Silver Tiger Metals Inc.
Silver Tiger Metals Inc. (SLVTF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLVTF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVTF | $0.67 | +0.00% | 363.9M | -71.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $52.04 | +0.00% | 39B | 85.39 | $0.62 | +1.69% |
| ANGPY | $15.19 | +0.00% | 25.1B | 319.20 | $0.05 | +3.60% |
| IMPUY | $17.24 | +0.00% | 16.6B | 368.30 | $0.05 | +0.52% |
| IMPUF | $17.15 | +0.00% | 16B | 357.00 | $0.05 | +0.55% |
| MMSMY | $39.00 | +1.09% | 11.7B | 38.21 | $1.07 | +0.45% |
| XZJCF | $183.35 | +40.58% | 10.5B | 34.40 | $5.33 | +0.69% |
| JINFF | $24.60 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 24.29 | $1.03 | +0.32% |
| GMINF | $35.55 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 32.08 | $1.13 | N/A |
| OICT | $11.50 | +0.00% | 6.3B | -39.25 | -$0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLVTF vs FNLPF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while FNLPF trades at $52.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 85.39. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check FNLPF's competition here
SLVTF vs ANGPY Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ANGPY trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 319.20. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ANGPY's competition here
SLVTF vs IMPUY Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while IMPUY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is 368.30. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check IMPUY's competition here
SLVTF vs IMPUF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while IMPUF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is 357.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check IMPUF's competition here
SLVTF vs MMSMY Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, MMSMY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while MMSMY trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas MMSMY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MMSMY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to MMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check MMSMY's competition here
SLVTF vs XZJCF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, XZJCF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while XZJCF trades at $183.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas XZJCF's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XZJCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to XZJCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check XZJCF's competition here
SLVTF vs JINFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while JINFF trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check JINFF's competition here
SLVTF vs GMINF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while GMINF trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMINF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check GMINF's competition here
SLVTF vs OICT Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while OICT trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check OICT's competition here
SLVTF vs NMPNF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check NMPNF's competition here
SLVTF vs ZMPLF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ZMPLF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ZMPLF's competition here
SLVTF vs POYYF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check POYYF's competition here
SLVTF vs ABBRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ABBRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ABBRF trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ABBRF's P/E ratio is -99.55. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABBRF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ABBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ABBRF's competition here
SLVTF vs GLGDF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while GLGDF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check GLGDF's competition here
SLVTF vs AUCOY Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check AUCOY's competition here
SLVTF vs TIHRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while TIHRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check TIHRF's competition here
SLVTF vs FCSUF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while FCSUF trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check FCSUF's competition here
SLVTF vs BKRRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while BKRRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check BKRRF's competition here
SLVTF vs SAPLF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 396.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SAPLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SAPLF's competition here
SLVTF vs IAUFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while IAUFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check IAUFF's competition here
SLVTF vs BRVMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while BRVMF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check BRVMF's competition here
SLVTF vs TPRFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check TPRFF's competition here
SLVTF vs GOTRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while GOTRF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -12.77. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check GOTRF's competition here
SLVTF vs HGLD Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while HGLD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check HGLD's competition here
SLVTF vs CHPGF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while CHPGF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check CHPGF's competition here
SLVTF vs SMDRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SMDRF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -167.10. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SMDRF's competition here
SLVTF vs PAASF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PAASF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PAASF's competition here
SLVTF vs SSVFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SSVFF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SSVFF's competition here
SLVTF vs CAPTF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while CAPTF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check CAPTF's competition here
SLVTF vs ORVMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ORVMF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ORVMF's competition here
SLVTF vs SNNGF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SNNGF has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SNNGF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SNNGF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNNGF's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to SNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SNNGF's competition here
SLVTF vs BOCOF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while BOCOF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check BOCOF's competition here
SLVTF vs TBXXF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while TBXXF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check TBXXF's competition here
SLVTF vs XANAF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 137.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while XANAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XANAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check XANAF's competition here
SLVTF vs PLLHF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PLLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PLLHF's competition here
SLVTF vs TSORF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while TSORF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -121.07. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check TSORF's competition here
SLVTF vs OCGSF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while OCGSF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check OCGSF's competition here
SLVTF vs EMPYF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while EMPYF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check EMPYF's competition here
SLVTF vs NAUFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while NAUFF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -21.39. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check NAUFF's competition here
SLVTF vs SDRC Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SDRC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -299.40. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SDRC's competition here
SLVTF vs SCTSF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SCTSF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SCTSF's competition here
SLVTF vs CTNXF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check CTNXF's competition here
SLVTF vs AGLDF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while AGLDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check AGLDF's competition here
SLVTF vs PGLDF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PGLDF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PGLDF's competition here
SLVTF vs LUCRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while LUCRF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check LUCRF's competition here
SLVTF vs AMNP Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, AMNP has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while AMNP trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas AMNP's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMNP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to AMNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check AMNP's competition here
SLVTF vs DNCVF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while DNCVF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check DNCVF's competition here
SLVTF vs VIPRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while VIPRF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check VIPRF's competition here
SLVTF vs TEUTF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 86.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while TEUTF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check TEUTF's competition here
SLVTF vs ACRG Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ACRG trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ACRG's competition here
SLVTF vs LGCXF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while LGCXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check LGCXF's competition here
SLVTF vs AGMRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while AGMRF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check AGMRF's competition here
SLVTF vs THMG Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while THMG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THMG's ROE of +8.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check THMG's competition here
SLVTF vs VLMGF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while VLMGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check VLMGF's competition here
SLVTF vs ELRFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ELRFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ELRFF's competition here
SLVTF vs HEGLF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while HEGLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check HEGLF's competition here
SLVTF vs KDKCF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while KDKCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -71.37. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check KDKCF's competition here
SLVTF vs LBCMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, LBCMF has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while LBCMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas LBCMF's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LBCMF's ROE of -6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to LBCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check LBCMF's competition here
SLVTF vs CPPMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, CPPMF has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while CPPMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas CPPMF's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPPMF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to CPPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check CPPMF's competition here
SLVTF vs ARRKF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ARRKF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ARRKF's competition here
SLVTF vs MMNGF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while MMNGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check MMNGF's competition here
SLVTF vs EQMEF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while EQMEF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -29.42. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check EQMEF's competition here
SLVTF vs EMPPF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while EMPPF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check EMPPF's competition here
SLVTF vs BRGC Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while BRGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check BRGC's competition here
SLVTF vs ACKRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ACKRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ACKRF's competition here
SLVTF vs PDLMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PDLMF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PDLMF's competition here
SLVTF vs VTXXF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while VTXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check VTXXF's competition here
SLVTF vs SMOFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SMOFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SMOFF's competition here
SLVTF vs CTMCF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while CTMCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check CTMCF's competition here
SLVTF vs KGFMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while KGFMF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check KGFMF's competition here
SLVTF vs ATEPF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ATEPF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ATEPF's competition here
SLVTF vs ADYRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ADYRF's competition here
SLVTF vs RKHNF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while RKHNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check RKHNF's competition here
SLVTF vs DNRSF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while DNRSF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check DNRSF's competition here
SLVTF vs PNTRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PNTRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PNTRF's competition here
SLVTF vs PVGDF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PVGDF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PVGDF's competition here
SLVTF vs DYNR Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while DYNR trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DYNR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check DYNR's competition here
SLVTF vs SSVRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SSVRF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SSVRF's competition here
SLVTF vs MRZLF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while MRZLF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -8.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check MRZLF's competition here
SLVTF vs HMRRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check HMRRF's competition here
SLVTF vs RITE Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, RITE has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while RITE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas RITE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RITE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to RITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check RITE's competition here
SLVTF vs CJIMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while CJIMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -67.90. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check CJIMF's competition here
SLVTF vs SUNPF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SUNPF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SUNPF's competition here
SLVTF vs WAMFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while WAMFF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check WAMFF's competition here
SLVTF vs OKPRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check OKPRF's competition here
SLVTF vs WEXPF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while WEXPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check WEXPF's competition here
SLVTF vs MHTZF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, MHTZF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while MHTZF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas MHTZF's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MHTZF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to MHTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check MHTZF's competition here
SLVTF vs TLSMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check TLSMF's competition here
SLVTF vs ZLME Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ZLME has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ZLME trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ZLME's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZLME's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLVTF has daily volatility of 4.38 and ZLME has daily volatility of N/A.Check ZLME's competition here
SLVTF vs GLDRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check GLDRF's competition here
SLVTF vs ASLRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ASLRF's competition here
SLVTF vs STRFF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, STRFF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while STRFF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas STRFF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STRFF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to STRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check STRFF's competition here
SLVTF vs ESGLF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, ESGLF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while ESGLF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas ESGLF's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESGLF's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to ESGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check ESGLF's competition here
SLVTF vs SBMCF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +15.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SBMCF's competition here
SLVTF vs AUCUF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while AUCUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check AUCUF's competition here
SLVTF vs URVNF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check URVNF's competition here
SLVTF vs SHGDF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SHGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is more volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SHGDF's competition here
SLVTF vs SBLRF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, SBLRF has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while SBLRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas SBLRF's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SBLRF's ROE of +5.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to SBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check SBLRF's competition here
SLVTF vs PLLMF Comparison February 2026
SLVTF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLVTF stands at 363.9M. In comparison, PLLMF has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLVTF is priced at $0.67, while PLLMF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLVTF currently has a P/E ratio of -71.50, whereas PLLMF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SLVTF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLLMF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLVTF is less volatile compared to PLLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLVTF.Check PLLMF's competition here