BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 227.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while BLK.NE trades at CA$28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check BLK.NE's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 148.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while BN.TO trades at CA$90.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 225.27. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check BN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while BAM.TO trades at CA$82.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check BAM.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VFV.TO trades at CA$152.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VFV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$94.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZSP.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$35.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check PHYS.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XIU.TO trades at CA$40.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XIU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XEF.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VUN.TO trades at CA$114.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VUN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while IGM.TO trades at CA$44.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check IGM.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$36.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZCN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZEA.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VCN.TO trades at CA$55.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VCN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check PSLV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XUS.TO trades at CA$53.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XUS.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XIC.TO trades at CA$43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XIC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XSP.TO trades at CA$64.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XSP.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CEF.TO trades at CA$42.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CEF.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$35.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XEQT.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$110.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ONEX.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$48.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VEQT.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$39.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VGRO.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CASH.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VIU.TO trades at CA$38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VIU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CSAV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZMMK.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$53.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZLB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CIX.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VSP.TO trades at CA$99.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VSP.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check PSA.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZCS.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while HXS.TO trades at CA$88.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check HXS.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while HXT.TO trades at CA$71.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check HXT.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XSEM.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while QUU.TO trades at CA$248.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check QUU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$46.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZEB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VDY.TO trades at CA$52.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VDY.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XUU.TO trades at CA$63.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XUU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VBAL.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$56.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XQQ.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while TPU.TO trades at CA$49.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check TPU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$85.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZUE.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while TTP.TO trades at CA$31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check TTP.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$32.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XGRO.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZWB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while TPE.TO trades at CA$24.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check TPE.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XAW.TO trades at CA$46.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XAW.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$40.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check BBUC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XBB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VEE.TO trades at CA$41.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VEE.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$32.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XDIV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check PFMN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XEC.TO trades at CA$31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XEC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VXC.TO trades at CA$67.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VXC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while SII.TO trades at CA$91.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check SII.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VCE.TO trades at CA$58.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VCE.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$157.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZQQ.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check NSCE.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XCB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$55.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZLU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while QCN.TO trades at CA$165.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check QCN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check MNY.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$31.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XBAL.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VGG.TO trades at CA$95.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VGG.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XEI.TO trades at CA$28.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XEI.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while QQC.TO trades at CA$37.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check QQC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CMR.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$116.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check HSAV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZWU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 62.97. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check FIH-U.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XDV.TO trades at CA$34.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XDV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CACB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XIN.TO trades at CA$38.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XIN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XFN.TO trades at CA$65.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XFN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CYB.TO trades at CA$80.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CYB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XFH.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ISIF.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check CBIL.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZWC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XSH.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while UNC.TO trades at CA$14.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check UNC.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$45.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check HXCN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XGB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$24.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZEM.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZGB.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZPR.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check HMAX.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while EQL.TO trades at CA$38.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check EQL.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$19.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check FCUV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check RIIN.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XWD.TO trades at CA$99.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XWD.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, DCU.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while DCU.TO trades at CA$17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to DCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check DCU.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check XEG.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, FCUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while FCUQ.TO trades at CA$65.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUQ.TO's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to FCUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check FCUQ.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$88.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZUQ.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check BND.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while VUS.TO trades at CA$107.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check VUS.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$23.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check ZDV.TO's competition here

SLVU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SLVU.TO stands at 74.4M. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVU.TO is priced at CA$34.40, while QDX.TO trades at CA$132.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SLVU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, SLVU.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVU.TO is more volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVU.TO.Check QDX.TO's competition here