Central Depository Services (India) Limited
Central Depository Services (India) Limited (CDSL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDSL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDSL.NS | ₹1,226.80 | -2.58% | 256.4B | 56.30 | ₹21.79 | +1.02% |
| MOTILALOFS.BO | ₹861.20 | -2.44% | 518.3B | 26.22 | ₹32.84 | +0.70% |
| MOTILALOFS.NS | ₹860.70 | -2.41% | 518B | 26.16 | ₹32.90 | +0.70% |
| AIIL.NS | ₹502.75 | +1.59% | 426.9B | 11.74 | ₹42.81 | +0.02% |
| ISEC.BO | ₹897.45 | +0.20% | 291.8B | 13.96 | ₹64.31 | N/A |
| ISEC.NS | ₹892.25 | -0.44% | 290.1B | 13.87 | ₹64.35 | N/A |
| CHOICEIN.BO | ₹684.95 | -0.30% | 152.6B | 61.16 | ₹11.20 | N/A |
| CHOICEIN.NS | ₹683.35 | -0.80% | 152.2B | 60.85 | ₹11.23 | N/A |
| JMFINANCIL.NS | ₹140.93 | -2.97% | 134.8B | 11.00 | ₹12.81 | +2.98% |
| JMFINANCIL.BO | ₹140.75 | -3.10% | 134.6B | 11.86 | ₹11.87 | +2.98% |
Stock Comparison
CDSL.NS vs MOTILALOFS.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, MOTILALOFS.BO has a market cap of 518.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while MOTILALOFS.BO trades at ₹861.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas MOTILALOFS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOTILALOFS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to MOTILALOFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check MOTILALOFS.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs MOTILALOFS.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, MOTILALOFS.NS has a market cap of 518B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while MOTILALOFS.NS trades at ₹860.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas MOTILALOFS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOTILALOFS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to MOTILALOFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check MOTILALOFS.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AIIL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AIIL.NS has a market cap of 426.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AIIL.NS trades at ₹502.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to AIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AIIL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ISEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ISEC.BO has a market cap of 291.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ISEC.BO trades at ₹897.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ISEC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ISEC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to ISEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ISEC.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ISEC.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ISEC.NS has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ISEC.NS trades at ₹892.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ISEC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ISEC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to ISEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ISEC.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs CHOICEIN.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, CHOICEIN.BO has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while CHOICEIN.BO trades at ₹684.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas CHOICEIN.BO's P/E ratio is 61.16. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHOICEIN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to CHOICEIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check CHOICEIN.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs CHOICEIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, CHOICEIN.NS has a market cap of 152.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while CHOICEIN.NS trades at ₹683.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas CHOICEIN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.85. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHOICEIN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to CHOICEIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check CHOICEIN.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs JMFINANCIL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.NS has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while JMFINANCIL.NS trades at ₹140.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas JMFINANCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMFINANCIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check JMFINANCIL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs JMFINANCIL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.BO has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while JMFINANCIL.BO trades at ₹140.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas JMFINANCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMFINANCIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check JMFINANCIL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs EDELWEISS.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, EDELWEISS.BO has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while EDELWEISS.BO trades at ₹124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas EDELWEISS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EDELWEISS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to EDELWEISS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check EDELWEISS.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs EDELWEISS.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, EDELWEISS.NS has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while EDELWEISS.NS trades at ₹124.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas EDELWEISS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EDELWEISS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to EDELWEISS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check EDELWEISS.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs IEX.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, IEX.NS has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while IEX.NS trades at ₹130.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas IEX.NS's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IEX.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to IEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check IEX.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs IEX.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, IEX.BO has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while IEX.BO trades at ₹130.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas IEX.BO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IEX.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to IEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check IEX.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs IIFLCAPS.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.BO has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while IIFLCAPS.BO trades at ₹351.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas IIFLCAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IIFLCAPS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check IIFLCAPS.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs IIFLCAPS.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.NS has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while IIFLCAPS.NS trades at ₹351.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas IIFLCAPS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IIFLCAPS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check IIFLCAPS.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs RELIGARE.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, RELIGARE.NS has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while RELIGARE.NS trades at ₹228.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas RELIGARE.NS's P/E ratio is 73.70. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RELIGARE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to RELIGARE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check RELIGARE.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs IIFLSEC.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, IIFLSEC.NS has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while IIFLSEC.NS trades at ₹231.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas IIFLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IIFLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to IIFLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check IIFLSEC.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs IIFLSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, IIFLSEC.BO has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while IIFLSEC.BO trades at ₹230.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas IIFLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IIFLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to IIFLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check IIFLSEC.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs INDOTHAI.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, INDOTHAI.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while INDOTHAI.NS trades at ₹288.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas INDOTHAI.NS's P/E ratio is 99.26. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDOTHAI.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTHAI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check INDOTHAI.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs INDOTHAI.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, INDOTHAI.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while INDOTHAI.BO trades at ₹288.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas INDOTHAI.BO's P/E ratio is 98.84. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDOTHAI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTHAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check INDOTHAI.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs TATAINVEST.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while TATAINVEST.NS trades at ₹697.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas TATAINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 81.70. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TATAINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to TATAINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check TATAINVEST.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs TATAINVEST.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while TATAINVEST.BO trades at ₹696.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas TATAINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 86.69. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TATAINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to TATAINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check TATAINVEST.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SGFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹573.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SHAREINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SHAREINDIA.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SHAREINDIA.BO trades at ₹145.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SHAREINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHAREINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to SHAREINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SHAREINDIA.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SHAREINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SHAREINDIA.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SHAREINDIA.NS trades at ₹144.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SHAREINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHAREINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to SHAREINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SHAREINDIA.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DHANI.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DHANI.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DHANI.NS trades at ₹51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 86.54. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DHANI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DHANI.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ANGELONE.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ANGELONE.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ANGELONE.NS trades at ₹317.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ANGELONE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ANGELONE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ANGELONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ANGELONE.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ANGELONE.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ANGELONE.BO has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ANGELONE.BO trades at ₹317.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ANGELONE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ANGELONE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ANGELONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ANGELONE.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs MONARCH.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, MONARCH.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while MONARCH.BO trades at ₹305.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas MONARCH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MONARCH.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to MONARCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check MONARCH.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs MONARCH.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, MONARCH.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while MONARCH.NS trades at ₹304.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas MONARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MONARCH.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to MONARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check MONARCH.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs GEOJITFSL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, GEOJITFSL.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while GEOJITFSL.BO trades at ₹69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas GEOJITFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEOJITFSL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to GEOJITFSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check GEOJITFSL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs GEOJITFSL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, GEOJITFSL.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while GEOJITFSL.NS trades at ₹69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas GEOJITFSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEOJITFSL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to GEOJITFSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check GEOJITFSL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SUMMITSEC.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SUMMITSEC.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SUMMITSEC.NS trades at ₹1,650.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SUMMITSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUMMITSEC.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to SUMMITSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SUMMITSEC.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SUMMITSEC.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SUMMITSEC.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SUMMITSEC.BO trades at ₹1,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SUMMITSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUMMITSEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to SUMMITSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SUMMITSEC.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ALGOQUANT.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ALGOQUANT.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ALGOQUANT.BO trades at ₹57.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ALGOQUANT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALGOQUANT.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ALGOQUANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ALGOQUANT.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DOLATALGO.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DOLATALGO.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DOLATALGO.BO trades at ₹77.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DOLATALGO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DOLATALGO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DOLATALGO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DOLATALGO.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DOLATALGO.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DOLATALGO.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DOLATALGO.NS trades at ₹77.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DOLATALGO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DOLATALGO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DOLATALGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DOLATALGO.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs PNBGILTS.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, PNBGILTS.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while PNBGILTS.BO trades at ₹70.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas PNBGILTS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNBGILTS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to PNBGILTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check PNBGILTS.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs PNBGILTS.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, PNBGILTS.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while PNBGILTS.NS trades at ₹70.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas PNBGILTS.NS's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNBGILTS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to PNBGILTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check PNBGILTS.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DAMCAPITAL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DAMCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DAMCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹167.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DAMCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DAMCAPITAL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DAMCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DAMCAPITAL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs MASTERTR.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, MASTERTR.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while MASTERTR.NS trades at ₹87.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas MASTERTR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MASTERTR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to MASTERTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check MASTERTR.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AFSL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AFSL.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AFSL.NS trades at ₹202.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AFSL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to AFSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AFSL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AFSL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AFSL.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AFSL.BO trades at ₹201.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFSL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to AFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AFSL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs 5PAISA.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, 5PAISA.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while 5PAISA.BO trades at ₹326.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas 5PAISA.BO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 5PAISA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to 5PAISA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check 5PAISA.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs 5PAISA.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, 5PAISA.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while 5PAISA.NS trades at ₹325.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas 5PAISA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to 5PAISA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to 5PAISA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check 5PAISA.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs WEALTH.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, WEALTH.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while WEALTH.NS trades at ₹926.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas WEALTH.NS's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WEALTH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to WEALTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check WEALTH.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs PRIMESECU.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, PRIMESECU.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while PRIMESECU.NS trades at ₹282.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas PRIMESECU.NS's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRIMESECU.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMESECU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check PRIMESECU.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs PRIMESECU.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, PRIMESECU.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while PRIMESECU.BO trades at ₹278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas PRIMESECU.BO's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRIMESECU.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMESECU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check PRIMESECU.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SYSTMTXC.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SYSTMTXC.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SYSTMTXC.NS trades at ₹68.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SYSTMTXC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYSTMTXC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to SYSTMTXC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SYSTMTXC.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DVL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DVL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DVL.BO trades at ₹256.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DVL.BO's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DVL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DVL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AHL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AHL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AHL.BO trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AHL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to AHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AHL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AHL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AHL.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AHL.NS trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AHL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to AHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AHL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DVL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DVL.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DVL.NS trades at ₹255.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DVL.NS's P/E ratio is -58.66. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DVL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DVL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs GCSL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, GCSL.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while GCSL.NS trades at ₹386.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas GCSL.NS's P/E ratio is -65.24. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GCSL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to GCSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check GCSL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs BIRLAMONEY.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, BIRLAMONEY.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while BIRLAMONEY.NS trades at ₹146.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas BIRLAMONEY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIRLAMONEY.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to BIRLAMONEY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check BIRLAMONEY.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs BIRLAMONEY.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, BIRLAMONEY.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while BIRLAMONEY.BO trades at ₹145.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas BIRLAMONEY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIRLAMONEY.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to BIRLAMONEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check BIRLAMONEY.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ARIHANTCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ARIHANTCAP.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ARIHANTCAP.NS trades at ₹72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ARIHANTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARIHANTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ARIHANTCAP.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ARIHANTCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ARIHANTCAP.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ARIHANTCAP.BO trades at ₹72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ARIHANTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARIHANTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ARIHANTCAP.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs VLSFINANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, VLSFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while VLSFINANCE.NS trades at ₹241.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas VLSFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VLSFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to VLSFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check VLSFINANCE.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs VLSFINANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, VLSFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while VLSFINANCE.BO trades at ₹240.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas VLSFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VLSFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to VLSFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check VLSFINANCE.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs CONSOFINVT.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, CONSOFINVT.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while CONSOFINVT.NS trades at ₹225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas CONSOFINVT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to CONSOFINVT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check CONSOFINVT.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SMCGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SMCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SMCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SMCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to SMCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SMCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SMCGLOBAL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SMCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SMCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹64.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SMCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to SMCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SMCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs THEINVEST.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, THEINVEST.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while THEINVEST.BO trades at ₹120.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas THEINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to THEINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to THEINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check THEINVEST.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs THEINVEST.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, THEINVEST.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while THEINVEST.NS trades at ₹120.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas THEINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to THEINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to THEINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check THEINVEST.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs WELINV.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, WELINV.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while WELINV.BO trades at ₹1,694.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas WELINV.BO's P/E ratio is 196.16. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WELINV.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to WELINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check WELINV.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs WELINV.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, WELINV.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while WELINV.NS trades at ₹1,692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas WELINV.NS's P/E ratio is 194.71. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WELINV.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to WELINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check WELINV.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DHUNINV.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DHUNINV.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DHUNINV.BO trades at ₹950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DHUNINV.BO's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DHUNINV.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to DHUNINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DHUNINV.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DHUNINV.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DHUNINV.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DHUNINV.NS trades at ₹944.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DHUNINV.NS's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DHUNINV.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DHUNINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DHUNINV.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs EMKAY.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, EMKAY.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while EMKAY.NS trades at ₹217.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas EMKAY.NS's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMKAY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to EMKAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check EMKAY.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs EMKAY.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, EMKAY.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while EMKAY.BO trades at ₹217.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas EMKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMKAY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to EMKAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check EMKAY.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs NBIFIN.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, NBIFIN.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while NBIFIN.NS trades at ₹2,053.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas NBIFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBIFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to NBIFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check NBIFIN.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs NAHARCAP.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, NAHARCAP.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while NAHARCAP.BO trades at ₹267.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas NAHARCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NAHARCAP.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check NAHARCAP.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs NAHARCAP.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, NAHARCAP.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while NAHARCAP.NS trades at ₹262.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas NAHARCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NAHARCAP.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check NAHARCAP.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AVONMORE.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AVONMORE.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AVONMORE.BO trades at ₹11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AVONMORE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVONMORE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to AVONMORE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AVONMORE.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AVONMORE.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AVONMORE.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AVONMORE.NS trades at ₹11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AVONMORE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVONMORE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to AVONMORE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AVONMORE.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ALMONDZ.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ALMONDZ.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ALMONDZ.NS trades at ₹16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ALMONDZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALMONDZ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ALMONDZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ALMONDZ.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs ALMONDZ.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, ALMONDZ.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while ALMONDZ.BO trades at ₹16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas ALMONDZ.BO's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALMONDZ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to ALMONDZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check ALMONDZ.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs NDGL.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, NDGL.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while NDGL.NS trades at ₹2,757.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas NDGL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.78. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NDGL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to NDGL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check NDGL.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SPCENET.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SPCENET.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SPCENET.NS trades at ₹3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SPCENET.NS's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPCENET.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to SPCENET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SPCENET.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs KEYFINSERV.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while KEYFINSERV.NS trades at ₹288.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas KEYFINSERV.NS's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEYFINSERV.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check KEYFINSERV.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AUSOMENT.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AUSOMENT.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AUSOMENT.BO trades at ₹147.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AUSOMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AUSOMENT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to AUSOMENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AUSOMENT.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs AUSOMENT.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, AUSOMENT.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while AUSOMENT.NS trades at ₹145.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas AUSOMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AUSOMENT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to AUSOMENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check AUSOMENT.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DELPHIFX.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DELPHIFX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DELPHIFX.BO trades at ₹11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DELPHIFX.BO's P/E ratio is 63.89. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DELPHIFX.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DELPHIFX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DELPHIFX.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs KEYFINSERV.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while KEYFINSERV.BO trades at ₹286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas KEYFINSERV.BO's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEYFINSERV.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check KEYFINSERV.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs INDBANK.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, INDBANK.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while INDBANK.NS trades at ₹34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas INDBANK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDBANK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to INDBANK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check INDBANK.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs INDBANK.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, INDBANK.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while INDBANK.BO trades at ₹34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas INDBANK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDBANK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to INDBANK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check INDBANK.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs STEELCITY.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, STEELCITY.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while STEELCITY.NS trades at ₹81.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas STEELCITY.NS's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STEELCITY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to STEELCITY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check STEELCITY.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs STAMPEDE.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, STAMPEDE.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while STAMPEDE.NS trades at ₹1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas STAMPEDE.NS's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STAMPEDE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to STAMPEDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check STAMPEDE.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs INVENTURE.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, INVENTURE.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while INVENTURE.BO trades at ₹1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas INVENTURE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INVENTURE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to INVENTURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check INVENTURE.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs INVENTURE.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, INVENTURE.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while INVENTURE.NS trades at ₹1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas INVENTURE.NS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INVENTURE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to INVENTURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check INVENTURE.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DBSTOCKBRO.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DBSTOCKBRO.NS has a market cap of 976.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DBSTOCKBRO.NS trades at ₹27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DBSTOCKBRO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DBSTOCKBRO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to DBSTOCKBRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DBSTOCKBRO.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs MCDHOLDING.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, MCDHOLDING.NS has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while MCDHOLDING.NS trades at ₹68.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas MCDHOLDING.NS's P/E ratio is -33.70. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCDHOLDING.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to MCDHOLDING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check MCDHOLDING.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs DBSTOCKBRO.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, DBSTOCKBRO.BO has a market cap of 959.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while DBSTOCKBRO.BO trades at ₹27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas DBSTOCKBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DBSTOCKBRO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to DBSTOCKBRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check DBSTOCKBRO.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs JAGSONSER.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, JAGSONSER.BO has a market cap of 944.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while JAGSONSER.BO trades at ₹51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas JAGSONSER.BO's P/E ratio is -74.14. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JAGSONSER.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to JAGSONSER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check JAGSONSER.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs TTGIL.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, TTGIL.BO has a market cap of 934.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while TTGIL.BO trades at ₹8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas TTGIL.BO's P/E ratio is -116.29. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TTGIL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to TTGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check TTGIL.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs BLBLIMITED.BO Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, BLBLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 887.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while BLBLIMITED.BO trades at ₹16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas BLBLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BLBLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to BLBLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check BLBLIMITED.BO's competition here
CDSL.NS vs BLBLIMITED.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, BLBLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 881.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while BLBLIMITED.NS trades at ₹16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas BLBLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BLBLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is less volatile compared to BLBLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check BLBLIMITED.NS's competition here
CDSL.NS vs SCAPDVR.NS Comparison May 2026
CDSL.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDSL.NS stands at 256.4B. In comparison, SCAPDVR.NS has a market cap of 879.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDSL.NS is priced at ₹1,226.80, while SCAPDVR.NS trades at ₹10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDSL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 56.30, whereas SCAPDVR.NS's P/E ratio is -260.00. In terms of profitability, CDSL.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SCAPDVR.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDSL.NS is more volatile compared to SCAPDVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDSL.NS.Check SCAPDVR.NS's competition here