Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FLUIDOM.BO's competitors and their performance on the BSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Miscellaneous Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FLUIDOM.BO and its BSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUIDOM.BO | ₹760.90 | +0.65% | 3.7B | 17.84 | ₹42.65 | +0.99% |
| SUPREMEIND.BO | ₹3,367.00 | -3.82% | 427.7B | 41.41 | ₹81.30 | +1.07% |
| SUPREMEIND.NS | ₹3,364.40 | -4.15% | 427.4B | 41.39 | ₹81.28 | +1.07% |
| ASTRAL.NS | ₹1,411.40 | -3.26% | 379.2B | 65.34 | ₹21.60 | +0.28% |
| ASTRAL.BO | ₹1,410.10 | -3.42% | 375.1B | 65.28 | ₹21.60 | +0.28% |
| HAWKINCOOK.BO | ₹8,400.25 | -0.45% | 44.4B | 33.86 | ₹248.08 | +1.67% |
| APOLLOPIPE.BO | ₹556.15 | -2.17% | 24.4B | -278.07 | -₹2.00 | +0.13% |
| APOLLOPIPE.NS | ₹554.90 | -2.54% | 24.4B | -277.45 | -₹2.00 | +0.13% |
| MORGANITE.BO | ₹1,966.00 | -1.54% | 11B | 47.85 | ₹41.09 | +0.64% |
| GRPLTD.BO | ₹1,940.10 | -2.52% | 10.3B | 181.83 | ₹10.67 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
The Supreme Industries Limited (BSE: SUPREMEIND.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs SUPREMEIND.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.BO has a market cap of 427.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while SUPREMEIND.BO trades at ₹3,367.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas SUPREMEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SUPREMEIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.BO's competition here
The Supreme Industries Limited (NSE: SUPREMEIND.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs SUPREMEIND.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SUPREMEIND.NS has a market cap of 427.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while SUPREMEIND.NS trades at ₹3,364.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas SUPREMEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SUPREMEIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREMEIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check SUPREMEIND.NS's competition here
Astral Limited (NSE: ASTRAL.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ASTRAL.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASTRAL.NS has a market cap of 379.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ASTRAL.NS trades at ₹1,411.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ASTRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.34. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASTRAL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRAL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ASTRAL.NS's competition here
Astral Limited (BSE: ASTRAL.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ASTRAL.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASTRAL.BO has a market cap of 375.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ASTRAL.BO trades at ₹1,410.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ASTRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 65.28. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASTRAL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRAL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ASTRAL.BO's competition here
Hawkins Cookers Limited (BSE: HAWKINCOOK.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs HAWKINCOOK.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HAWKINCOOK.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while HAWKINCOOK.BO trades at ₹8,400.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas HAWKINCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check HAWKINCOOK.BO's competition here
Apollo Pipes Ltd. (BSE: APOLLOPIPE.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs APOLLOPIPE.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.BO has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while APOLLOPIPE.BO trades at ₹556.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas APOLLOPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is -278.07. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check APOLLOPIPE.BO's competition here
Apollo Pipes Limited (NSE: APOLLOPIPE.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs APOLLOPIPE.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, APOLLOPIPE.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while APOLLOPIPE.NS trades at ₹554.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas APOLLOPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is -277.45. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOPIPE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check APOLLOPIPE.NS's competition here
Foseco Crucible (India) Limited (BSE: MORGANITE.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs MORGANITE.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MORGANITE.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while MORGANITE.BO trades at ₹1,966.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas MORGANITE.BO's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MORGANITE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to MORGANITE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check MORGANITE.BO's competition here
GRP Limited (BSE: GRPLTD.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs GRPLTD.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GRPLTD.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while GRPLTD.BO trades at ₹1,940.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas GRPLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 181.83. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRPLTD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to GRPLTD.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check GRPLTD.BO's competition here
GRP Limited (NSE: GRPLTD.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs GRPLTD.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GRPLTD.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while GRPLTD.NS trades at ₹1,925.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas GRPLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 180.42. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRPLTD.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to GRPLTD.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check GRPLTD.NS's competition here
Dhabriya Polywood Limited (BSE: DHABRIYA.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs DHABRIYA.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DHABRIYA.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while DHABRIYA.BO trades at ₹509.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas DHABRIYA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHABRIYA.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to DHABRIYA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check DHABRIYA.BO's competition here
Poddar Pigments Limited (BSE: PODARPIGQ.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs PODARPIGQ.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PODARPIGQ.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while PODARPIGQ.BO trades at ₹378.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas PODARPIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PODARPIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to PODARPIGQ.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check PODARPIGQ.BO's competition here
Captain Polyplast Ltd. (BSE: CPL.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs CPL.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CPL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while CPL.BO trades at ₹64.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas CPL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to CPL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check CPL.BO's competition here
Sizemasters Technology Ltd. (BSE: SIZEMASTER.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs SIZEMASTER.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SIZEMASTER.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while SIZEMASTER.BO trades at ₹352.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas SIZEMASTER.BO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to SIZEMASTER.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check SIZEMASTER.BO's competition here
Indag Rubber Limited (BSE: INDAG.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs INDAG.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, INDAG.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while INDAG.BO trades at ₹131.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas INDAG.BO's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDAG.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to INDAG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check INDAG.BO's competition here
Gayatri Rubbers & Chemicals Ltd. (NSE: GRCL.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs GRCL.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GRCL.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while GRCL.NS trades at ₹577.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas GRCL.NS's P/E ratio is 116.20. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRCL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to GRCL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check GRCL.NS's competition here
Essen Speciality Films Ltd. (NSE: ESFL.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ESFL.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ESFL.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ESFL.NS trades at ₹119.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ESFL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESFL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to ESFL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ESFL.NS's competition here
Kaka Industries Limited (BSE: KAKA.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs KAKA.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KAKA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while KAKA.BO trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas KAKA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAKA.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to KAKA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check KAKA.BO's competition here
Cool Caps Industries Limited (NSE: COOLCAPS.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs COOLCAPS.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, COOLCAPS.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while COOLCAPS.NS trades at ₹25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas COOLCAPS.NS's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COOLCAPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to COOLCAPS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check COOLCAPS.NS's competition here
Elgi Rubber Company Limited (NSE: ELGIRUBCO.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ELGIRUBCO.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ELGIRUBCO.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ELGIRUBCO.NS trades at ₹58.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ELGIRUBCO.NS's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELGIRUBCO.NS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to ELGIRUBCO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ELGIRUBCO.NS's competition here
Kisan Mouldings Limited (BSE: KISAN.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs KISAN.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KISAN.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while KISAN.BO trades at ₹23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas KISAN.BO's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KISAN.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to KISAN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check KISAN.BO's competition here
Mitsu Chem Plast Ltd (BSE: MITSU.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs MITSU.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MITSU.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while MITSU.BO trades at ₹172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas MITSU.BO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MITSU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to MITSU.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check MITSU.BO's competition here
Signet Industries Limited (BSE: SIGNETIND.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs SIGNETIND.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SIGNETIND.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while SIGNETIND.BO trades at ₹71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas SIGNETIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIGNETIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNETIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check SIGNETIND.BO's competition here
Master Components Ltd. (NSE: MASTER.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs MASTER.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MASTER.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while MASTER.NS trades at ₹415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas MASTER.NS's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MASTER.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to MASTER.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check MASTER.NS's competition here
DHP India Limited (BSE: DHPIND.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs DHPIND.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DHPIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while DHPIND.BO trades at ₹514.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas DHPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DHPIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to DHPIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check DHPIND.BO's competition here
Rex Pipes & Cables Industries Ltd. (NSE: REXPIPES.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs REXPIPES.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, REXPIPES.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while REXPIPES.NS trades at ₹160.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas REXPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REXPIPES.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to REXPIPES.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check REXPIPES.NS's competition here
Somi Conveyor Beltings Limited (BSE: SOMICONV.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs SOMICONV.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SOMICONV.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while SOMICONV.BO trades at ₹97.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas SOMICONV.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SOMICONV.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to SOMICONV.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check SOMICONV.BO's competition here
Durlax Top Surface Ltd. (NSE: DURLAX.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs DURLAX.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DURLAX.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while DURLAX.NS trades at ₹60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas DURLAX.NS's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DURLAX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to DURLAX.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check DURLAX.NS's competition here
Pankaj Polymers Limited (BSE: PANKAJPO.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs PANKAJPO.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PANKAJPO.BO has a market cap of 798.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while PANKAJPO.BO trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas PANKAJPO.BO's P/E ratio is 855.06. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PANKAJPO.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to PANKAJPO.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check PANKAJPO.BO's competition here
APT Packaging Ltd. (BSE: APTPACK.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs APTPACK.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, APTPACK.BO has a market cap of 796.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while APTPACK.BO trades at ₹67.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas APTPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -79.96. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APTPACK.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to APTPACK.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check APTPACK.BO's competition here
Alkosign Ltd. (BSE: ALKOSIGN.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ALKOSIGN.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ALKOSIGN.BO has a market cap of 696.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ALKOSIGN.BO trades at ₹64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ALKOSIGN.BO's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALKOSIGN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to ALKOSIGN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ALKOSIGN.BO's competition here
Dutron Polymers Limited (BSE: DUTRON.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs DUTRON.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DUTRON.BO has a market cap of 621.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while DUTRON.BO trades at ₹103.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas DUTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DUTRON.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to DUTRON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check DUTRON.BO's competition here
Iykot Hitech Toolroom Limited (BSE: IYKOTHITE.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs IYKOTHITE.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IYKOTHITE.BO has a market cap of 449.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while IYKOTHITE.BO trades at ₹22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas IYKOTHITE.BO's P/E ratio is -32.59. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IYKOTHITE.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to IYKOTHITE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check IYKOTHITE.BO's competition here
Rasi Electrodes Limited (BSE: RASIELEC.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs RASIELEC.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RASIELEC.BO has a market cap of 449.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while RASIELEC.BO trades at ₹14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas RASIELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 60.13. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RASIELEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to RASIELEC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check RASIELEC.BO's competition here
Ramgopal Polytex Limited (BSE: RAMGOPOLY.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs RAMGOPOLY.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RAMGOPOLY.BO has a market cap of 419.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while RAMGOPOLY.BO trades at ₹28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas RAMGOPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -317.91. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check RAMGOPOLY.BO's competition here
CCME Global Ltd (BSE: GENESIS.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs GENESIS.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GENESIS.BO has a market cap of 390M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while GENESIS.BO trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas GENESIS.BO's P/E ratio is -166.67. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GENESIS.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to GENESIS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check GENESIS.BO's competition here
National Plastic Industries Limited (BSE: NATPLAS.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs NATPLAS.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NATPLAS.BO has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while NATPLAS.BO trades at ₹39.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas NATPLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NATPLAS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to NATPLAS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check NATPLAS.BO's competition here
Alfa Ica (India) Limited (BSE: ALFAICA.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ALFAICA.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ALFAICA.BO has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ALFAICA.BO trades at ₹80.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ALFAICA.BO's P/E ratio is 81.97. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALFAICA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to ALFAICA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ALFAICA.BO's competition here
Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited (NSE: GUJRAFFIA.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs GUJRAFFIA.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GUJRAFFIA.NS has a market cap of 225.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while GUJRAFFIA.NS trades at ₹41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas GUJRAFFIA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check GUJRAFFIA.NS's competition here
Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited (BSE: GUJRAFFIA.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs GUJRAFFIA.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GUJRAFFIA.BO has a market cap of 216.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while GUJRAFFIA.BO trades at ₹40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas GUJRAFFIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GUJRAFFIA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to GUJRAFFIA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check GUJRAFFIA.BO's competition here
Tijaria Polypipes Limited (BSE: TIJARIA.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs TIJARIA.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TIJARIA.BO has a market cap of 213.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while TIJARIA.BO trades at ₹7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas TIJARIA.BO's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TIJARIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to TIJARIA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check TIJARIA.BO's competition here
Tijaria Polypipes Limited (NSE: TIJARIA.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs TIJARIA.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TIJARIA.NS has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while TIJARIA.NS trades at ₹7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas TIJARIA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TIJARIA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to TIJARIA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check TIJARIA.NS's competition here
Command Polymers Limited (BSE: COMMAND.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs COMMAND.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, COMMAND.BO has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while COMMAND.BO trades at ₹21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas COMMAND.BO's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COMMAND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to COMMAND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check COMMAND.BO's competition here
Maharashtra Corporation Limited (BSE: MAHACORP.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs MAHACORP.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MAHACORP.BO has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while MAHACORP.BO trades at ₹0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas MAHACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MAHACORP.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to MAHACORP.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check MAHACORP.BO's competition here
Niraj Ispat Industries Ltd. (NSE: NIRAJISPAT.NS)
FLUIDOM.BO vs NIRAJISPAT.NS Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NIRAJISPAT.NS has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while NIRAJISPAT.NS trades at ₹300.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas NIRAJISPAT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check NIRAJISPAT.NS's competition here
Vamshi Rubber Limited (BSE: VAMSHIRU.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs VAMSHIRU.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VAMSHIRU.BO has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while VAMSHIRU.BO trades at ₹39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas VAMSHIRU.BO's P/E ratio is 109.24. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VAMSHIRU.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to VAMSHIRU.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check VAMSHIRU.BO's competition here
Kunststoffe Industries Limited (BSE: KUNSTOFF.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs KUNSTOFF.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KUNSTOFF.BO has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while KUNSTOFF.BO trades at ₹20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas KUNSTOFF.BO's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KUNSTOFF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to KUNSTOFF.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check KUNSTOFF.BO's competition here
Polycon International Ltd. (BSE: POLYCON.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs POLYCON.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, POLYCON.BO has a market cap of 121.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while POLYCON.BO trades at ₹24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas POLYCON.BO's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to POLYCON.BO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCON.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check POLYCON.BO's competition here
Shree Ganesh Elastoplast Limited (BSE: SHGANEL.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs SHGANEL.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SHGANEL.BO has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while SHGANEL.BO trades at ₹18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas SHGANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHGANEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to SHGANEL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check SHGANEL.BO's competition here
Ashish Polyplast Limited (BSE: ASHISHPO.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ASHISHPO.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASHISHPO.BO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ASHISHPO.BO trades at ₹27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ASHISHPO.BO's P/E ratio is 115.96. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASHISHPO.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to ASHISHPO.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ASHISHPO.BO's competition here
Milestone Global Limited (BSE: MILESTONE.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs MILESTONE.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MILESTONE.BO has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while MILESTONE.BO trades at ₹18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas MILESTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MILESTONE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to MILESTONE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check MILESTONE.BO's competition here
Narmada Macplast Drip Irrigation Systems Ltd. (BSE: NARMP.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs NARMP.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NARMP.BO has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while NARMP.BO trades at ₹23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas NARMP.BO's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NARMP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is less volatile compared to NARMP.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check NARMP.BO's competition here
Arcee Industries Limited (BSE: ARCEEIN.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs ARCEEIN.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ARCEEIN.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while ARCEEIN.BO trades at ₹11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas ARCEEIN.BO's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARCEEIN.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to ARCEEIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check ARCEEIN.BO's competition here
Innocorp Limited (BSE: INNOCORP.BO)
FLUIDOM.BO vs INNOCORP.BO Comparison September 2026
Fluidomat Limited (BSE: FLUIDOM.BO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the BSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUIDOM.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, INNOCORP.BO has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUIDOM.BO is priced at ₹760.90 on the BSE, while INNOCORP.BO trades at ₹4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUIDOM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.84, whereas INNOCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -153.54. In terms of profitability, FLUIDOM.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INNOCORP.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUIDOM.BO is more volatile compared to INNOCORP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUIDOM.BO.Check INNOCORP.BO's competition here