Sun Life Financial Inc.
Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF | $58.91 | +0.32% | 33.1B | 14.47 | $4.07 | +4.09% |
| BRK-A | $734,405.00 | +0.18% | 1.1T | 16.76 | $43,749.02 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $489.00 | +0.08% | 1.1T | 16.75 | $29.17 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.5B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +1.98% |
| AEH | $25.67 | +0.00% | 52.5B | 19.37 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AED | $25.52 | +0.00% | 52.2B | 19.26 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.1B | 18.88 | $1.33 | N/A |
| AIG | $83.38 | +0.96% | 46.2B | 15.59 | $5.35 | +1.98% |
| HIG | $134.02 | +0.62% | 37.7B | 12.16 | $11.02 | +1.52% |
| HIG-PG | $25.20 | +0.36% | 36.6B | 3.46 | $7.30 | +1.52% |
Stock Comparison
SLF vs BRK-A Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BRK-A has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while BRK-A trades at $734,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BRK-A's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRK-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to BRK-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check BRK-A's competition here
SLF vs BRK-B Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while BRK-B trades at $489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check BRK-B's competition here
SLF vs AIG-PA Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AIG-PA's competition here
SLF vs AEH Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AEH's competition here
SLF vs AED Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AED's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AED's competition here
SLF vs AEB Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AEB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AEB's competition here
SLF vs AIG Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AIG trades at $83.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AIG's competition here
SLF vs HIG Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while HIG trades at $134.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check HIG's competition here
SLF vs HIG-PG Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while HIG-PG trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check HIG-PG's competition here
SLF vs ACGL Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ACGL trades at $93.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ACGL's competition here
SLF vs ACGLO Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ACGLO trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ACGLO's competition here
SLF vs ATH Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ATH's competition here
SLF vs PFG Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while PFG trades at $80.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check PFG's competition here
SLF vs EQH Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while EQH trades at $53.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check EQH's competition here
SLF vs BNT Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while BNT trades at $65.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check BNT's competition here
SLF vs ACGLP Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ACGLP's competition here
SLF vs AEG Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AEG trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AEG's competition here
SLF vs UNMA Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while UNMA trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check UNMA's competition here
SLF vs AIZN Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while AIZN trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check AIZN's competition here
SLF vs ORI Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ORI trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ORI's competition here
SLF vs ACGLN Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ACGLN trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ACGLN's competition here
SLF vs EQH-PA Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while EQH-PA trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check EQH-PA's competition here
SLF vs ATH-PE Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ATH-PE trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ATH-PE's competition here
SLF vs ESGRP Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ESGRP trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ESGRP's competition here
SLF vs EQH-PC Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while EQH-PC trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check EQH-PC's competition here
SLF vs ATH-PA Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ATH-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ATH-PA's competition here
SLF vs ATH-PC Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ATH-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ATH-PC's competition here
SLF vs ESGR Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ESGR trades at $337.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ESGR's competition here
SLF vs ESGRO Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ESGRO trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ESGRO's competition here
SLF vs ATH-PB Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ATH-PB trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ATH-PB's competition here
SLF vs CNO-PA Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while CNO-PA trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check CNO-PA's competition here
SLF vs ATH-PD Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ATH-PD trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ATH-PD's competition here
SLF vs GSHD Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while GSHD trades at $89.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 78.50. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSHD's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check GSHD's competition here
SLF vs FIHL Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while FIHL trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is -46.20. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIHL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check FIHL's competition here
SLF vs RZC Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while RZC trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check RZC's competition here
SLF vs IGIC Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while IGIC trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check IGIC's competition here
SLF vs ARGD Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 886.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ARGD trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ARGD's competition here
SLF vs YB Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while YB trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YB's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check YB's competition here
SLF vs WDH Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while WDH trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check WDH's competition here
SLF vs FGFPP Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while FGFPP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check FGFPP's competition here
SLF vs FGF Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while FGF trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check FGF's competition here
SLF vs WTREP Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while WTREP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check WTREP's competition here
SLF vs IGICW Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while IGICW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check IGICW's competition here
SLF vs ANAT Comparison August 2025
SLF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLF stands at 33.1B. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLF is priced at $58.91, while ANAT trades at $188.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.47, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, SLF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLF is more volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLF.Check ANAT's competition here