Aegon N.V. PERP CAP FLTG RT (AEB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEB | $25.01 | -0.08% | 51.1B | 18.88 | $1.33 | +5.06% |
| BRK-A | $736,000.00 | -0.34% | 1.1T | 22.94 | $32,096.47 | N/A |
| BRK-B | $490.91 | -0.45% | 1.1T | 16.37 | $29.98 | N/A |
| AIG-PA | $62.68 | +6.02% | 112.5B | 5.48 | $11.44 | +2.30% |
| AEH | $25.67 | +0.00% | 52.5B | 19.37 | $1.33 | +5.06% |
| AED | $25.52 | +0.00% | 52.2B | 19.26 | $1.33 | +5.06% |
| SLF | $81.78 | +0.20% | 45.3B | 15.07 | $5.43 | +3.25% |
| AIG | $80.50 | +3.17% | 42.7B | 9.96 | $8.08 | +2.30% |
| HIG | $140.26 | +2.64% | 38.4B | 9.78 | $14.34 | +1.65% |
| ACGL | $101.35 | +1.31% | 35.4B | 9.36 | $10.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AEB vs BRK-A Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, BRK-A has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while BRK-A trades at $736,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BRK-A's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRK-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to BRK-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check BRK-A's competition here
AEB vs BRK-B Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while BRK-B trades at $490.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check BRK-B's competition here
AEB vs AIG-PA Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AIG-PA's competition here
AEB vs AEH Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AEH trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AEH's competition here
AEB vs AED Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AED has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AED trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AED's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AED's competition here
AEB vs SLF Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while SLF trades at $81.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check SLF's competition here
AEB vs AIG Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AIG trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AIG's competition here
AEB vs HIG Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while HIG trades at $140.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check HIG's competition here
AEB vs ACGL Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ACGL trades at $101.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ACGL's competition here
AEB vs ACGLN Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ACGLN trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ACGLN's competition here
AEB vs ATH Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ATH trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ATH's competition here
AEB vs RZC Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while RZC trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check RZC's competition here
AEB vs ACGLP Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ACGLP's competition here
AEB vs BNT Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while BNT trades at $43.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 174.84. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check BNT's competition here
AEB vs UNMA Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while UNMA trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check UNMA's competition here
AEB vs EQH-PA Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while EQH-PA trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check EQH-PA's competition here
AEB vs EQH-PC Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while EQH-PC trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check EQH-PC's competition here
AEB vs AEG Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AEG trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AEG's competition here
AEB vs AIZN Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AIZN trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AIZN's competition here
AEB vs EQH Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while EQH trades at $48.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQH's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check EQH's competition here
AEB vs ACGLO Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ACGLO trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ACGLO's competition here
AEB vs ORI Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ORI trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ORI's competition here
AEB vs AXS Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AXS trades at $114.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AXS's competition here
AEB vs AXS-PE Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AXS-PE trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AXS-PE's competition here
AEB vs WTM Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while WTM trades at $2,211.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check WTM's competition here
AEB vs ESGRP Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ESGRP trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ESGRP's competition here
AEB vs ATH-PC Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ATH-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ATH-PC's competition here
AEB vs ESGR Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ESGR trades at $337.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ESGR's competition here
AEB vs ESGRO Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ESGRO trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ESGRO's competition here
AEB vs CNO-PA Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while CNO-PA trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check CNO-PA's competition here
AEB vs GNW Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while GNW trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check GNW's competition here
AEB vs AHL-PE Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AHL-PE trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AHL-PE's competition here
AEB vs FIHL Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while FIHL trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIHL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check FIHL's competition here
AEB vs AHL-PD Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AHL-PD trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AHL-PD's competition here
AEB vs PLGO Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, PLGO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while PLGO trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas PLGO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLGO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to PLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check PLGO's competition here
AEB vs GSHD Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while GSHD trades at $54.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSHD's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check GSHD's competition here
AEB vs XZO Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, XZO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while XZO trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas XZO's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XZO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to XZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check XZO's competition here
AEB vs IGIC Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while IGIC trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check IGIC's competition here
AEB vs ARGD Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 874.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ARGD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARGD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ARGD's competition here
AEB vs KWY Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, KWY has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while KWY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KWY's P/E ratio is -96.20. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KWY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to KWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check KWY's competition here
AEB vs KG Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, KG has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while KG trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas KG's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to KG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check KG's competition here
AEB vs XHG Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while XHG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check XHG's competition here
AEB vs FGFPP Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while FGFPP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check FGFPP's competition here
AEB vs IGICW Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while IGICW trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check IGICW's competition here
AEB vs HGH Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, HGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while HGH trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas HGH's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to HGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check HGH's competition here
AEB vs ANAT Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while ANAT trades at $188.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check ANAT's competition here
AEB vs AMIC Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AMIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while AMIC trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas AMIC's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is less volatile compared to AMIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check AMIC's competition here
AEB vs WTREP Comparison July 2026
AEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEB stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEB is priced at $25.01, while WTREP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEB currently has a P/E ratio of 18.88, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, AEB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEB is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEB.Check WTREP's competition here