Sizemasters Technology Ltd.
Sizemasters Technology Ltd. (SIZEMASTER.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SIZEMASTER.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Miscellaneous Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIZEMASTER.BO | ₹268.95 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 84.64 | ₹3.19 | N/A |
| HAWKINCOOK.BO | ₹7,251.35 | +0.00% | 38.1B | 30.26 | ₹237.84 | +1.81% |
| MORGANITE.BO | ₹1,360.25 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 29.43 | ₹45.19 | +3.68% |
| SHISHIND.BO | ₹14.74 | +0.00% | 5.5B | -16.42 | -₹0.88 | N/A |
| CPL.BO | ₹71.41 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 12.45 | ₹5.81 | N/A |
| PODARPIGQ.BO | ₹378.85 | -1.76% | 4B | 22.23 | ₹17.04 | N/A |
| DHABRIYA.BO | ₹363.00 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 14.52 | ₹25.12 | +0.19% |
| KISAN.BO | ₹27.62 | +0.00% | 3.2B | -88.50 | -₹0.30 | N/A |
| FLUIDOM.BO | ₹570.70 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 13.66 | ₹42.45 | +1.29% |
| INDAG.BO | ₹96.50 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 41.53 | ₹2.32 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
SIZEMASTER.BO vs HAWKINCOOK.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAWKINCOOK.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while HAWKINCOOK.BO trades at ₹7,251.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas HAWKINCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check HAWKINCOOK.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs MORGANITE.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MORGANITE.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while MORGANITE.BO trades at ₹1,360.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas MORGANITE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MORGANITE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to MORGANITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check MORGANITE.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs SHISHIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHISHIND.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while SHISHIND.BO trades at ₹14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas SHISHIND.BO's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHISHIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and SHISHIND.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHISHIND.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs CPL.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CPL.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while CPL.BO trades at ₹71.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas CPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to CPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check CPL.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs PODARPIGQ.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PODARPIGQ.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while PODARPIGQ.BO trades at ₹378.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas PODARPIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PODARPIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to PODARPIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check PODARPIGQ.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs DHABRIYA.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DHABRIYA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while DHABRIYA.BO trades at ₹363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas DHABRIYA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHABRIYA.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to DHABRIYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check DHABRIYA.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs KISAN.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KISAN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while KISAN.BO trades at ₹27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas KISAN.BO's P/E ratio is -88.50. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KISAN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to KISAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check KISAN.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs FLUIDOM.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FLUIDOM.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while FLUIDOM.BO trades at ₹570.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas FLUIDOM.BO's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLUIDOM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to FLUIDOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check FLUIDOM.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs INDAG.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INDAG.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while INDAG.BO trades at ₹96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas INDAG.BO's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDAG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to INDAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check INDAG.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs KAKA.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KAKA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while KAKA.BO trades at ₹182.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas KAKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAKA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to KAKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check KAKA.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs SIGNETIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SIGNETIND.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while SIGNETIND.BO trades at ₹71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas SIGNETIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIGNETIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNETIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check SIGNETIND.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs DHPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DHPIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while DHPIND.BO trades at ₹512.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas DHPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHPIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to DHPIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check DHPIND.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs CAPPIPES.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CAPPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while CAPPIPES.BO trades at ₹9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas CAPPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CAPPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to CAPPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check CAPPIPES.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs APTPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APTPACK.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while APTPACK.BO trades at ₹125.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas APTPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 152.66. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APTPACK.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to APTPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check APTPACK.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs MITSU.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MITSU.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while MITSU.BO trades at ₹106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas MITSU.BO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MITSU.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to MITSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check MITSU.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs SOMICONV.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SOMICONV.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while SOMICONV.BO trades at ₹97.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas SOMICONV.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOMICONV.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to SOMICONV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check SOMICONV.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs GENESIS.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GENESIS.BO has a market cap of 969.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while GENESIS.BO trades at ₹78.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas GENESIS.BO's P/E ratio is -438.65. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENESIS.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to GENESIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check GENESIS.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs ALKOSIGN.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALKOSIGN.BO has a market cap of 733.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while ALKOSIGN.BO trades at ₹68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas ALKOSIGN.BO's P/E ratio is 78.16. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALKOSIGN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and ALKOSIGN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALKOSIGN.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs DUTRON.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DUTRON.BO has a market cap of 666M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while DUTRON.BO trades at ₹112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas DUTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DUTRON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and DUTRON.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DUTRON.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs NATPLAS.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NATPLAS.BO has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while NATPLAS.BO trades at ₹48.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas NATPLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATPLAS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to NATPLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check NATPLAS.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs RASIELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RASIELEC.BO has a market cap of 414.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while RASIELEC.BO trades at ₹13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas RASIELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RASIELEC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to RASIELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check RASIELEC.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs PANKAJPO.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PANKAJPO.BO has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while PANKAJPO.BO trades at ₹59.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas PANKAJPO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANKAJPO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to PANKAJPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check PANKAJPO.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs ALFAICA.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALFAICA.BO has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while ALFAICA.BO trades at ₹77.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas ALFAICA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALFAICA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and ALFAICA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALFAICA.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs RAMGOPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAMGOPOLY.BO has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while RAMGOPOLY.BO trades at ₹18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas RAMGOPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -203.30. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check RAMGOPOLY.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs MAHACORP.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MAHACORP.BO has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while MAHACORP.BO trades at ₹0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas MAHACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MAHACORP.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to MAHACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check MAHACORP.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs COMMAND.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, COMMAND.BO has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while COMMAND.BO trades at ₹24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas COMMAND.BO's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COMMAND.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and COMMAND.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COMMAND.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs SONALAD.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SONALAD.BO has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while SONALAD.BO trades at ₹36.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas SONALAD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SONALAD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to SONALAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check SONALAD.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs IYKOTHITE.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IYKOTHITE.BO has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while IYKOTHITE.BO trades at ₹10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas IYKOTHITE.BO's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IYKOTHITE.BO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to IYKOTHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check IYKOTHITE.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs VAMSHIRU.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VAMSHIRU.BO has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while VAMSHIRU.BO trades at ₹44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas VAMSHIRU.BO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VAMSHIRU.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to VAMSHIRU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check VAMSHIRU.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs NIRAJISPAT.NS Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NIRAJISPAT.NS has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while NIRAJISPAT.NS trades at ₹292.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas NIRAJISPAT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and NIRAJISPAT.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIRAJISPAT.NS's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs KUNSTOFF.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KUNSTOFF.BO has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while KUNSTOFF.BO trades at ₹23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas KUNSTOFF.BO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KUNSTOFF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to KUNSTOFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check KUNSTOFF.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs KKPLASTICK.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KKPLASTICK.BO has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while KKPLASTICK.BO trades at ₹27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas KKPLASTICK.BO's P/E ratio is 283.50. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKPLASTICK.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to KKPLASTICK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check KKPLASTICK.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs POLYCON.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, POLYCON.BO has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while POLYCON.BO trades at ₹26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas POLYCON.BO's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POLYCON.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and POLYCON.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POLYCON.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs ASHISHPO.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ASHISHPO.BO has a market cap of 111.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while ASHISHPO.BO trades at ₹30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas ASHISHPO.BO's P/E ratio is 149.55. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASHISHPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to ASHISHPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check ASHISHPO.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs MILESTONE.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MILESTONE.BO has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while MILESTONE.BO trades at ₹17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas MILESTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MILESTONE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to MILESTONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check MILESTONE.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs NARMP.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NARMP.BO has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while NARMP.BO trades at ₹23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas NARMP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NARMP.BO's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to NARMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check NARMP.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs SHGANEL.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHGANEL.BO has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while SHGANEL.BO trades at ₹13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas SHGANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHGANEL.BO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and SHGANEL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGANEL.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs ARCEEIN.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARCEEIN.BO has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while ARCEEIN.BO trades at ₹14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas ARCEEIN.BO's P/E ratio is -39.27. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARCEEIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO and ARCEEIN.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARCEEIN.BO's competition here
SIZEMASTER.BO vs INNOCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
SIZEMASTER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIZEMASTER.BO stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INNOCORP.BO has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIZEMASTER.BO is priced at ₹268.95, while INNOCORP.BO trades at ₹4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIZEMASTER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.64, whereas INNOCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INNOCORP.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIZEMASTER.BO is less volatile compared to INNOCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIZEMASTER.BO.Check INNOCORP.BO's competition here