SMC Global Securities Limited
SMC Global Securities Limited (SMCGLOBAL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMCGLOBAL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMCGLOBAL.BO | ₹78.82 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 19.60 | ₹4.04 | +1.52% |
| MOTILALOFS.NS | ₹738.50 | -0.63% | 440.8B | 22.34 | ₹32.82 | +0.82% |
| MOTILALOFS.BO | ₹743.50 | +0.00% | 440.8B | 22.30 | ₹32.88 | +0.82% |
| AIIL.NS | ₹490.30 | -1.28% | 418.4B | 11.51 | ₹42.81 | +0.30% |
| ISEC.BO | ₹897.45 | +0.20% | 291.8B | 13.96 | ₹64.31 | N/A |
| ISEC.NS | ₹892.25 | -0.44% | 290.1B | 13.87 | ₹64.35 | N/A |
| CDSL.NS | ₹1,308.10 | -1.26% | 277.3B | 58.22 | ₹22.79 | +0.94% |
| ANGELONE.BO | ₹2,461.60 | -0.00% | 226.5B | 30.41 | ₹81.93 | +2.41% |
| ANGELONE.NS | ₹2,460.20 | +0.00% | 226.3B | 30.41 | ₹81.88 | +2.41% |
| CHOICEIN.NS | ₹753.00 | -1.01% | 168.1B | 69.81 | ₹10.81 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs MOTILALOFS.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MOTILALOFS.NS has a market cap of 440.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while MOTILALOFS.NS trades at ₹738.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas MOTILALOFS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOTILALOFS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to MOTILALOFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check MOTILALOFS.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs MOTILALOFS.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MOTILALOFS.BO has a market cap of 440.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while MOTILALOFS.BO trades at ₹743.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas MOTILALOFS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOTILALOFS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MOTILALOFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check MOTILALOFS.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AIIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AIIL.NS has a market cap of 418.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AIIL.NS trades at ₹490.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to AIIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AIIL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ISEC.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ISEC.BO has a market cap of 291.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ISEC.BO trades at ₹897.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ISEC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISEC.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ISEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ISEC.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ISEC.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ISEC.NS has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ISEC.NS trades at ₹892.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ISEC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ISEC.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ISEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ISEC.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs CDSL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CDSL.NS has a market cap of 277.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while CDSL.NS trades at ₹1,308.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas CDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 58.22. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDSL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to CDSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check CDSL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ANGELONE.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ANGELONE.BO has a market cap of 226.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ANGELONE.BO trades at ₹2,461.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ANGELONE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGELONE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ANGELONE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ANGELONE.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ANGELONE.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ANGELONE.NS has a market cap of 226.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ANGELONE.NS trades at ₹2,460.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ANGELONE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGELONE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ANGELONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ANGELONE.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs CHOICEIN.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CHOICEIN.NS has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while CHOICEIN.NS trades at ₹753.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas CHOICEIN.NS's P/E ratio is 69.81. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOICEIN.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOICEIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check CHOICEIN.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs CHOICEIN.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CHOICEIN.BO has a market cap of 168B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while CHOICEIN.BO trades at ₹761.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas CHOICEIN.BO's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHOICEIN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOICEIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check CHOICEIN.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs JMFINANCIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.NS has a market cap of 127.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while JMFINANCIL.NS trades at ₹133.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas JMFINANCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMFINANCIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check JMFINANCIL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs JMFINANCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.BO has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while JMFINANCIL.BO trades at ₹133.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas JMFINANCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JMFINANCIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check JMFINANCIL.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs IEX.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IEX.NS has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while IEX.NS trades at ₹130.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas IEX.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IEX.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to IEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check IEX.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs IEX.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IEX.BO has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while IEX.BO trades at ₹125.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas IEX.BO's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IEX.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to IEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check IEX.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs EDELWEISS.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EDELWEISS.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while EDELWEISS.BO trades at ₹121.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas EDELWEISS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDELWEISS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to EDELWEISS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check EDELWEISS.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs EDELWEISS.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EDELWEISS.NS has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while EDELWEISS.NS trades at ₹118.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas EDELWEISS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EDELWEISS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to EDELWEISS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check EDELWEISS.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs IIFLCAPS.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.NS has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while IIFLCAPS.NS trades at ₹297.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas IIFLCAPS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFLCAPS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check IIFLCAPS.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs IIFLCAPS.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.BO has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while IIFLCAPS.BO trades at ₹300.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas IIFLCAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFLCAPS.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check IIFLCAPS.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs IIFLSEC.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IIFLSEC.NS has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while IIFLSEC.NS trades at ₹231.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas IIFLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check IIFLSEC.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs IIFLSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IIFLSEC.BO has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while IIFLSEC.BO trades at ₹230.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas IIFLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IIFLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to IIFLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check IIFLSEC.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs RELIGARE.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RELIGARE.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while RELIGARE.NS trades at ₹208.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas RELIGARE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RELIGARE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to RELIGARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check RELIGARE.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs TATAINVEST.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while TATAINVEST.BO trades at ₹666.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas TATAINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 82.01. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TATAINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TATAINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check TATAINVEST.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs TATAINVEST.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while TATAINVEST.NS trades at ₹657.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas TATAINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 81.86. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TATAINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check TATAINVEST.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs INDOTHAI.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INDOTHAI.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while INDOTHAI.NS trades at ₹264.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas INDOTHAI.NS's P/E ratio is 89.95. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOTHAI.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOTHAI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check INDOTHAI.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs INDOTHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INDOTHAI.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while INDOTHAI.BO trades at ₹252.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas INDOTHAI.BO's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOTHAI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTHAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check INDOTHAI.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DHANI.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DHANI.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DHANI.NS trades at ₹51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 86.54. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHANI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DHANI.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SHAREINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SHAREINDIA.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SHAREINDIA.BO trades at ₹133.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SHAREINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHAREINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SHAREINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SHAREINDIA.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SHAREINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SHAREINDIA.NS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SHAREINDIA.NS trades at ₹132.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SHAREINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHAREINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SHAREINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SHAREINDIA.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs MONARCH.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MONARCH.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while MONARCH.NS trades at ₹280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas MONARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MONARCH.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to MONARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check MONARCH.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs MONARCH.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MONARCH.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while MONARCH.BO trades at ₹276.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas MONARCH.BO's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MONARCH.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MONARCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check MONARCH.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹395.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SUMMITSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SUMMITSEC.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SUMMITSEC.BO trades at ₹1,686.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SUMMITSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMMITSEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SUMMITSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SUMMITSEC.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SUMMITSEC.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SUMMITSEC.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SUMMITSEC.NS trades at ₹1,707.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SUMMITSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMMITSEC.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMMITSEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SUMMITSEC.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs GEOJITFSL.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GEOJITFSL.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while GEOJITFSL.BO trades at ₹65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas GEOJITFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEOJITFSL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to GEOJITFSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check GEOJITFSL.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs GEOJITFSL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GEOJITFSL.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while GEOJITFSL.NS trades at ₹64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas GEOJITFSL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GEOJITFSL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to GEOJITFSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check GEOJITFSL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ALGOQUANT.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ALGOQUANT.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ALGOQUANT.BO trades at ₹59.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ALGOQUANT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGOQUANT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ALGOQUANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ALGOQUANT.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs PNBGILTS.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PNBGILTS.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while PNBGILTS.NS trades at ₹78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas PNBGILTS.NS's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNBGILTS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to PNBGILTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check PNBGILTS.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs PNBGILTS.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PNBGILTS.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while PNBGILTS.BO trades at ₹77.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas PNBGILTS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNBGILTS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to PNBGILTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check PNBGILTS.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DOLATALGO.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DOLATALGO.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DOLATALGO.NS trades at ₹76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DOLATALGO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLATALGO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to DOLATALGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DOLATALGO.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DOLATALGO.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DOLATALGO.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DOLATALGO.BO trades at ₹75.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DOLATALGO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLATALGO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DOLATALGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DOLATALGO.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs MASTERTR.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MASTERTR.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while MASTERTR.NS trades at ₹87.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas MASTERTR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MASTERTR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to MASTERTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check MASTERTR.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DAMCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DAMCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DAMCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DAMCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAMCAPITAL.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to DAMCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DAMCAPITAL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs WEALTH.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WEALTH.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while WEALTH.NS trades at ₹979.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas WEALTH.NS's P/E ratio is 43.76. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEALTH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to WEALTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check WEALTH.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SYSTMTXC.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SYSTMTXC.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SYSTMTXC.NS trades at ₹75.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SYSTMTXC.NS's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYSTMTXC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SYSTMTXC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SYSTMTXC.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AFSL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AFSL.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AFSL.NS trades at ₹202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AFSL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to AFSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AFSL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AFSL.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AFSL.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AFSL.BO trades at ₹201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFSL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to AFSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AFSL.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs 5PAISA.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, 5PAISA.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while 5PAISA.NS trades at ₹325.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas 5PAISA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5PAISA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to 5PAISA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check 5PAISA.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs 5PAISA.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, 5PAISA.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while 5PAISA.BO trades at ₹326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas 5PAISA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5PAISA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to 5PAISA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check 5PAISA.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs PRIMESECU.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PRIMESECU.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while PRIMESECU.NS trades at ₹280.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas PRIMESECU.NS's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRIMESECU.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to PRIMESECU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check PRIMESECU.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs PRIMESECU.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PRIMESECU.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while PRIMESECU.BO trades at ₹272.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas PRIMESECU.BO's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRIMESECU.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to PRIMESECU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check PRIMESECU.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AHL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AHL.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AHL.NS trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AHL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to AHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AHL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AHL.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AHL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AHL.BO trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AHL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to AHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AHL.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DVL.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DVL.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DVL.BO trades at ₹253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DVL.BO's P/E ratio is -58.25. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DVL.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DVL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DVL.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DVL.NS trades at ₹250.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DVL.NS's P/E ratio is -58.21. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DVL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to DVL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DVL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ARIHANTCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ARIHANTCAP.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ARIHANTCAP.BO trades at ₹84.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ARIHANTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIHANTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ARIHANTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ARIHANTCAP.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ARIHANTCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ARIHANTCAP.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ARIHANTCAP.NS trades at ₹80.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ARIHANTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIHANTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ARIHANTCAP.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SMCGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SMCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SMCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹79.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SMCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SMCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SMCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs VLSFINANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VLSFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while VLSFINANCE.BO trades at ₹258.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas VLSFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is -46.12. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLSFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to VLSFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check VLSFINANCE.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs VLSFINANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VLSFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while VLSFINANCE.NS trades at ₹258.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas VLSFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is -45.78. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLSFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to VLSFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check VLSFINANCE.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs GCSL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GCSL.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while GCSL.NS trades at ₹349.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas GCSL.NS's P/E ratio is -59.73. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCSL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to GCSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check GCSL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs CONSOFINVT.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CONSOFINVT.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while CONSOFINVT.NS trades at ₹245.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas CONSOFINVT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to CONSOFINVT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check CONSOFINVT.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs BIRLAMONEY.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BIRLAMONEY.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while BIRLAMONEY.NS trades at ₹133.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas BIRLAMONEY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIRLAMONEY.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to BIRLAMONEY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check BIRLAMONEY.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs BIRLAMONEY.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BIRLAMONEY.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while BIRLAMONEY.BO trades at ₹135.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas BIRLAMONEY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIRLAMONEY.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to BIRLAMONEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check BIRLAMONEY.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs EMKAY.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EMKAY.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while EMKAY.NS trades at ₹237.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas EMKAY.NS's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMKAY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to EMKAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check EMKAY.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DHUNINV.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DHUNINV.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DHUNINV.BO trades at ₹962.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DHUNINV.BO's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHUNINV.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DHUNINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DHUNINV.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs EMKAY.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EMKAY.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while EMKAY.BO trades at ₹232.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas EMKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMKAY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to EMKAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check EMKAY.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DHUNINV.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DHUNINV.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DHUNINV.NS trades at ₹986.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DHUNINV.NS's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHUNINV.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DHUNINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DHUNINV.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs THEINVEST.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, THEINVEST.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while THEINVEST.BO trades at ₹99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas THEINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THEINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to THEINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check THEINVEST.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs THEINVEST.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, THEINVEST.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while THEINVEST.NS trades at ₹98.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas THEINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THEINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to THEINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check THEINVEST.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs NBIFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NBIFIN.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while NBIFIN.NS trades at ₹1,871.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas NBIFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NBIFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to NBIFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check NBIFIN.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs WELINV.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WELINV.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while WELINV.BO trades at ₹1,242.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas WELINV.BO's P/E ratio is 144.25. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELINV.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to WELINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check WELINV.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs WELINV.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WELINV.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while WELINV.NS trades at ₹1,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas WELINV.NS's P/E ratio is 144.16. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELINV.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to WELINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check WELINV.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AVONMORE.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AVONMORE.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AVONMORE.BO trades at ₹14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AVONMORE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVONMORE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to AVONMORE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AVONMORE.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AVONMORE.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AVONMORE.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AVONMORE.NS trades at ₹15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AVONMORE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVONMORE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to AVONMORE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AVONMORE.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs NAHARCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NAHARCAP.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while NAHARCAP.NS trades at ₹247.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas NAHARCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAHARCAP.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check NAHARCAP.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs NAHARCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NAHARCAP.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while NAHARCAP.BO trades at ₹235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas NAHARCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAHARCAP.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check NAHARCAP.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SPCENET.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SPCENET.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SPCENET.NS trades at ₹5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SPCENET.NS's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPCENET.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SPCENET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SPCENET.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ALMONDZ.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ALMONDZ.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ALMONDZ.BO trades at ₹16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ALMONDZ.BO's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMONDZ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ALMONDZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ALMONDZ.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs ALMONDZ.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ALMONDZ.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while ALMONDZ.NS trades at ₹15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas ALMONDZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMONDZ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ALMONDZ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check ALMONDZ.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs NDGL.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NDGL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while NDGL.NS trades at ₹2,587.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas NDGL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NDGL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to NDGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check NDGL.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DELPHIFX.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DELPHIFX.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DELPHIFX.BO trades at ₹13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DELPHIFX.BO's P/E ratio is 95.36. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DELPHIFX.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DELPHIFX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DELPHIFX.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs KEYFINSERV.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while KEYFINSERV.NS trades at ₹288.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas KEYFINSERV.NS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEYFINSERV.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check KEYFINSERV.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs INDBANK.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INDBANK.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while INDBANK.BO trades at ₹35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas INDBANK.BO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDBANK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to INDBANK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check INDBANK.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs KEYFINSERV.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while KEYFINSERV.BO trades at ₹281.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas KEYFINSERV.BO's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEYFINSERV.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check KEYFINSERV.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs INDBANK.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INDBANK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while INDBANK.NS trades at ₹35.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas INDBANK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDBANK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to INDBANK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check INDBANK.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AUSOMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AUSOMENT.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AUSOMENT.NS trades at ₹97.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AUSOMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUSOMENT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to AUSOMENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AUSOMENT.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs AUSOMENT.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AUSOMENT.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while AUSOMENT.BO trades at ₹98.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas AUSOMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUSOMENT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to AUSOMENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check AUSOMENT.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs STEELCITY.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, STEELCITY.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while STEELCITY.NS trades at ₹87.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas STEELCITY.NS's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STEELCITY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to STEELCITY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check STEELCITY.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs STAMPEDE.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, STAMPEDE.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while STAMPEDE.NS trades at ₹1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas STAMPEDE.NS's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STAMPEDE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to STAMPEDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check STAMPEDE.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs INVENTURE.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INVENTURE.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while INVENTURE.BO trades at ₹1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas INVENTURE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INVENTURE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to INVENTURE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check INVENTURE.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs INVENTURE.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INVENTURE.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while INVENTURE.NS trades at ₹1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas INVENTURE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INVENTURE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to INVENTURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check INVENTURE.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs JAGSONSER.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, JAGSONSER.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while JAGSONSER.BO trades at ₹58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas JAGSONSER.BO's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JAGSONSER.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to JAGSONSER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check JAGSONSER.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs MCDHOLDING.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MCDHOLDING.NS has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while MCDHOLDING.NS trades at ₹68.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas MCDHOLDING.NS's P/E ratio is -33.70. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCDHOLDING.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MCDHOLDING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check MCDHOLDING.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs TTGIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TTGIL.BO has a market cap of 940.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while TTGIL.BO trades at ₹7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas TTGIL.BO's P/E ratio is -54.60. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTGIL.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TTGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check TTGIL.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs BLBLIMITED.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BLBLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while BLBLIMITED.BO trades at ₹18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas BLBLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLBLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to BLBLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check BLBLIMITED.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs BLBLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BLBLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 935.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while BLBLIMITED.NS trades at ₹17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas BLBLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLBLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to BLBLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check BLBLIMITED.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DBSTOCKBRO.BO Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DBSTOCKBRO.BO has a market cap of 899.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DBSTOCKBRO.BO trades at ₹25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DBSTOCKBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBSTOCKBRO.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to DBSTOCKBRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DBSTOCKBRO.BO's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs DBSTOCKBRO.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DBSTOCKBRO.NS has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while DBSTOCKBRO.NS trades at ₹25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas DBSTOCKBRO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DBSTOCKBRO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DBSTOCKBRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check DBSTOCKBRO.NS's competition here
SMCGLOBAL.BO vs SCAPDVR.NS Comparison February 2026
SMCGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMCGLOBAL.BO stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SCAPDVR.NS has a market cap of 879.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMCGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹78.82, while SCAPDVR.NS trades at ₹10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMCGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.60, whereas SCAPDVR.NS's P/E ratio is -260.00. In terms of profitability, SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCAPDVR.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMCGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SCAPDVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMCGLOBAL.BO.Check SCAPDVR.NS's competition here