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NATFIT.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to NATFIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check NATFIT.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs LGBFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, LGBFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while LGBFORGE.BO trades at ₹5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LGBFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGBFORGE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to LGBFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check LGBFORGE.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AEL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AEL.BO trades at ₹104.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AEL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to AEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AEL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs KVFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, KVFORGE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while KVFORGE.BO trades at ₹120.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KVFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KVFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to KVFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check KVFORGE.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs COSMOFE.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, COSMOFE.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while COSMOFE.BO trades at ₹95.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas COSMOFE.BO's P/E ratio is -32.94. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COSMOFE.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to COSMOFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check COSMOFE.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs DCM.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, DCM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while DCM.BO trades at ₹58.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DCM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DCM.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to DCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check DCM.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs DCM.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, DCM.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while DCM.NS trades at ₹58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DCM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DCM.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to DCM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check DCM.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs MUL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, MUL.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while MUL.BO trades at ₹7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MUL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MUL.BO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to MUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check MUL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AUTOPINS.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AUTOPINS.BO has a market cap of 945.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AUTOPINS.BO trades at ₹165.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AUTOPINS.BO's P/E ratio is 247.39. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUTOPINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to AUTOPINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AUTOPINS.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SMLT.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SMLT.NS has a market cap of 872.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SMLT.NS trades at ₹62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SMLT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMLT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SMLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SMLT.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs RAPICUT.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, RAPICUT.BO has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while RAPICUT.BO trades at ₹150.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas RAPICUT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAPICUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to RAPICUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check RAPICUT.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs PATTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, PATTECH.NS has a market cap of 736.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while PATTECH.NS trades at ₹95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PATTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 74.22. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PATTECH.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to PATTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check PATTECH.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs DECANBRG.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, DECANBRG.BO has a market cap of 653.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while DECANBRG.BO trades at ₹299.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DECANBRG.BO's P/E ratio is -325.60. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DECANBRG.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to DECANBRG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check DECANBRG.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs HILTON.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, HILTON.BO has a market cap of 466.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while HILTON.BO trades at ₹23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HILTON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HILTON.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to HILTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check HILTON.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs HILTON.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, HILTON.NS has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while HILTON.NS trades at ₹23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HILTON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HILTON.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to HILTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check HILTON.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs VISHALBL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, VISHALBL.BO has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while VISHALBL.BO trades at ₹42.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VISHALBL.BO's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VISHALBL.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to VISHALBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check VISHALBL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SMFIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SMFIL.BO has a market cap of 405.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SMFIL.BO trades at ₹3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SMFIL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.86. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMFIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SMFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SMFIL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AUSTENG.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AUSTENG.BO has a market cap of 364.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AUSTENG.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AUSTENG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUSTENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to AUSTENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AUSTENG.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GANGAFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GANGAFORGE.NS has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GANGAFORGE.NS trades at ₹2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GANGAFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GANGAFORGE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to GANGAFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GANGAFORGE.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs RELICAB.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, RELICAB.BO has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while RELICAB.BO trades at ₹34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas RELICAB.BO's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RELICAB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to RELICAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check RELICAB.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs CARNATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, CARNATIN.BO has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while CARNATIN.BO trades at ₹80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CARNATIN.BO's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CARNATIN.BO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to CARNATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check CARNATIN.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ARCOTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ARCOTECH.NS has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ARCOTECH.NS trades at ₹2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ARCOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARCOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to ARCOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ARCOTECH.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs BOMBWIR.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, BOMBWIR.BO has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while BOMBWIR.BO trades at ₹44.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BOMBWIR.BO's P/E ratio is -25.54. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOMBWIR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to BOMBWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check BOMBWIR.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SHREMETAL.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SHREMETAL.BO has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SHREMETAL.BO trades at ₹40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SHREMETAL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHREMETAL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SHREMETAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SHREMETAL.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs METALFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, METALFORGE.NS has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while METALFORGE.NS trades at ₹4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas METALFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to METALFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to METALFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check METALFORGE.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs BILENERGY.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, BILENERGY.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while BILENERGY.NS trades at ₹0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BILENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BILENERGY.NS's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to BILENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check BILENERGY.NS's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GALAGEX.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GALAGEX.BO has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GALAGEX.BO trades at ₹41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GALAGEX.BO's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GALAGEX.BO's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to GALAGEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GALAGEX.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs SHIVAGR.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, SHIVAGR.BO has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while SHIVAGR.BO trades at ₹20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SHIVAGR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIVAGR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVAGR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check SHIVAGR.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AMFORG.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AMFORG.BO has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AMFORG.BO trades at ₹6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AMFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMFORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to AMFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AMFORG.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs AANCHALISP.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, AANCHALISP.BO has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while AANCHALISP.BO trades at ₹24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AANCHALISP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AANCHALISP.BO's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is more volatile compared to AANCHALISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check AANCHALISP.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs GOLKONDA.BO Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, GOLKONDA.BO has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while GOLKONDA.BO trades at ₹6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GOLKONDA.BO's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOLKONDA.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to GOLKONDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check GOLKONDA.BO's competition here
SMLT.BO vs ROHITFERRO.NS Comparison April 2026
SMLT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMLT.BO stands at 869.4M. In comparison, ROHITFERRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMLT.BO is priced at ₹62.55, while ROHITFERRO.NS trades at ₹28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMLT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ROHITFERRO.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, SMLT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROHITFERRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMLT.BO is less volatile compared to ROHITFERRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMLT.BO.Check ROHITFERRO.NS's competition here